Home | Community | Message Board

Kratom Eye
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  [ show all ]
A tangent continued...
    #4756491 -

In deference to Annapurna1 I have created this thread to continue a discussion that threatened to eventually derail her thread's attempt to show how Columbine High School produces either more fascist Bush-like neo-cons or more "Little Eichmanns" (or maybe both). I got off on a tangent in response to a comment of Ancalagon and for that I apologize. See http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/4754616#Post4754616 for more details.

Here's some commentary by Mark Steyn http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16801982^7583,00.html that amplifies the points I was making in that thread, and does so much more eloquently:



***************************************************************

Mark Steyn: Islamist way or no way

October 04, 2005

It's not just the environmentalists who think globally and act locally. The jihadi who murdered Newcastle woman Jennifer Williamson, Perth teenager Brendan Fitzgerald and a couple of dozen more Australians, Indonesians, Japanese and others had certain things in common with the July 7 London Tube killers. For example, Azahari bin Husin, who police believe may be the bomb-maker behind this weekend's atrocity, completed a doctorate at England's Reading University. The contribution of the British education system to the jihad is really quite remarkable.

But, on the other hand, despite Clive Williams's game attempt to connect the two on this page yesterday, nobody seriously thinks what happened in Bali has anything to do with Iraq. There are, in the end, no root causes, or anyway not ones that can be negotiated by troop withdrawals or a Palestinian state. There is only a metastasising cancer that preys on whatever local conditions are to hand. Five days before the slaughter in Bali, nine Islamists were arrested in Paris for reportedly plotting to attack the Metro. Must be all those French troops in Iraq, right? So much for the sterling efforts of President Jacques Chirac and his Prime Minister, Dominique de Villepin, as the two chief obstructionists of Bush-Blair-Howard neo-con-Zionist warmongering these past three years.

When the suicide bombers self-detonated on Saturday, the travel section of Britain's The Sunday Telegraph had already gone to press, its lead story a feature on how Bali's economy had bounced back from the carnage of 2002. We all want to believe that: one terrorist attack is like a tsunami or hurricane, just one of those things, blows in out of the blue, then the familiar contours of the landscape return. But two attacks are a permanent feature, the way things are and will be for some years, as one by one the bars and hotels and clubs and restaurants shut up shop. Many of the Australians injured this weekend had waited to return to Bali, just to make sure it was "safe". But it isn't, and it won't be for a long time, and by the time it is it won't be the Bali that Westerners flocked to before 2002.

I found myself behind a car in Vermont, in the US, the other day; it had a one-word bumper sticker with the injunction "COEXIST". It's one of those sentiments beloved of Western progressives, one designed principally to flatter their sense of moral superiority. The C was the Islamic crescent, the O was the hippie peace sign, the X was the Star of David and the T was the Christian cross. Very nice, hard to argue with. But the reality is, it's the first of those symbols that has a problem with coexistence. Take the crescent out of the equation and you wouldn't need a bumper sticker at all. Indeed, coexistence is what the Islamists are at war with; or, if you prefer, pluralism, the idea that different groups can rub along together within the same general neighbourhood. There are many trouble spots across the world but, as a general rule, even if one gives no more than a cursory glance at the foreign pages, it's easy to guess at least one of the sides: Muslims v Jews in Palestine, Muslims v Hindus in Kashmir, Muslims v Christians in Nigeria, Muslims v Buddhists in southern Thailand, Muslims v (your team here). Whatever one's views of the merits on a case by case basis, the ubiquitousness of one team is a fact.

"Men of intemperate mind never can be free; their passions forge their fetters," wrote Edmund Burke. And, in that sense, Bali is more symbolic of the Islamofascist strategy than London or Madrid, Beslan or Istanbul. The jihad has held out against some tough enemies: the Israelis in the West Bank, the Russians in Chechnya; these are primal conflicts. But what's the beef in Bali? Oh, to be sure, to the more fastidious Islamist some of those decadent hedonist fornicating Westerners whooping it up are a little offensive. But they'd be offensive whoever they were and whatever they did. It's the reality of a pluralist enclave within the world's largest Muslim nation that offends. It's the coexistence, stupid.

So even Muslims v (your team here) doesn't quite cover it. You don't have to have a team or even be aware that you belong to any side. You can be a hippie-dippy hey-man-I-love-everybody-whatever-your-bag-is-cool backpacking Dutch stoner, and they'll blow you up with as much enthusiasm as if you were Dick Cheney. As a spokesman for the Islamic Army of Aden put it in 2002, explaining why they bombed a French oil tanker: "We would have preferred to hit a US frigate, but no problem because they are all infidels."

No problem. In our time, even the most fascistic ideologies have been savvy enough to cover their darker impulses in sappy labels. The Soviet bloc was comprised of wall-to-wall "people's republics", which is the precise opposite of what they were: a stylistic audacity Orwell caught perfectly in 1984, with its Ministry of Truth (that is, official lies). But the Islamists don't even bother going through the traditional rhetorical feints. They say what they mean and they mean what they say. "We are here as on a darkling plain ..." wrote Matthew Arnold in the famous concluding lines to Dover Beach, "where ignorant armies clash by night".

But we choose in large part to stay in ignorance. Blow up the London Underground during a G8 summit and the world's leaders twitter about how tragic and ironic it is that this should have happened just as they're taking steps to deal with the issues, as though the terrorists are upset about poverty in Africa and global warming.

So, even in a great blinding flash of clarity, we can't wait to switch the lights off and go back to fumbling around on the darkling plain. Bali three years ago and Bali three days ago light up the sky: they make unavoidable the truth that Islamism is a classic "armed doctrine"; it exists to destroy. The reality of Bali's contribution to Indonesia's economic health is irrelevant. The jihadists would rather that the country be poorer and purer than prosperous and pluralist. For one thing, it's richer soil for them. If the Islamofascists gain formal control of Indonesia, it won't be a parochial, self-absorbed dictatorship such as Suharto's but a launching pad for an Islamic superstate across Southeast Asia and the Pacific.

Can they pull it off? The reality is that there are more Muslim states than a half-century ago, many more Muslims within non-Muslim states, and many more of those Muslims are radicalised and fundamentalist. It's not hard to understand. All you have to do is take them at their word. As Bassam Tibi, a Muslim professor at Gottingen University in Germany, said in an interesting speech a few months after September 11, "Both sides should acknowledge candidly that although they might use identical terms, these mean different things to each of them. The word peace, for example, implies to a Muslim the extension of the Dar al-Islam -- or House of Islam -- to the entire world. This is completely different from the Enlightenment concept of eternal peace that dominates Western thought. Only when the entire world is a Dar al-Islam will it be a Dar a-Salam, or House of Peace."

That's why they blew up Bali in 2002, and last weekend, and why they'll keep blowing it up. It's not about Bush or Blair or Iraq or Palestine. It's about a world where everything other than Islamism lies in ruins.


************************************************************





Phred


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Phred]
    #4756746 -

One of the better written blogs I've ever seen.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Phred]
    #4758671 -

But, on the other hand, despite Clive Williams's game attempt to connect the two on this page yesterday, nobody seriously thinks what happened in Bali has anything to do with Iraq

Does this moron have any evidence to support his proposition?

Lets look at evidence instead of fantasy. The guy who carried out the suicide attacks in London stated directly that this was in response to the invasion of Iraq. That's pretty irrefutable. If this is the work of the same group who planned the London attacks then clearly Iraq has a lot to do with it.

Before the bomber clearly stated in a video that the London attacks were down to Iraq Tony Blair was insisting those had nothing to do with Iraq too.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Alex213]
    #4759335 -

What connection do you see between the bombings in Bali and the deposing of Hussein's Ba'athist regime in Iraq?




Phred


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Phred]
    #4759340 -

That article does raise some interesting points. Although I wouldn't say all Muslims are like this, I think the crazed fundamentalists responsible for all these bombings probably won't stop until the whole world follows their dictates. Can anyone say "Islamofascists"?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Phred]
    #4759575 -

Sweet.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #4759641 -




A chilling message for the infidels

Just six weeks before last Saturday's terrorist atrocity in Bali, in a jail cell in Jakarta, I interviewed Abu Bakar Bashir, the alleged spiritual leader of Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), al-Qa'eda's main ally in the region, and the group on which western attention is focused in the hunt for culprits.

Bashir was celebrating the news that an Indonesian court had agreed to reduce his 30-month sentence for conspiracy in the 2002 Bali bombings by more than four months, meaning that he will soon walk free.

Ever since the first bombings, in which 202 people died, Indonesian authorities have been woolly in their response to terrorism for fear of alienating a largely anti-American population. Nothing illustrates this better than the appeal court's judgment on Bashir's early release - they took the decision even though he was implicated in a JI plot to

overthrow Indonesia's previous government, and despite independent testimony from senior JI operatives in custody that he had approved the 2002 bombings.

At 66, Bashir is a lanky, bespectacled Hadrami, who, like Osama Bin Laden, traces his family back to the Hadramawt region of Yemen. Surrounded by acolytes - including known JI bombers - serving him dates, he answered questions with a strong voice and easy laugh.

Scott Atran: What are the conditions for Islam to be strong?


Abu Bakar Bashir: The infidel country must be visited and spied upon. If we don't come to them, they will persecute Islam. They will prevent non-Muslims converting.

SA: What can the West, especially the US, do to make the world more peaceful?
ABB: They have to stop fighting Islam. That's impossible because


it is sunnatullah [destiny, a law of nature], as Allah has said in the Koran. If they want to have peace, they have to accept to be governed by Islam.
SA: What if they persist?
ABB: We'll keep fighting them and they'll lose. The batil [falsehood] will lose sooner or later. I sent a letter to Bush. I said that you'll lose and there is no point for you [to fight us]. This [concept] is found in the Koran.
SA: Have you met Osama Bin Laden?
ABB: No, no. I want to though. After my release, I hope I can meet him.
SA: Where will you find him?
ABB: If he still exists - but how could I? I have sympathy for his struggle. Osama is Allah's soldier. When I heard his story, I came to the conclusion that he's mujahid, a soldier of Allah.
SA: You will always be on his side?
ABB: His tactics and calculations may sometimes be wrong, he's an

ordinary human being after all. I don't agree with all of his actions. Osama believes in total war. This concept I don't agree with. If this occurs in an Islamic country, the fitnah [discord] will be felt by Muslims. But to attack them in their country [America] is fine.
SA: So this fight will never end?
ABB: Never. This fight is compulsory. Muslims who don't hate America sin. What I mean by America is George Bush's regime. There is no iman [belief] if one doesn't hate America.
SA: How can the American regime and its policies change?
ABB: We'll see. As long as there is no intention to fight us and Islam continues to grow there can be peace. This is the doctrine of Islam. Islam can't be ruled by others. Allah's law must stand above human law. There is no [example] of Islam and infidels, the right and the wrong, living together in peace.


http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?menuID=2&subID=46

Edited by Los_Pepes (10/05/05 05:25 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Los_Pepes]
    #4759679 -

Hate preaching cleric jailed



A Muslim cleric who urged followers to kill non-believers, Americans, Hindus and Jews has been jailed for nine years.
Jamaican-born Sheik Abdullah el-Faisal, 39, was told he had "fanned the flames of hostility", as Old Bailey judge Peter Beaumont delivered the sentence.

The judge recommended that el-Faisal, from Stratford in east London, should serve at least half of the sentence and then be deported.

El-Faisal - who said it is permissible to use chemical weapons to kill unbelievers - stretched out an arm to a group of around 12 shocked-looking supporters as he was led away.

Outside court, defence lawyer Jerome Lynch QC said there were plans to appeal, adding: "There is a realistic prospect that many Muslims will regard this sentence as harsh, even though they don't share his views."

El-Faisal received seven years for soliciting murder, 12 months to run concurrently for using threatening and insulting words and a further two years - to run consecutively - for using threatening and insulting recordings.

The Muslim cleric - the first to face trial in the UK - was charged after a tape of a lecture he gave was found in a car and others uncovered by police investigating al-Qaeda links in the UK.

'Preached hate'

During the trial el-Faisal argued that his words were taken from the Koran, the Muslim holy book, and that he had been misrepresented.

But the judge said that while Britain prided itself on its freedom of speech, it could not accept it when other people's rights were breached.

He told el-Faisal: "As the jury found, you not only preached hate, but the words you uttered in those meetings were recorded to reach a wider audience.

"You urged those who listened and watched to kill those who did not share your faith."

'Use missiles'

One tape of el-Faisal, titled Jihad, contained the words: "So you go to India and if you see a Hindu walking down the road you are allowed to kill him and take his money, is that clear?"

In a tape called Rules of Jihad, which is thought to have been made before the 11 September 2001 attacks, el-Faisal told his audience: "You have to learn how to shoot.

"You have to learn how to fly planes, drive tanks and you have to learn how to load your guns and to use missiles."

He said: "You are only allowed to use nuclear weapons in that country which is 100% unbelievers."

The jury heard that el-Faisal tried to recruit British schoolboys for terrorist training camps and promised them "seventy-two virgins in paradise", if they died fighting a holy war.

On a tape called Them Versus Us he said: "There are two religions in the world today - the right one and the wrong one. Islam versus the rest of the world."

'Not malicious'

Defence lawyer Jerome Lynch QC, said it was unfair that people such as controversial cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri had been seen by police and not brought to court like el-Faisal.

Abu Hamza - who was dropped as a defence witness after a police raid on Finsbury Park mosque - told the judge in a pre-trial hearing that he had been seen seven times by Special Branch.

Mr Lynch said of el-Faisal: "This was a man who, although misguided, was not malicious."

He said el-Faisal had helped young people, including drug addicts, in inner cities.

But David Perry, prosecuting, said the el-Faisal was a "fanatic and extremist" who had tried to save himself by claiming the Koran was on trial.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke from Scotland Yard's Anti Terrorist Branch said: "El-Faisal's speeches were designed to do more than stir up racial hatred. He was actively urging young people to commit murder.

"These are extremely serious offences, made even more appalling by his attempt to justify them through the Islamic faith."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2829059.stm

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Phred]
    #4759844 -

Phred said:
What connection do you see between the bombings in Bali and the deposing of Hussein's Ba'athist regime in Iraq?




Phred



Is this supposed to be some kind of smoking gun? I have absolutely no idea what motivated the Bali bombers, I have not even close to enough knowledge to even venture a guess. What I'm wondering is, what does that have to do with the terrorists that attacked America? Many, a GREAT many, of those terrorists (you know, the ones that America's foreign policy should be considering) have in fact listed our various escapades in the region along with our support of various regimes in the region has a huge part of why they do what they do. I do not think it is the only reason they do what they do -- it is undoubtedly a mix of an easily distorted ideaology that can gain easy ground because of the desperation many in the region have and the grievances (many of them very valid) they can be justified in having with certain western powers. You challenged me a while ago to give you one example of America interfering in the Arab world; I gave you the case of the CIA directed coup of the democratically elected government of Iran and subsequent elevation of the brutal Shah to power. I don't believe you ever followed that up -- do you really think America's horrendous foreign policy over the last half century or so has not fueled the fire immensely? Is it not conceivable that someone who may sit in the sand and muse about how much he hates the decadence of the west would not dare consider actually doing something about it until, say, his son's leg was blown off by an American grenade? Or his house was destroyed by an American Apache? Anything?


--------------------
?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.?
-Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Phred]
    #4761849 -

Quote:
What connection do you see between the bombings in Bali and the deposing of Hussein's Ba'athist regime in Iraq?




The connection I see is the suicide bombers telling us they are planting the bombs in retaliation for Iraq.

Suicide bomber's video confession blames Iraq war
By Daniel McGrory and Michael Theodoulou

IN A filmed confession shown on an Arabic satellite network last night, Mohammed Siddique Khan, the leader of the July 7 London bombers, explained why he was prepared to die in a suicide attack.
Speaking in English in a pronounced Yorkshire accent, the 30-year-old former teaching assistant from Leeds blamed Britain?s role in the invasion of Iraq for young, British-born Muslims being ready to attack the country of their birth. Khan said: ?Until we feel secure you will be our targets. Until you stop the bombing, gassing, imprisonment and torture . . . we will not stop this fight.?

He claimed the timing for the attacks was the anniversary of Britain and other European countries ignoring a truce offer from bin Laden to withdraw troops from Iraq and Afghanistan or face a terror campaign.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1761688,00.html

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Alex213]
    #4761908 -

Alex213 said:
He claimed the timing for the attacks was the anniversary of Britain and other European countries ignoring a truce offer from bin Laden to withdraw troops from Iraq and Afghanistan or face a terror campaign.




Should we negotiate and treat terrorism as a legitimate method of obtaining political power?

I'm sure that will go over real big.

Appeasement? Just blow up a daycare, cut off some heads, and the will of the world is at your finger-tips.


--------------------
I am in love with Acidic_Sloth


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Alex213]
    #4761983 -

No, I'm sorry, but you just can't negotiate with these terrorists, for reasons Looner pointed out. It just sets a dangerous precedent giving any idiot with an axe to grind and a vest full of explosives a green light to do as he/she pleases... :thumbdown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Le_Canard]
    #4762000 -

I like RandalFlagg's idea of withdrawing our troops from abroad and taking a more isolationist foreign policy, but at the same time ruthlessly pursuing and prosecuting those who do commit acts of terrorism.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Silversoul]
    #4762774 -

Paradigm said:
I like RandalFlagg's idea of withdrawing our troops from abroad and taking a more isolationist foreign policy, but at the same time ruthlessly pursuing and prosecuting those who do commit acts of terrorism.



Do you think that besides the problems involved with Iraq currently, that it serves as a front to hunt and kill terrorists as they come to us?


--------------------
I am in love with Acidic_Sloth


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: looner2]
    #4762992 -


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: looner2]
    #4762998 -

looner2 said:
Paradigm said:
I like RandalFlagg's idea of withdrawing our troops from abroad and taking a more isolationist foreign policy, but at the same time ruthlessly pursuing and prosecuting those who do commit acts of terrorism.



Do you think that besides the problems involved with Iraq currently, that it serves as a front to hunt and kill terrorists as they come to us?



This seems to assume that there are a fixed number of terrorists, X, that would be fully engaged in plots against the American homeland but, because of the wisdom of our Great Leader, are instead squandering themselves upon the Grand American Army in Iraq. That, of course, is total horseshit. You have absolutely no way to know that our actions in Iraq haven't created FAR more terrorists than have been killed so far -- Donald Rumsfeld admitted as much in his speech on the impossibility of getting metrics for this war.


--------------------
?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.?
-Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Los_Pepes]
    #4762999 -

Los_Pepes said:




Can we ban this idiot already?


--------------------
?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.?
-Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Le_Canard]
    #4763016 -

ToiletDuk said:
No, I'm sorry, but you just can't negotiate with these terrorists, for reasons Looner pointed out. It just sets a dangerous precedent giving any idiot with an axe to grind and a vest full of explosives a green light to do as he/she pleases... :thumbdown:



Hypothetical incoming, bear with me: Assume our government becomes extremely tyrannical at some point in the future. Let's say various groups pursue violent means (since there is truly no other option for them) of fighting the tyranny. Some groups make sure to only attack the greatest outposts of governmental tyranny. Other groups target any government building. Still other groups attack anyone and anything that will get their message out. Now obviously the first two groups are far more legitimate than the third -- the third, in fact, is a disgrace and should not be lionized at all. Now let's say citizens in this country are considering these groups and their message -- many of them can't help but agree with every single one of these groups's philosophies: the government is most certainly tyrannical and it needs to be stopped. A certain sect, however, says that regardless of the plausibility of the argument these groups present, the citizens should not support such proposals because to do so would be to give the actions of that third group credence and that would simply be unconscionable. What say you?


--------------------
?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.?
-Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Ancalagon]
    #4763037 -

Ancalagon said:
Hypothetical incoming, bear with me: Assume our government becomes extremely tyrannical at some point in the future.



That's hypothetical?  :smirk:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A tangent continued... [Re: Ancalagon]
    #4763056 -

Ancalagon said:
Los_Pepes said:




Can we ban this idiot already?



Can we ban Angalacon already?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  [ show all ]

Shop: Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* the making of a terrorist rhizo 465 5 03/22/03 08:12 PM
by mntlfngrs
* Rumsfeld to provoke terrorist attacks
( 1 2 all )
carbonhoots 3,996 32 11/06/02 06:01 AM
by luvdemshrooms
* Bush Administration's continued attack on MMJ patients
( 1 2 3 all )
Swami 5,509 48 04/27/04 10:08 PM
by Baby_Hitler
* USA HAS GONE CRAZY - TERRORIST ATACKS!!!!!
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
MAIA 16,181 143 09/12/11 01:34 PM
by wood_stones
* Porous Mexican Border as a Terrorist Entry Point
( 1 2 all )
Autonomous 4,302 36 01/05/04 01:19 PM
by Xlea321
* Redstorm's tangent Phred 1,379 14 11/18/05 09:12 AM
by SirTripAlot
* How to handle terrorists
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Phred 6,294 63 02/20/04 08:21 PM
by TheOneYouKnow
* Terrorists look for a path TO peace - but the path IS peace
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
spacedragon 11,936 148 06/21/04 08:26 AM
by st0nedphucker

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
3,765 topic views. 1 members, 27 guests and 13 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.025 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 16 queries.