it's a long one:
i was thinking about the war today. and about why it's going on and what's happening here and trying to see the big picture.
the anti-war argument is something along the lines of:
it is a pre-emptive strike, and there's something just wrong about throwing the first punch.
this war is bad for the economy.
the war makes us more susceptable to terrorism
it's pissing the world off at america
people are going to die...
it's rich white men profiting from this.
this war serves to secure oil and increase US dominance in the middle east.
now... of the arguments, there are two different kinds. one kind is a material argument against going to war. the other is more an accusation... a suspected motivation for an alleged crime.
maybe it was a bad call to go to war because it's hurting our economy and our relations with allies. maybe it was a bad idea because it's going to increase anti-american sentiment.
in the anti-war camp, we often see 'no war for oil', and 'no war for empire'... this must imply that the war is 'injust' and a 'crime'.
when the war is judged on grounds of right vs. wrong, we have to ask, "what is it that is morally wrong about this?"
the arguments are made, and we either agree that this war is about oil and power, or we don't. but the question of, it is Wrong? has not been answered. are we profiting from violence against the people of another nation? are the iraqi people suffering for our gain?
on tv today, i saw a statue of saddam hussien being toppled. surrounding it was a huge crowd of cheering iraqis. i have a feeling that the people of iraq must be excited about the end of the 30-year reign of dictator saddam hussein. they must be excited about the future, about the end of sanctions, and a new iraq. i think the iraqi people really are being liberated here. some may be skeptical of this, and yes, only time will tell. whether this whole thing was Right or Wrong will not be answered until we see the state of iraq years from now.
as of april tenth, 1174 is the high count for iraqi civilian deaths since this has began. this many. iraq is a country of 24 million people. at 1174 deaths, that means one out of every 20,444 iraqi people has died from this. so far, we've killed .005% of their civilian population. if saddam's been keeping up with most of his normal activities in spite of the war, his regime itself has probably killed more. in a few weeks, the 30 year reign of saddam hussein will be over. iraq will be a new kind of nation in the world. the average iraqi is probably celebrating.
whether you agree with the approach or not, america's foriegn policy mainly has always been about ensuring what's best for america, not about intervening on moral grounds. we haven't stood in the way of tyrants in the past because really, as this war proves, it's quite hard to sell a war.
this time around, US interest favors the removal of saddam. we've got people in washington who want it to happen. this is very fortunate for the people of iraq. what america's leadership is thinking, and what the motives maybe be, are not concerns to the iraqi people. they do not care if the US is doing this to get oil or power.
they do not care if the case for chemical weapons is flimsy or that saddam had nothing to do with 9-11, but they're sure glad foxnews is telling the average american otherwise.
it comes down to the iraqi people... is this war good for them? or is it not? do they support it? do they not support it? will they benefit? will this hurt them?
the answers are the answers to the question, "is this right or wrong?"
if the iraq people will suffer from this, if they want saddam, then this is wrong.
if not though, this war cannot be said to be morally wrong, at least not by any of the arguments currently being presented.
going to war may be opposed as unwise or unskillful, but not wrong.
Reasons Against Going to War:
-increased threat of terrorism.
-cost.
-international opinion.
Reasons for War:
-freeing the iraqis.
-ridding the region of an aggressive dictator
can this be right? america is sticking is just sticking it's neck out for the iraqi people and the safety of iraq's neighbors, though it's dangerous and detrimental to america? of course it's not...
"oil" and "power" don't belong in the "reasons against the war" list... they belong on the ones for it. some people in america stand to gain from this. surprise. so do the iraqis. the only people that don't are the ba'ath party and the soldiers.
i can't predict the future. will the people of iraq benefit from this? if yes, then this war is just. will america benefit from this? if yes, then this war is skillful.
as long as i think that the iraqis themselves stand to benefit from this, and i really believe they do, i cannot attack the war on grounds of ethics.
i'm not so sure about the war benefiting america though. i'm not so sure if it was a good choice.
one thing i do know is that i don't like all of the "us vs. them", "american vs. unamerican", patriot-act shit going on. there is definitely some very unamerican shit going on right now in america in connection with the war, and it to me it's of greater concern than the conflict itself.
time will tell whether this war was smart or foolish, and right or wrong.
Edited by mushmaster (04/10/03 11:49 AM)
|