Auto-SummaryThis forum post passionately argues against the idea that evil (Hitler-like behavior) is necessary for good (Gandhi-like behavior) to exist. The author contends that free will allows individuals to choose their actions and that Hitler and Gandhi both had agency. The post questions the notion that one must engage in heinous acts to appreciate goodness, using examples like needing darkness to see light or pollution to value clean water. It asserts that light and goodness can exist without the need for darkness and badness, suggesting that the belief in this duality is a form of manipulation to justify harmful actions. The author encourages readers to think critically and feel with their hearts, emphasizing that goodness and light can be appreciated in their own right without the need for evil.
Quote: the same God who created Ghandi also created Hitler.
So Ghandi and Hitler had no say in their thoughts words and actions?
What happened to free will?
Ghandi created what he became and so did Hitler, using free will of choice.
Just because I could tear into someones head with a pitch fork, should I?
If we go by what you say, we all might as well live really heinous, malicious and despicable lives, as long as we manufacture a good reason for it? 
Are you actually saying that there is good reason for Hitlers? 
It's all silly excuses people use to justify their own inner Hitlers behaviors.
"The light needs the dark, to be" they say 
"The good needs the bad, to be" they say 
I say Bull caca. 
I use to reason that stuff to myself too because it comes across sounding so "wise" and "cool" to feel/think that you can accept all thats fucked up in the world. you can even get so brainwashed that you begin to believe that you can be Hitleresque and you are doing the world a favor, "because the world needs the darkness and the bad." 
It's all a bunch of desensitizing propaganda so il hearted, il minded, and il willing beings can justify themselves. Get enough to deeply buy into the crapola and you may even get supported for being Il hearted, il minded and il willed.
"Lets take the people with common good sense and desensitize them, so they no longer have senses." 
"Let's feed them bullcaca ideas about spiritual strength training to toughening up to become calloused, the light needing the dark and the bad needing the good. Let's get them to believe that they can't have one without the other. "
"Lets ram it into their pee wee human minds so far that they will soon believe that their being calloused, hiding in the dark, and bad to the bone, is for the good of themselves and so others can know goodness and the light. They'll fall for it, yet again, suckas!
Children need to be molested so I can know good? 
Wars need to be in play so I can know peace? 
Darkness needs to exist for people to hide in so I can see in the light? 
I need people to pound on me until I am senseless so I can "toughen up" and learn how to take more senseless beatings in the future without whining about it? 
That stuff is all bull caca .
THINK and FEEL with your HEART and know its (toxic material).
Why does one kid have to be raised by bad parents so another can have good parents? That makes no sense.
The daylight is day light. If we had binary star system, the sun could always be shining, and we wouldn't know the darkness of the night, NOR would we need too, to be in sunlight.
You only need sunlight to be in sunlight. 
Some people say, "well, you wouldn't know it was what it was or be able to appreciate it without knowing life without it." More caca.
I've always had use of my legs and I appreciate them and know what they do for me. Like I need to loose use of them to appreciate them and know what they do for me? 
Saying we need the dark and bad so people can have and know the good and light is like saying, "We need legless people so people can know legs." 
It's like saying, "we need blind people so others can know they have vision and what vision is." 
It's like saying, "we need polluted toxic water so people can know and appreciate clean pure water." 
I can live a whole life near a fresh water stream and know it and appreciate it without ever having come across, polluted and toxic water.
How did it become so easy for people to believe, including myself at times, that we need the dark and bad for there to be the light and good?
There only needs to be light and good for their to be light and good. The bad and the dark doesn't get you to them. It's what you fall into when you loose the ability to sense the light and good within the self.
Bad needs lack of good to be bad.
Dark needs lack of light to be dark.
Good needs only itself, goodness, to be good.
Light needs only itself, the light, to be light.
All that blah blah sounds like, "Well um , how would I see my flashlight was ON unless it was dark outside? I need it to be night time for my flashlight to work." Does it not still shine its light during the day? Do you even need one if there is always natural light to see with?
Whose the wise guy who made the proverbial darkness fall so he could sell people his flashlights? He/She is smarter then us if we bought into that scam.
You want to be in the light and the good, to know the light and the good, and able to appreciate the light and the good? All it takes is getting your senses back. You always had them and never needed to not have them to know and appreciate them.
You also never needed an appreciation for the bad or the darkness of life to have and know the good and the light.
Did you need to crash a car, to know driving accident free was the ideal place to be? NO. Crashing a car just sucks and so does being in the bad and in the dark of life. It does nothing to make the accident free drives any better then they were before the crash.
People crash cars when they loose their driving senses is all. Same with life.
Anything that serves to callous you to desensitization is serving up a platter of bull caca. Bon appetite if you buy into the idea of the good and light needing anything but itself to be.
-------------------- Ahuwale ka nane huna.
|