Study: Universe could end in 10 billion years

Home | Community | Message Board

You are not signed in.
New Account

Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post

Pages: 1 | 2 | Next > [ show all ]

Smack31
Stranger

Registered: 06/17/02
Posts: 10,681

Study: Universe could end in 10 billion years

#900899 - 09/23/02 02:36 AM (23 years, 10 months ago)

Study: Universe could end in 10 billion years
September 18, 2002 Posted: 9:54 AM EDT (1354 GMT)

After the Big Bang, is a fatal contraction inevitable?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Richard Stenger
CNN

(CNN) -- Stanford University researchers theorize that the universe could experience a cosmic crunch in 10 billion or 20 billion years.

Recent cosmological observations have suggested that the universe will expand at an increasingly rapid rate for at least 100 billion years and perhaps enlarge forever.

But according to a new scientific model, the universe will slow its pace of acceleration and then experience a fatal contraction.

"The universe may be doomed to collapse and disappear. Everything we see now, and at a much larger distance that we cannot see, will collapse into a point smaller than a proton," said Andrei Linde, who conducted the research with Renata Kallosh, his wife and physics colleague at Stanford.

"The standard vision at the moment is that the universe is speeding up, so we were surprised to find that a collapse could happen with such a short amount of time," Linde said.

Linde is one of the pioneers of Inflation theory, an increasingly popular revision of the proposed Big Bang.

First advanced in the 1980s, it suggests that the universe rapidly inflated into a much larger cosmos only a fraction of a moment after it began.

Will the universe expand forever and become cool and dark, collapse into nothingness in a cosmic crunch, or remain in equilibrium between the forces of gravity and expansion?

Inflationary theory predicts a "flat" universe, or one where the competing forces pulling and contracting the universe stay balanced.

The debate, by no means settled among cosmologists, hinges on the role of mysterious and theoretical phenomena known as dark matter and dark energy.

Throw into the mix such notions as string theory, supergravity, extra dimensions and multiple universes, and the question becomes even more muddled.

Yet looking at some of the best work in the field of dark energy, Linde and Kallosh concluded it would change from a positive to a negative force.

Their cosmological model, described in related reports on www.arXiv.org, a Web site sponsored by the National Science Foundation and Cornell University, generated another unexpected prediction: the universe, estimated to be about 14 billion years old, is already middle-aged.

"Physicists have known that dark energy could become negative and the universe could collapse sometime in the distant future, perhaps a trillion years," Linde said. "But now we see that we might be not in the beginning, but in the middle of the life cycle of our universe."

One noted scientist had a lukewarm response to the hypothesis.

"Because their proposal is based on rather specific models and assumptions and their is no current evidence for it, I would say it logically possible, but not compelling," said physicist Paul Steinhardt.

The Princeton University professor helped developed an alternative cosmological theory that proposes that the universe began by colliding with another universe, with both existing in a higher dimensional medium.

"They are only attempting to explain the evolution of the universe between now and the collapse, whereas we showed how this can be embedded in a larger cyclic scenario that leads to an eternal universe," Steinhardt said.

Linde concedes that the work is raw and that astronomy is an inexact science at best, and known for continuous revisions. Recalling an ongoing joke among cosmologists, the Stanford University professor quipped:

"Astrophysicists are always in error but never in doubt."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"uhhhhhhh.... okay"

Extras:

Similar Threads	Poster	Views	Replies	Last post
Implications of the Big Bang Origin and Fate of the Universe ( 1 2 3 all )	Source	6,952	41	09/07/04 11:01 PM by gettinjiggywithit
Stanford announces plans to clone human embryos ( 1 2 all )	GoBlue!	2,749	34	12/12/02 11:24 AM by raytrace
10% of brain usage myth ( 1 2 3 all )	Swami	6,585	57	10/09/01 08:51 AM by Crobih
astronomical transitions	gnrm23	465	3	12/17/03 02:11 PM by SpecialEd
On Being a 10" Skep Dick	Swami	920	10	06/23/03 02:41 PM by Sclorch
Expand your mind	CrazyShroomMan	708	6	06/10/04 07:04 PM by Digs
Billions of Earths... (web article)	Ulysees	705	3	01/30/02 10:50 PM by Anonymous
Base 10 ( 1 2 all )	SpecialEd	3,203	29	02/04/04 11:09 PM by Evolving