Home | Community | Message Board


Kratom Eye
Please support our sponsors.

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics >> Mushroom Cultivation

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Amazon Shop: ½ Pint Jars, Brown Rice Flour, Vermiculite

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Offlinefactory81
enthusiast

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 08/22/02
Posts: 314
Loc: Ibiza, Spain
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Double end verm vs single end verm = colonization speeds....
    #1662964 - 06/26/03 03:46 AM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Anyone notice a increase in colonization time by switchin to double end verm? My first batch, I did a few jars double end verm, and these jars I did do, are more then like 50% colonized while the other jars are being super sluggish (a week and theres roughly anywhere from 5 to 15% coloniztion on the rest, now my double end jars, there probably about half or more done like I said....
anyone else have this


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleMOTH
Wild Woman
 User Gallery

Registered: 06/06/03
Posts: 23,381
Loc: In the jungle
Re: Double end verm vs single end verm = colonization speeds.... [Re: factory81]
    #1662998 - 06/26/03 03:46 AM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Interesting. Do you just put 1/2in of verm at the bottom of the jar, fill with substrate and then put 1/2in of verm on the top?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineMAGICSNOOP
mob boss
Registered: 03/31/03
Posts: 394
Loc: bud park
Last seen: 13 years, 11 months
Re: Double end verm vs single end verm = colonization speeds.... [Re: factory81]
    #1662999 - 06/26/03 03:46 AM (14 years, 1 month ago)

i have a question
y r u putting verm. in ur jars? the verm. goes after its out of the jar
u tryin sum new??
that would just seem a waste because verm. sitting on the bottom not mixed in would just take up space.so doing that with lets say a pint jar u put a lil verm. on the bottom then substrate the another layer(witch is suposta be there) on top? sounds like a waste of space


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinefactory81
enthusiast

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 08/22/02
Posts: 314
Loc: Ibiza, Spain
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Re: Double end verm vs single end verm = colonization speeds.... [Re: MAGICSNOOP]
    #1663023 - 06/26/03 03:46 AM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Hmm maybe im so newbie I didnt understand what double end verm technique is. I put verm in jars at the bottom, before i steralized them, half inch verm on top and bottom. The jars with verm on bottom layer have shown rapid growth towards the bottom region of the cake. The cakes also seem to be maybe shrinking a little, so there is even a 1/8th of a inch of free air in the bottom of some jars, maybe this extra air allows for more oxygen in the bottom?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineneutralizer
Spiritual beinghaving a Humanexperience
Registered: 06/17/03
Posts: 635
Loc: This Planet Earth
Last seen: 10 years, 5 months
Re: Double end verm vs single end verm = colonization speeds.... [Re: factory81]
    #1663326 - 06/26/03 03:03 AM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Since verm. is non-nutritive, I'm guessing that any increased rate of growth is because maybe the verm is easier to grow through than the brf/verm combo? That's cool, but you are decreasing the amount of nutrients by putting plain verm instead of brf/verm.. Right?

It might be the extra air in the bottom that's allowing for faster growth, kind of like when flipping a PF jar. That's my guess..


--------------------
There are things known, and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors - Morrison


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineMAGICSNOOP
mob boss
Registered: 03/31/03
Posts: 394
Loc: bud park
Last seen: 13 years, 11 months
Re: Double end verm vs single end verm = colonization speeds.... [Re: neutralizer]
    #1664186 - 06/26/03 12:24 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

could be but like i said ur just wasting verm. and space in the jar thats not needed u dubble end case it after it comes out


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleMagashM
Da Bud Guru
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/25/02
Posts: 5,875
Loc: Near Hilo
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Double end verm vs single end verm = colonization speeds.... [Re: factory81]
    #1664361 - 06/26/03 01:53 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Yes it?s faster. There is more air in the jar and the substrate isn?t resting against the glass on the bottom and can colonize faster. Hmmm...if wasted space means faster colonizing I?d waste the space.



--------------------
All creatures tremble when faced with violence. All creatures fear death, all love life. If we can only see ourselves in others, then how could we possibly hurt another creature?


:growingweed: Join us at the Growery! :growingweed:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineneutralizer
Spiritual beinghaving a Humanexperience
Registered: 06/17/03
Posts: 635
Loc: This Planet Earth
Last seen: 10 years, 5 months
Re: Double end verm vs single end verm = colonization speeds.... [Re: Magash]
    #1664369 - 06/26/03 01:56 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Wasted space = less nutrients, I agree though waiting is sometimes not very pleasant :smile:


--------------------
There are things known, and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors - Morrison


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineTim2133
newbie
Registered: 06/18/03
Posts: 26
Last seen: 12 years, 4 months
Re: Double end verm vs single end verm = colonization speeds.... [Re: neutralizer]
    #1672787 - 06/30/03 02:10 AM (14 years, 28 days ago)

You could just make one extra jar to account for the loss of nutrients and then you'd have the same amount of nutrient material and increased colonization speed.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineSev
Astropath
Registered: 06/06/03
Posts: 1,426
Loc: NY
Last seen: 2 years, 9 months
Re: Double end verm vs single end verm = colonization speeds [Re: Tim2133]
    #1675574 - 07/01/03 01:07 AM (14 years, 27 days ago)

I'd bet it's what another guy said in here, and that it's the additional air for the mycelium.


--------------------
"Do we want the stars? We can have them. Can we borrow cups of fire from the sun? We can and must and light the world." --"On the Shoulders of Giants", Ray Bradbury

All of my posts are full of fiction and blatant lies.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Amazon Shop: ½ Pint Jars, Brown Rice Flour, Vermiculite

Mushrooms, Mycology and Psychedelics >> Mushroom Cultivation

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* lc vs. spore colonization speed? ismokeweed 1,136 6 02/03/08 06:30 PM
by ismokeweed
* SIMPLE way to boost colonization speed..... factory81 1,902 9 06/28/03 02:08 PM
by TxTec
* Personal comparison of colonization speed Swami 847 4 03/19/02 03:40 PM
by homage_etd
* Pint Jars for Double Verm EnCHaNTeDPiXiE 626 4 08/23/03 11:37 PM
by soochi
* Quick vs. slow colonization mystery seattlekid 1,159 8 10/11/02 07:09 PM
by Alkaloids
* Chunky verm vs. Fine verm Visigoth 1,249 3 03/23/02 09:06 PM
by Zen Peddler
* Colonization speed of different species relative to cubensis Baby_Hitler 995 3 06/22/03 07:20 PM
by ph_plus
* Colonization Speeds timmyowner811 853 3 08/06/05 06:11 PM
by legallyhomeless

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Magash, Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, total, FooMan, 13shrooms, stonesun, cronicr, PussyFart, Tmethyl, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta
1,320 topic views. 34 members, 124 guests and 21 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:

Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2017 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 16 queries.