bodhisatta said:

https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/25668134

---

haha good times

ShaperDreaming said:

TheAtlantean runs 70 tubs at once. Has a tek. Looks hellish to maintain. Good luck.

Biggest I ever went was 16 shoeboxes... I quickly decided against doing that again.

---

Sweet , but I only saw or heard mention of modded tubs in that post/tek though. Did I miss it? Or was it in another post?

Also, didn't see anything after looking again about 70 tubs in either that post or his other main threads/journals. Was it another member you were thinking of? Or maybe it's late and I'm just blind?

This guy's tek is a good example for me to ask this other question I have been wondering about since I started wading through the enormous amount of reading to be done on this site... : Do we still call it a "tek" when it is just another person's version/write up of existing teks? It was just as heavy on his wandering ramblings as it was on actual information, and of that information, nothing new was offered. So does it still qualify as a tek just because the person who did the typing put that label on it? I am interested to hear what people say.



In regards to the original post; if anybody has done big unmodded grows, and would rather PM me so we can chop it up because you don't feel comfortable laying your shit out on the threads like I do that is Gucci too.



I'd love to hear from ya.

Funky Monkey said:

didn't see anything after looking again about 70 tubs

---

https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/25794778#25794778
Here ya go.

And tek=short for technique. Hard to share your technique and it not also be a tek

bodhisatta said:

I think sharper is trying to point out that its few and far between to find people doing massive grows especially perpetually

---

Also this. TheAtlantean is one of the very very few people who almost always has walls of bins going and also posts here. Most people keep that shit on the dl a little more. Hell, I currently don't even indicate the scale of what I'm growing appropriately any more, and I'm no where near 70 tubs. I've given far far too many clues about who I am, where I live, and what I grow. I don't think anyone out there is looking for me, and I don't want to give anyone any extra reasons either

And damnit bod! I only have one R in my name

bodhisatta said:

Any guide people write down is a tek.

---

Roger that, thanks. I will not be shy about calling something a tek if I write something up then. Sweet. I have just seen people cry foul saying that "...it is just a rehashing of so-and-so's tek...", but now I know that is likely because the person didn't give credit or something.

So cool, a tek is a tek. Gucci.

ShaperDreaming said:

- And tek=short for technique. Hard to share your technique and it not also be a tek

- I've given far far too many clues about who I am, where I live, and what I grow. I don't think anyone out there is looking for me, and I don't want to give anyone any extra reasons either

---

- Roger that as well I was up on the shorthand terminology, just not sure of this finer point in regards to the community etiquette for throwing up teks if there are existing ones just like it.

- That's exactly why I have chosen not to ever receive any incoming trades with this account. I'll shoot out free prints and whatnot, but with how I post I would be too paranoid to do much of anything else even though I know they aren't really looking.

bodhisatta said:

Is it bad that ive read it as sharper since ever. I feel bad now.

---

I know, she's had to pull my coat tails more than once. First that she's not a "bro" , and also about the spelling lol

Thanks girl!

Funky Monkey said:

I have just seen people cry foul saying that "...it is just a rehashing of so-and-so's tek..."

---

Haters gonna hate