fireworks_god said:

Maybe you'll be ready to be a moderator here in a couple years. Right now it seems that you might be a little preoccupied with how others think of you.

---

fireworks_god said:

There's probably more chances of that occurring than obtaining an answer from someone that seems reluctant to explain themselves into futher detail.

---

Why should I feel the need to explain myself when I know what I'm talking about?

I already know what I'm talking about, and I'm not the one misunderstanding.

There seems to be some hypocrisy going on here.

Who isn't preoccupied with they way others think of them?  It's the way of each of our own unique personalities.  We each have our own shadows.  If nobody were preoccupied in that sense, nobody would be posting here.

MushroomTrip said:

Quote:

deranger said:ME FOR MOD?

---

Probably for the www.stupidforums.com

---

what a perfect position for him!

deranger said:

fireworks_god said:

There's probably more chances of that occurring than obtaining an answer from someone that seems reluctant to explain themselves into futher detail.

---

Why should I feel the need to explain myself when I know what I'm talking about?

I already know what I'm talking about, and I'm not the one misunderstanding.

There seems to be some hypocrisy going on here.

Who isn't preoccupied with they way others think of them?  It's the way of each of our own unique personalities.  We each have our own shadows.  If nobody were preoccupied in that sense, nobody would be posting here.

---

elementswrath said:

i am one of those who really doesn't care about who thinks of me as what.
i used too but now i got over it.

---

fireworks_god said:

deranger said:

No I just find it amusing and entertaining the way others think of me.

---

Exactly as I said.

---

@fireworks_god

i like watching a basketball game.
but i dont care who wins.


now..

go back..


might make more sense.

meditating would get you nowhere..

@deranger

                        ^

thats how you talk to computers





.....

deranger said:

Why should I feel the need to explain myself when I know what I'm talking about?

---

elementswrath said:

deranger said:

fireworks_god said:

There's probably more chances of that occurring than obtaining an answer from someone that seems reluctant to explain themselves into futher detail.

---

Why should I feel the need to explain myself when I know what I'm talking about?

I already know what I'm talking about, and I'm not the one misunderstanding.

There seems to be some hypocrisy going on here.

Who isn't preoccupied with they way others think of them?  It's the way of each of our own unique personalities.  We each have our own shadows.  If nobody were preoccupied in that sense, nobody would be posting here.

---

i am one of those who really doesn't care about who thinks of me as what.
i used too but now i got over it.

---

Quote:

Yes, because it proves to me and some others the lack of one's ability to understand and think outside of context.

---

Quote:

like i said, i'm speaking from a different context.  i agree with your context, but yours is different.

---

It's like the thousand time I hear you replying with these lines, to different people. Maybe it's time to either work on changing them a bit just for the sake of variation, or maybe think about the fact that there's a possibility that you're the one who can't stay coherent and well articulated.

deranger said:

I originally had the intention to communicate differently.  Not in the sense of communication you are commonly used to.

---

Quote:

Yes, because it proves to me and some others the lack of one's ability to understand and think outside of context.

---

Meaning exists within context. No one can understand "outside of context".
It really isn't much of an accomplishment to keep the context of a vague statement secretive to create the impression for oneself that the other person doesn't understand, or even to keep them from understanding.
Personally, I see a lot of likely possibilities of what you meant when you said "not really. different contexts".
The odds are that I understand exactly what you were saying with it.
The fact of the matter, however, is that I am an honest debater. I try to hold myself to the ideal that I am only discussing what is presented, that which has been placed on the table for discussion.

That is because this forum is specifically intended for ideological discussion.
When you dismiss my assertion that it was exactly as I said, only with "not really. different contexts", you haven't expressed an idea. Its as vague as can be. What is "different contexts"? Do you mean to say that two things are in different contexts"? Are you talking about your response regarding what you find amusing, as opposed to my statement that you seem to be a little preoccupied with how others think of you, as being in different contexts? Which contexts would these be? What context was my statement in that somehow excludes your affirmation regarding what you think concerning others?

I've never found it difficult to actually express context, as opposed to merely alluding to it and refusing to elaborate on it.

fireworks_god said:

Meaning exists within context. No one can understand "outside of context".

---