|
belligerent
Degenerate stoner



Registered: 10/31/06
Posts: 526
Loc: Hicksville, CA
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: OldSpice]
#6458828 - 01/14/07 02:08 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
Woohoo!! OT!
This has been one hell of a game. Kinda sloppy, but it's been a great battle.
|
cApTaInCrAp
Delightfullyexcellent


Registered: 03/19/04
Posts: 2,613
|
|
AHH i hate OT, going on offense tho good but still very scary
-------------------- "...Terrific, im glad we've had this time to discuss..im outro, call me if you wanna blaze one up.."
|
Jadian
Ninja


Registered: 07/07/05
Posts: 7,404
Loc: The desert
Last seen: 6 years, 1 month
|
|
With any other Quarterback in the history of the league playing, Chicago would have won already. I honestly think Rex Grossman shouldn't even be in this league. He's good sometimes, but sometimes he's just plain stupid.
-------------------- LNC's official Alaskan stoner
 
|
Jadian
Ninja


Registered: 07/07/05
Posts: 7,404
Loc: The desert
Last seen: 6 years, 1 month
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Jadian]
#6458887 - 01/14/07 02:22 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
Nice kick.
-------------------- LNC's official Alaskan stoner
 
|
Pat Bateman, VP
Dr. House's Inspiration


Registered: 10/15/04
Posts: 50,876
Loc: Inconceivable opulence
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: OldSpice]
#6458888 - 01/14/07 02:22 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
Bears win, Gould kick OT.
Tank Johnson made up for his inequities with that last play sack in the fourth.
-------------------- Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor. No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God. No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone. I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose... Rapture. - Andrew Ryan
|
cApTaInCrAp
Delightfullyexcellent


Registered: 03/19/04
Posts: 2,613
|
|
Damn, good game :/
-------------------- "...Terrific, im glad we've had this time to discuss..im outro, call me if you wanna blaze one up.."
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
|
I pretty much piss excellence. 
close game though, im going to need to do some serious thinking before i make my pick between the saints and bears.
|
Infrared
sleeping


Registered: 07/15/02
Posts: 12,988
Loc: Chicago, USA
Last seen: 2 years, 4 days
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Banez]
#6458903 - 01/14/07 02:24 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
money
-------------------- When chemistry is outlawed.. Only outlaws have chemistry
|
iateshaggy
i haxor 360s


Registered: 05/20/05
Posts: 4,707
Loc: 612 Warf Avenue, next to....
Last seen: 1 month, 9 days
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Banez]
#6458907 - 01/14/07 02:24 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
i think we know how that's gonna be. the saint's want it more.
-------------------- You are a filipina sex goddess who wants to fuck me until I fall asleep, so then you can tickle my balls and see if the legend of my diamond filled nutsuck is true. I am a white man from costa rica, who smells like lime jello.
I can flash/jtag/repair 360's, pm for details.
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: iateshaggy]
#6458911 - 01/14/07 02:25 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
but its in chicago.
and the saints have by far the shittiest secondary i have ever seen.
|
Jadian
Ninja


Registered: 07/07/05
Posts: 7,404
Loc: The desert
Last seen: 6 years, 1 month
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: iateshaggy]
#6458919 - 01/14/07 02:26 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
And Grossman isn't good enough to win a big game.
-------------------- LNC's official Alaskan stoner
 
|
Infrared
sleeping


Registered: 07/15/02
Posts: 12,988
Loc: Chicago, USA
Last seen: 2 years, 4 days
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Infrared]
#6458924 - 01/14/07 02:27 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Infrared said: $$$$$$
-------------------- When chemistry is outlawed.. Only outlaws have chemistry
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Jadian]
#6458941 - 01/14/07 02:29 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Jadian said: And Grossman isn't good enough to win a big game.
i think he proved that theory wrong today, i thought he played very well.. took care of the ball, made some big throws.. took the bears to the next round.
he played better than hasselbeck did.
|
Darkcloud
tiwkcuFtsilihiN


Registered: 04/06/03
Posts: 1,331
Loc: USA
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Jadian]
#6458998 - 01/14/07 02:46 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Jadian said: And Grossman isn't good enough to win a big game.
I'm starting to think that way. He couldn't even exploit the two pickup guys in the Seahawks secondary. So, I don't think they will be able to stand up to the Saints. The Saints just need a good solid offense, and it will be over. That's my opinion, anyways.
EDIT: Rex did manage to screw the secondary over in the beginning, though. They were totally unprepared for that huge TD pass. After that, Rex couldn't do much against them.
Edited by Darkcloud (01/14/07 03:37 PM)
|
Jadian
Ninja


Registered: 07/07/05
Posts: 7,404
Loc: The desert
Last seen: 6 years, 1 month
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Banez]
#6459031 - 01/14/07 03:02 PM (17 years, 18 days ago) |
|
|
Are you kidding? Almot every time they needed points or a big play today he fucked it up.
The defense can only carry a team for so long, and certainly not all the way through the playoffs. They need to be carried on Grossman's limp wristed shoulders if they need to be carried at all.
-------------------- LNC's official Alaskan stoner
 
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Jadian]
#6459268 - 01/14/07 04:28 PM (17 years, 17 days ago) |
|
|
IMO the secondary of the seahawks is better than the secondary of the saints, did you see how the eagles picked apart their secondary.
im still picking the saints, but idk, im not very confident in my pick.
|
Jadian
Ninja


Registered: 07/07/05
Posts: 7,404
Loc: The desert
Last seen: 6 years, 1 month
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Banez]
#6459277 - 01/14/07 04:32 PM (17 years, 17 days ago) |
|
|
Basically, who's going to score more, New Orleans offense or the Bears defense? My safe money is on the Saints offense.
-------------------- LNC's official Alaskan stoner
 
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Jadian]
#6459282 - 01/14/07 04:33 PM (17 years, 17 days ago) |
|
|
we'll have to wait and see, it doesnt do any good for me to keep debating it..
i still want to think about it a little more before i lock in my pick.. i want to look at the weather for next weekend, look at some game stats, and then make my pick.. i know its anal, but as long as SD holds on against NE ill be 7 for 8 in my picks.
|
Banez
Stranger


Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 15,181
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Banez]
#6459293 - 01/14/07 04:37 PM (17 years, 17 days ago) |
|
|
i think the surface of the fields and the weather is going to play a bigger role than people think, not to mention home field advantage.
next weekend its supposed to be somewhere between 24-32 degrees, compared to New Orleans where its been in the upper 60's, low 70's.
playing on turf and sod are completely different and will really take away the speed of the saints offense.
|
OldSpice
Geritol Breath...


Registered: 08/25/03
Posts: 59,080
Loc: Crankytown, Texas
|
Re: Seahawks vs Bears [Re: Banez]
#6459401 - 01/14/07 05:15 PM (17 years, 17 days ago) |
|
|
Yes its gonna be hard for NO to beat the Bears at Soldier field on a sod turf in the cold The only pick i crashed on this weekend was the NO Eagles game
-------------------- So hard to be ....WDWGFH? Texas is humongus compared to France Our Gair, who art in Texas, Paw Paw be thy Name.... My friends are thirsty
You never see a motorcycle parked outside a Psychiatrist office
|
|