Home | Community | Message Board

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

PhytoExtractum Shop: Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >  [ show all ]
OfflineRogerRabbitV
Bans for Pleasure
Male User Gallery

Registered: 03/26/03
Posts: 42,214
Loc: Seattle
Last seen: 11 months, 3 days
Seahawks vs Bears
    #6444992 - 01/10/07 11:40 AM (17 years, 22 days ago)

I see nobody is giving the Seahawks a chance in this one. I hope you're all wrong. Remember, the Bears have their own set of problems. I call it Seattle by a field goal.
RR


--------------------
Download Let's Grow Mushrooms



semper in excretia sumus solim profundum variat

"I've never had a failed experiment.  I've only discovered 10,000 methods which do not work."
Thomas Edison


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinecapliberty
Stranger
 User Gallery

Registered: 04/23/06
Posts: 1,949
Last seen: 14 years, 5 months
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: RogerRabbit]
    #6445191 - 01/10/07 12:29 PM (17 years, 22 days ago)

I think the crucial thing is that our TE play has to be good, if Stevens has a good game, then we have a chance, if not we lose.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineInfrared
sleeping
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/15/02
Posts: 12,988
Loc: Chicago, USA Flag
Last seen: 2 years, 4 days
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: capliberty]
    #6445221 - 01/10/07 12:44 PM (17 years, 22 days ago)

stevens is soft. hasselbeck is soft.

bears by 7


--------------------
When chemistry is outlawed.. Only outlaws have chemistry:rainbowdrink:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRogerRabbitV
Bans for Pleasure
Male User Gallery

Registered: 03/26/03
Posts: 42,214
Loc: Seattle
Last seen: 11 months, 3 days
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Infrared]
    #6445443 - 01/10/07 02:04 PM (17 years, 22 days ago)

Neither hasselbeck nor alexander seem to have come back from their injuries. I hate to say it, but the hawks were playing better with mo morris and seneca wallace.
RR


--------------------
Download Let's Grow Mushrooms



semper in excretia sumus solim profundum variat

"I've never had a failed experiment.  I've only discovered 10,000 methods which do not work."
Thomas Edison


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePat Bateman, VP
Dr. House's Inspiration
Female User Gallery

Registered: 10/15/04
Posts: 50,876
Loc: Inconceivable opulence
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: RogerRabbit]
    #6445542 - 01/10/07 02:38 PM (17 years, 22 days ago)

If the Hawks had anyone in the secondary, I'd give them more of a chance, but I think even Wrecks Glassman can manage not throwing three pics to fourth stringers.


--------------------
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?
No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone.

I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose...
Rapture.
-  Andrew Ryan

Formula: 0


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOldSpice
Geritol Breath...
Female User Gallery

Registered: 08/25/03
Posts: 59,080
Loc: Crankytown, Texas
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: RogerRabbit]
    #6446184 - 01/10/07 06:07 PM (17 years, 21 days ago)

I dont see the Bears losing to Seattle Roger
:undecided:


--------------------
So hard to be ....WDWGFH?
Texas is humongus compared to France
Our Gair, who art in Texas,
Paw Paw be thy Name....
My friends are thirsty


You never see a motorcycle parked outside a Psychiatrist office:biker:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRogerRabbitV
Bans for Pleasure
Male User Gallery

Registered: 03/26/03
Posts: 42,214
Loc: Seattle
Last seen: 11 months, 3 days
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: OldSpice]
    #6446836 - 01/10/07 09:04 PM (17 years, 21 days ago)

Maybe they'll all catch the flu or something and give us a chance. :laugh:
RR


--------------------
Download Let's Grow Mushrooms



semper in excretia sumus solim profundum variat

"I've never had a failed experiment.  I've only discovered 10,000 methods which do not work."
Thomas Edison


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOldSpice
Geritol Breath...
Female User Gallery

Registered: 08/25/03
Posts: 59,080
Loc: Crankytown, Texas
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: RogerRabbit]
    #6446950 - 01/10/07 09:30 PM (17 years, 21 days ago)

I hoping the Seahawks kick ass bigtime Roger but...
I really dont think they are gonna knock off the Bears
They only lost 3 games this year dude and 1 of them was to Green Bay when they played 3rd stringers against Farve :smirk:
Im just staying real with it my friend
You know shrooms I know Sports  :grin:


--------------------
So hard to be ....WDWGFH?
Texas is humongus compared to France
Our Gair, who art in Texas,
Paw Paw be thy Name....
My friends are thirsty


You never see a motorcycle parked outside a Psychiatrist office:biker:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleTHE KRAT BARON
one-eyed willie
Registered: 07/08/03
Posts: 42,409
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: RogerRabbit]
    #6447000 - 01/10/07 09:45 PM (17 years, 21 days ago)

Bears by 14.

However I'd LOVE to see an upset. :yesnod:


--------------------
m00nshine is currently vacationing in Maui. Rumor has it he got rolled by drunken natives and is currently prostituting himself in order to pay for airfare back to the mainland but he's having trouble juggling a hairon addiction. He won't be back for a long while.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOldSpice
Geritol Breath...
Female User Gallery

Registered: 08/25/03
Posts: 59,080
Loc: Crankytown, Texas
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: THE KRAT BARON]
    #6447024 - 01/10/07 09:53 PM (17 years, 21 days ago)

The cry baby Banez will even agree with me on a big bears win on this one
:smirk:


--------------------
So hard to be ....WDWGFH?
Texas is humongus compared to France
Our Gair, who art in Texas,
Paw Paw be thy Name....
My friends are thirsty


You never see a motorcycle parked outside a Psychiatrist office:biker:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBanez
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: OldSpice]
    #6448033 - 01/11/07 08:46 AM (17 years, 21 days ago)

yeah i do agree.. bears are going to take this one.. seahawks have nothing and got lucky ass fuck to beat dallas at their own stadium.. even with the 12th man.. unless rex just gift wraps multiple turnovers for TD's.. Chicago will win.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleZippoZM
Knomadic
 User Gallery

Registered: 06/17/03
Posts: 13,227
Loc: Pongyang, North Korea
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Banez]
    #6448061 - 01/11/07 08:55 AM (17 years, 21 days ago)

Go bears
were going to bring back the superbowl shuffle, like its 85 all over again, just wait and see.


--------------------
PEACE

:mushroom2:zippoz:mushroom2:



"in times of widespread chaos and confusion, it has been the duty of more advanced human beings - artists, scientists, clowns, and philosophers - to create order. In such times as ours however, when there is too much order, too much m management, too much programming and control, it becomes the duty of superior men and women and women to fling their favorite monkey wrenches into the machinery. To relieve the repression of the human spirit, they must sow doubt and disruption"

"People do it every day, they talk to themselves ... they see themselves as they'd like to be, they don't have the courage you have, to just run with it."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBanez
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: ZippoZ]
    #6448308 - 01/11/07 10:31 AM (17 years, 21 days ago)

yeah, i give them this win.. nothing beyond that.. esp if/ when they play the saints in the next round.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblecApTaInCrAp
Delightfullyexcellent
 User Gallery

Registered: 03/19/04
Posts: 2,613
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Banez]
    #6448643 - 01/11/07 12:25 PM (17 years, 21 days ago)

Dont forget the Bears had to go into OT with Tampa Bay(34-31?).... The same Tampa Bay a week later the Hawks faced and won 23-7 ..  :naughty:. I'm of course taking the Seattle Seahawks for the upset. With how awsome the depleted 2ndary played last week to shut down grossman and the WR's this week. I havnt heard any news on Trufants return or not but im wishful. Like i said last week the Hawks are low in the food chain with INT's but if its gonna happen its gonna be against the bears...it has to be...HAVE to win the turnover game and HAVE to watch our horrible special teams. 1 return is expected this week against the hawks but i better not see 2 fuking +.

  I loved watching Seneca and Morris(once he got in the groove)but they are second string for a reason and im glad they are back now. I do hope they throw Seneca in as WR again, last year against Carolina i think he had a sick sideline behind the shoulder catch.


--------------------
"...Terrific, im glad we've had this time to discuss..im outro, call me if you wanna blaze one up.."



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblebelligerent
Degenerate stoner
Male User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 10/31/06
Posts: 526
Loc: Hicksville, CA
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: RogerRabbit]
    #6448816 - 01/11/07 01:34 PM (17 years, 21 days ago)

I'll go out on a limb and pick the Seahawks in this game.

I think bad Rex might show up and it doesn't look like Lovie Smith is going to pull him quickly. I'm seeing a repeat of that godawful Chiefs game from the Bears side here.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBanez
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: belligerent]
    #6449151 - 01/11/07 02:49 PM (17 years, 21 days ago)

Rex didnt play shitty the entire season, and for the most part.. when he was called upon to win a game.. he did.. the only games he really fucked up were the games after the bears had clinched..

i think rex will be fine and the bears will beat up on a weak seattle team.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblecApTaInCrAp
Delightfullyexcellent
 User Gallery

Registered: 03/19/04
Posts: 2,613
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Banez]
    #6457115 - 01/13/07 11:51 PM (17 years, 18 days ago)



Games at 1 ET tomorrow, lets do this Hawks.


HAaaAaAAaWk


--------------------
"...Terrific, im glad we've had this time to discuss..im outro, call me if you wanna blaze one up.."



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblezorbman
blarrr
Male

Registered: 06/04/04
Posts: 5,952
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Banez]
    #6457136 - 01/14/07 12:00 AM (17 years, 18 days ago)

Quote:

Banez said:
Rex didnt play shitty the entire season, and for the most part.. when he was called upon to win a game.. he did.. the only games he really fucked up were the games after the bears had clinched..

i think rex will be fine and the bears will beat up on a weak seattle team.




I agree.

"Wrecks" Grossman will manage the game and the Bears will win.
They are damn hard to put down at Soldier Field.

The winner will go on to to lose to the Saints in the NFC championship game..


--------------------
“The crisis takes a much longer time coming than you think, and then it happens much faster than you would have thought.”  -- Rudiger Dornbusch


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDarkcloud
‮tiwkcuFtsilihiN
Male User Gallery

Registered: 04/06/03
Posts: 1,331
Loc: USA
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: RogerRabbit]
    #6457354 - 01/14/07 02:05 AM (17 years, 18 days ago)

I'm going for the Seahawks, even though the Bears have a better chance of winning. I'm hoping that luck helps Seattle out. It still comes down to the Saints no matter what.


--------------------
:poison: :poison: :poison:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleBanez
Stranger
Male User Gallery

Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Darkcloud]
    #6457889 - 01/14/07 08:21 AM (17 years, 18 days ago)

im starting to second guess the saints, they have by far the worse secondary that i have seen all season.

ill have to see who wins today before picking them for my superbowl.

Go Bears! (although if seattle wins id have much more confidence in the saints)

my thing with the bears, is that rex is fearless, he will throw the long ball much more often than garcia did last night, and has just as good of recievers as garcia.. bears could potentially shake things up, all depending on the play of rex though.


--------------------
Banez' PF Tek For Beginners


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next >  [ show all ]

PhytoExtractum Shop: Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* So...About those Bears... Madtowntripper 964 16 09/18/06 01:41 PM
by Madtowntripper
* Reasons The Bears Will Win The Super Bowl
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Madtowntripper 8,654 96 01/21/07 07:38 PM
by Infrared
* Bears v. Vikings... Madtowntripper 1,076 13 12/19/07 05:22 PM
by OneMoreRobot3021
* Bears-Cowboys, Sunday Night Football
( 1 2 all )
Madtowntripper 2,681 23 11/15/07 07:43 AM
by WhiskeyClone
* Bears v. Titans
( 1 2 all )
Madtowntripper 2,300 27 11/09/08 02:09 PM
by Atheist
* Bears v. Rams Madtowntripper 1,006 18 12/14/06 12:24 PM
by Infrared
* Official Colts vs. Bears Super Bowl Thread
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Dexter_Morgan 8,387 97 02/07/07 09:51 PM
by OldSpice
* Mom Induces Labor so Husband Can Watch Bears Win Madtowntripper 727 3 01/22/07 10:39 AM
by Liz

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: psilocybinjunkie, 13shrooms
5,972 topic views. 0 members, 1 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 16 queries.