Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 668 | 669 | 670 | 671 | 672 | 673 | 674 | 675 | 676 | 677 | 678 | 679 | 680 | 681 | 682 | 683 | 684 | 685 | 686 | 687 | 688 | | Last >
Re: PLUMP 2020 [Re: qman] * 1
    #27087815 -

The machines print a paper trail. The paper trail can be verified by each voter if they like. The digital count has to match the paper count. The main advantage of the digital count is that you can get votes counted and reported much faster, meanwhile the paper record is much more secure.

It’s pretty straightforward when you think about it.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PLUMP 2020 [Re: christopera]
    #27087829 -

christopera said:
The machines print a paper trail. The paper trail can be verified by each voter if they like. The digital count has to match the paper count. The main advantage of the digital count is that you can get votes counted and reported much faster, meanwhile the paper record is much more secure.

It’s pretty straightforward when you think about it.


OK, since I'm assuming the paper count matched the digital count, there's no point of examining the software of the machines. Would that be a correct assessment?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PLUMP 2020 [Re: qman]
    #27087837 -

Pretty much.

https://www.dominionvoting.com/dominion-statement-on-sidney-powell-charges/


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PLUMP 2020 [Re: qman]
    #27087839 -

qman said:
Sulfurshelfsean said:
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/17/georgia-says-voting-machine-audit-found-no-evidence-of-fraud-tampering.html
Yes there have been audits and inspections of voting machines.


OK, this is what I'm looking for, are there any other states that did that same inspection?  I say keep on doing it.


I'm not sure thats just the first story about it that popped up. Might be that since they pushed so hard in georgia thwy might be the only ones who did that kind of investigating? Would it fall on trumps team to pay for investigators to dig up the evidence?


--------------------


Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PLUMP 2020 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
    #27087847 -

Georgia did a hand recount anyway, and it was consistent with the machines so we know the machines didn't have any rigging in Georgia.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PLUMP 2020 [Re: qman] * 1
    #27087848 -

qman said:
christopera said:
The machines print a paper trail. The paper trail can be verified by each voter if they like. The digital count has to match the paper count. The main advantage of the digital count is that you can get votes counted and reported much faster, meanwhile the paper record is much more secure.

It’s pretty straightforward when you think about it.


OK, since I'm assuming the paper count matched the digital count, there's no point of examining the software of the machines. Would that be a correct assessment?


There are lots of good reasons for examining voting software anyway, and it's actually pretty fucked up (in my opinion) that the US relies on private companies to provide voting software using proprietary software (including software that has a Trump trademark), instead of a publicly maintained open source software where anybody can go look at the source code and expose any possible flaws or exploits.

None of that is related to fraud, however. The software should be inspected, but from the perspective of open and verifiable elections in the future, not from the perspective of possible fraud when the paper counts match.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PLUMP 2020 [Re: Kryptos]
    #27087868 -

I assume when this is over Sidney Powell will be facing a big fat libel lawsuit


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: koods]
    #27087869 -

Maybe, but most of what she said would be protected by litigation privilege.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: PLUMP 2020 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean] * 1
    #27087872 -

Sulfurshelfsean said:
qman said:
Sulfurshelfsean said:
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/17/georgia-says-voting-machine-audit-found-no-evidence-of-fraud-tampering.html
Yes there have been audits and inspections of voting machines.


OK, this is what I'm looking for, are there any other states that did that same inspection?  I say keep on doing it.


I'm not sure thats just the first story about it that popped up. Might be that since they pushed so hard in georgia thwy might be the only ones who did that kind of investigating? Would it fall on trumps team to pay for investigators to dig up the evidence?


I think they're claiming they're not given access to investigate the machines. I don't know if there's truth to that claim or not.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: qman]
    #27087875 -

They would have if they could have shown any likelihood of success with their case, but they couldn't.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: Enlil] * 1
    #27087919 -

Enlil said:
They would have if they could have shown any likelihood of success with their case, but they couldn't.


Well, I think Georgia did the right thing and proved the Trump team wrong. I suggest other states should do the same so there's no more bitching about it. I'm not naive enough to suggest that Trump and his supporters most likely disagree with the Georgia methodology and results, but it's still a good policy under the circumstances.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: qman]
    #27087931 -

They won't stop bitching about it. Why spend millions at this point?


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: qman]
    #27087946 -

qman said:
Enlil said:
They would have if they could have shown any likelihood of success with their case, but they couldn't.


Well, I think Georgia did the right thing and proved the Trump team wrong. I suggest other states should do the same so there's no more bitching about it. I'm not naive enough to suggest that Trump and his supporters most likely disagree with the Georgia methodology and results, but it's still a good policy under the circumstances.


Probably not a bad idea. And they should charge trump for it if the results show no tampering....honestly he should have to pay for either way. He has billions right? Shouldn't be more than a speed bump for ole moneybags.


--------------------


Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
    #27087952 -

Republicans are refusing to pay for the Wisconsin recount they demanded


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean] * 1
    #27088068 -

Sulfurshelfsean said:
qman said:
Enlil said:
They would have if they could have shown any likelihood of success with their case, but they couldn't.


Well, I think Georgia did the right thing and proved the Trump team wrong. I suggest other states should do the same so there's no more bitching about it. I'm not naive enough to suggest that Trump and his supporters most likely disagree with the Georgia methodology and results, but it's still a good policy under the circumstances.


Probably not a bad idea. And they should charge trump for it if the results show no tampering....honestly he should have to pay for either way. He has billions right? Shouldn't be more than a speed bump for ole moneybags.


That's not how conspiracies work. If you present evidence disproving a conspiracy theory to a conspiracy theorist, they are more likely to believe in the truth of the conspiracy. After all, why else would you be trying so hard to prove it false?

I think the correct course of action is just to openly laugh at and mock anyone still questioning results.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: Kryptos]
    #27088278 -

Its true they try and turn it around and when they hit a brick wall it devolves into "well duh someone was paid off".


--------------------


Everything is better when it is done ON TOP OF A MOUNTAIN!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: Sulfurshelfsean]
    #27088289 -

Sidney Powell is assembling, in her words, "a massive RICO case".
There are a couple problems though. She hasn't been a prosecutor since 1988.
The other thing is all the evidence she's filed so far has been ruled to be garbage, so attaching it to a flow chart isn't going to impress anyone except the conspiracy theory crowd. I think she knows that, and this isn't really a legal angle. It's her business plan for the post-Trump years, which starts somewhere between minutes and days from now.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: Brian Jones]
    #27088313 -

I wondering whether Trump will walk out the door on January 20th, or will the Secret Service and military have to remove him? I think he would like the latter to fire up his base. A real deep state conspiracy.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: Brian Jones]
    #27088344 -

RICO allows a private citizen to file a civil action as well.


--------------------
Censoring opposing views since 2014.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Trump 2024 [Re: Enlil]
    #27088374 -

So does that mean she is collecting money from citizens to bankroll the case?


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 668 | 669 | 670 | 671 | 672 | 673 | 674 | 675 | 676 | 677 | 678 | 679 | 680 | 681 | 682 | 683 | 684 | 685 | 686 | 687 | 688 | | Last >

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* The Trump Phenomenon
( 1 2 3 4 ... 50 51 )		 Count of Sabugosa 41,973 1,006 01/27/16 02:53 PM
by zappaisgod
* Energized By Trump's Win, White Nationalists Gather To 'Change The World' yogabunnyM 848 13 11/22/16 04:53 PM
by Mostly_Harmless
* Trump
( 1 2 3 4 ... 131 132 )		 DividedQuantumM 80,057 2,635 01/19/21 07:19 AM
by STPLSD25
* Trump calls CNN fake news
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )		 Psychonott 1,907 103 01/17/17 01:29 PM
by Falcon91Wolvrn03
* Trump tells BLM's Protester to get the hell out
( 1 2 3 4 ... 17 18 )		 qman 13,358 355 12/03/15 04:36 PM
by airclay
* China could build a modern military by 2020
( 1 2 all )		 Green_T 3,249 23 08/28/11 08:48 PM
by Madtowntripper
* 2020 VISION What will Canada look like in 15 years?
( 1 2 3 4 all )		 lonestar2004 10,885 65 12/12/19 01:38 PM
by JohnRainy
* interesting email for trump and hillary supporters alike... tarlin 281 12 02/27/26 07:20 PM
by Enlil

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
498,769 topic views. 1 members, 52 guests and 26 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.039 seconds spending 0.017 seconds on 16 queries.