qman said:

Bigbadwooof said:

qman said:

I don't know who hates who more these days, but the fact that both organizations have no public support only reinforces my original point, they're not a threat to the public.

---

That doesn't mean I shouldn't call them cunts, and vehemently express dissent against them. That's how we keep nutjobs in their place.

---

They best way to keep nutjobs in their place is to let their ideas fail in public view, acting like a bigger nut case in trying to reject their already shitty ideas from isolated people is counterproductive.

---

ballsalsa said:

Nazi-Killing Video Game 'Wolfenstein II' Angers Nazis

---

Stonehenge said:

>They best way to keep nutjobs in their place is to let their ideas fail in public view...

---

Quote:

I'll have to disagree with you on that one. Letting Nazi's run about unchecked, without saying shit, is how they take governments.

---

nameless1 said:

ballsalsa said:

Nazi-Killing Video Game 'Wolfenstein II' Angers Nazis

---

All I have to say is a hearty; TOUGHSHIT!

---

Quote:

Tbf most people are pretty stupid, thats why propaganda is necessary even for the 'good guys.'

---

The Ecstatic said:

Tbf most people are pretty stupid, thats why propaganda is necessary even for the 'good guys.'

Thats why the Democrats are such losers. They think real life is like The West Wing where whoever makes the most logical argument wins. I mean, look the shroomery. The dumbest fucks here are the most sure of themselves and never seem to change their minds. Pointing out logical fallacies isnt how you win over voters.

---

Bigbadwooof said:

qman said:

Bigbadwooof said:

qman said:

I don't know who hates who more these days, but the fact that both organizations have no public support only reinforces my original point, they're not a threat to the public.

---

That doesn't mean I shouldn't call them cunts, and vehemently express dissent against them. That's how we keep nutjobs in their place.

---

They best way to keep nutjobs in their place is to let their ideas fail in public view, acting like a bigger nut case in trying to reject their already shitty ideas from isolated people is counterproductive.

---

I'll have to disagree with you on that one. Letting Nazi's run about unchecked, without saying shit, is how they take governments. Look, we already have Donald Trump in office, which is about the most ridiculous thing any sensible person on the fucking planet can even imagine. I'm not holding my breath that the sort of inbred right wing loonies that put him there won't try to impose an authoritarian fascist Nazi regime in the coming years.

Quote:

With that being said, Hitler had lots of legitimate reasons for fellow German citizens to join his movement. If those conditions don't exist today, what's there to be concerned about?

---

No Hitler did not. There was a scared public that was deep in debt, with little hope for a better future. He united them against a common enemy (non-white folks), which made no sense whatsoever, but it was an outlet for their rage. Ignorant naive cunts tend to latch on to race-baiting, rather than deal with their problems in a logical rational way. It's easy to just blame someone, especially if they have a different culture, because you're not likely to make best buddies with them if you're a closed minded authoritarian ideologue anyway. To you, they are 'mongol hordes', or 'unskilled migrants', or 'illegal aliens'. They are not people. They are not human beings.

---

"inbred right wing loonies that put him there"

You see, here's your problem trying to generalize 63 million US citizens.

"He united them against a common enemy, which made no sense whatsoever"

You can't united people without it making some sense, stop lying to yourself. The German population weren't victims of some propaganda, they were willing participants for good reasons in their minds.

"rather than deal with their problems in a logical rational way"

Like murdering people they disagree with? Sound familiar.

Bigbadwooof said:

Like Bodhi's idea about the US going to war (WWII), for the purpose of establishing a Jewish state, claiming that it was in the actual declaration of war.

It wasn't, as evidenced, by oh, I don't know, the actual declaration of war. Somehow, he maintains some ambiguity on the subject, when there objectively is none.

---

you trying to spread lies now? he said he was talking about the Barfour Declaration, right here- he said it "laid the ground work for WW2" so stop being dishonest.

https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/24693034#24693034

wow, you fucking,....wow.
https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/24693027#24693027
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

nameless1 said:

Stonehenge said:

>They best way to keep nutjobs in their place is to let their ideas fail in public view...

---

Wrongo! The general public is so stupid, so incapable of any independent thought at all, so easily manipulated (and always has been), that your theory has proven false again and again.
The public views often enough, and 'believes', especially in a world filled with hateful, jealous antiSemites!
Basic Propaganda/Brainwashing 101!

---

Then you better micromanaged them with anti-propaganda to off set the original propaganda.

"jealous anti-Semites"

We get it, you're Jewish.

akira_akuma said:

^ so you people love negative propaganda that's obvious twisted to suit ends, rather than be truthful.


let the war begin. seriously. you're all meat puppets.

Quote:

Tbf most people are pretty stupid, thats why propaganda is necessary even for the 'good guys.'

---

you're one to talk. the good guys are socialists, but everyone else is a nazi.

LOL

come get some.

---

The Ecstatic said:

Tbf most people are pretty stupid, thats why propaganda is necessary even for the 'good guys.'

Thats why the Democrats are such losers. They think real life is like The West Wing where whoever makes the most logical argument wins. I mean, look the shroomery. The dumbest fucks here are the most sure of themselves and never seem to change their minds. Pointing out logical fallacies isnt how you win over voters.

---

qman said:

Bigbadwooof said:

qman said:

Bigbadwooof said:

That doesn't mean I shouldn't call them cunts, and vehemently express dissent against them. That's how we keep nutjobs in their place.

---

They best way to keep nutjobs in their place is to let their ideas fail in public view, acting like a bigger nut case in trying to reject their already shitty ideas from isolated people is counterproductive.

---

I'll have to disagree with you on that one. Letting Nazi's run about unchecked, without saying shit, is how they take governments. Look, we already have Donald Trump in office, which is about the most ridiculous thing any sensible person on the fucking planet can even imagine. I'm not holding my breath that the sort of inbred right wing loonies that put him there won't try to impose an authoritarian fascist Nazi regime in the coming years.

Quote:

With that being said, Hitler had lots of legitimate reasons for fellow German citizens to join his movement. If those conditions don't exist today, what's there to be concerned about?

---

No Hitler did not. There was a scared public that was deep in debt, with little hope for a better future. He united them against a common enemy (non-white folks), which made no sense whatsoever, but it was an outlet for their rage. Ignorant naive cunts tend to latch on to race-baiting, rather than deal with their problems in a logical rational way. It's easy to just blame someone, especially if they have a different culture, because you're not likely to make best buddies with them if you're a closed minded authoritarian ideologue anyway. To you, they are 'mongol hordes', or 'unskilled migrants', or 'illegal aliens'. They are not people. They are not human beings.

---

"inbred right wing loonies that put him there"

You see, here's your problem trying to generalize 63 million US citizens.

---