objects

Home | Community | Message Board

You are not signed in.
New Account

Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post

Pages: 1

mr crisper
.

Registered: 07/24/00
Posts: 928

objects

#1260935 - 01/30/03 06:04 AM (23 years, 6 months ago)

any object is simply a thought, or series of thoughts, clothed in energy.

Extras:

Top

RebelSteve33
Amateur Mycologist

Registered: 05/28/02
Posts: 3,774
Loc: Arizona

Re: objects

[Re: mr crisper]
#1261063 - 01/30/03 07:01 AM (23 years, 6 months ago)

no, it's really not at all. a rock is not made up of thoughts. it's made up of elements which are made up of atoms. no thoughts involved.

what a silly person you are! :wink:

--------------------
Namaste.

Extras:

Top

Revelation
ॐ

Registered: 08/04/01
Posts: 6,135
Loc: heart cave

Re: objects

[Re: RebelSteve33]
#1261114 - 01/30/03 07:14 AM (23 years, 6 months ago)

Do we perceive the rock, though? Or do we form ideas about the rock and become acquainted with them?

--------------------

Extras:

Top

RebelSteve33
Amateur Mycologist

Registered: 05/28/02
Posts: 3,774
Loc: Arizona

Re: objects

[Re: Revelation]
#1261135 - 01/30/03 07:20 AM (23 years, 6 months ago)

what's the difference? i'm not sure i understand what you're trying to say...

--------------------
Namaste.

Extras:

Top

mr crisper
.

Registered: 07/24/00
Posts: 928

Re: objects

[Re: RebelSteve33]
#1261138 - 01/30/03 07:20 AM (23 years, 6 months ago)

yes and atoms are made of energy
e=mc2.......unless you beg to differ.
now we get down to - who thought of the rock in the first place?
who uttered us?

Extras:

Top

matts
matts

Registered: 01/28/02
Posts: 3,649

Re: objects

[Re: mr crisper]
#1261175 - 01/30/03 07:32 AM (23 years, 6 months ago)

Post deleted by Administrator

Extras:

Top

mr crisper
.

Registered: 07/24/00
Posts: 928

Re: objects

[Re: matts]
#1261193 - 01/30/03 07:39 AM (23 years, 6 months ago)

i'm not trying to be funny.
i said objects are thoughts clothed in energy.
i agree thoughts are not energy.

Quote:

complex systems of energy may produce a thought in a living organism

could you give one example? do you mean like "i'm horny"? dig deeper.
how did the complex systems of energy come to be?

Extras:

Top

Revelation
ॐ

Registered: 08/04/01
Posts: 6,135
Loc: heart cave

Re: objects

[Re: RebelSteve33]
#1261196 - 01/30/03 07:39 AM (23 years, 6 months ago)

Well, do we *know* objects directly, or do we just think we know them?

If ideas are derived from two sources - sense perception and reflection, and all knowledge is restricted to ideas..then that would mean that we do not really know objects or things, but rather we develop ideas around what we think they are.

Reality would be basically unknowable to us.

I tend to think that we have an ability to know the universe directly.

Edit: Which doesn't actually relate that much to the original post, now that I think about it..

--------------------

Edited by Revelation (01/30/03 07:40 AM)

Extras:

Top

mr crisper
.

Registered: 07/24/00
Posts: 928

Re: objects

[Re: Revelation]
#1261218 - 01/30/03 07:50 AM (23 years, 6 months ago)

nice thoughts revelation
i ponder that we get some information about objects thru our physical senses, but as the hierophant indicates, this is not full story.

Quote:

Reality would be basically unknowable to us.

yes, whilst wearing our monkey suits we are limited in our perception of reality.
there are some intrepid souls who choose to only accept the reality provided by their senses.

Extras:

Top

the_Landotter
Gnostic Chaoist

Registered: 05/24/02
Posts: 340
Loc: R'lyeh

Re: objects

[Re: mr crisper]
#1261359 - 01/30/03 08:31 AM (23 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

yes, whilst wearing our monkey suits we are limited in our perception of reality.

"Conditions in Time are ferocious. Our suits begin to break down after 20 or 30 years."

I like my time-suit. It's been holding up well. I'm slowly having it converted into a fiction-suit however. Fiction-suits last MUCH longer.

And you can get a pin-striping package. With ground effects!

:cool:

--------------------
* * * * * * * * * *
Read the Landotter's Mystical Journey Journal

Extras:

Top

Jump to top

Pages: 1

Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology

Similar Threads	Poster	Views	Replies	Last post
Direction and a place to start?	Tasty_Smurf_House	1,423	9	08/25/03 07:36 AM by Sole_Worthy
can you prove the existence of absolute, objective morality? ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )	Anonymous	22,730	157	12/21/04 06:31 AM by deafpanda
doors of perception	matt66	1,137	5	05/15/02 04:32 AM by gnrm23
Objective Quality....an inquiry into values......	PsyllyMe	1,034	13	08/19/04 10:58 AM by BlueCoyote
objective and subjective states of mind	Grav	2,390	5	03/18/03 11:21 AM by Cherk
Confusing creativity with perception. ( 1 2 3 all )	Phluck	6,061	59	09/30/03 02:02 AM by fireworks_god
objective reality does not exist ( 1 2 all )	monoamine	6,579	34	11/01/02 08:55 AM by Newbie2000
Karma = objective morality ( 1 2 all )	deafpanda	4,526	30	01/12/05 12:46 AM by fresh313

Extra information

You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
619 topic views. 1 members, 422 guests and 21 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]