Home | Community | Message Board


Vaposhop
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
InvisiblePsychoactive1984
PositiveCynicist
Male
Registered: 02/06/05
Posts: 3,546
Loc: California, Monterey Coun...
Bush's Snake Oil Plan
    #4125220 - 05/02/05 10:28 PM (11 years, 7 months ago)

http://alternet.org/story/21903/

Bush's Snake Oil Plan

By Roger Hickey, TomPaine.com. Posted April 30, 2005.


The president's Social Security proposal will hurt the very people he claims to want to help. Story Tools
EMAIL
PRINT
COMMENTS

Also in Top Stories

The Guards Are Sleeping
Gael Murphy, AlterNet

Is Arnold Losing It?
Mark Z. Barabak, Washington Monthly

Sister, Uncle Sam Wants You Too
Vanessa Huang, WireTap

Rediscovering Douglas Adams' DNA
Patrick Schabe, PopMatters


More stories by Roger Hickey



President Bush's staff signaled ahead of time that he would use his first prime-time news conference in ages to somehow give a shot in the arm to his floundering campaign for privatization. Instead, by giving a few more details about how specifically he would cut Social Security benefits, he managed to shoot himself in the foot--again.

With the president facing growing criticism over a troubled economy, increasing oil prices, continuing American deaths in Iraq, his embrace of Tom Delay's corporate corruption, and the sinking popularity of his Social Security plan, Bush's staff rolled out a proposal that only conservative Washington policy wonks could understand or love. And ironically, they put the president before the press to pose as a champion of the poor--which, translated from Bush-speak, means the cuts to retirement benefits for the poor will merely be less than the cuts he wants to make for "people who are better off."

Predictably, the instant pundits appearing on the big networks after the press conference bought the idea that Bush was just asking the rich to sacrifice a little in order to "save" Social Security for the poor. But over on the more populist MSNBC, former Republican congressman-turned-TV-host Joe Scarborough understood that President Bush was asking fellow Republicans to step out on a dangerous plank. Joe told Chris Matthews that the president was embracing the very unpopular idea of "means testing" Social Security benefits for the middle class. MSNBC then cut to Sam Brownback, conservative senator from Kansas, saying he personally didn't think "means testing" Social Security was the way to go.

Democrats got it a while ago, and that's why they are united against the president's privatization plan. Now smart Republican politicians, like Scarborough and Brownback, are starting to realize that the heart of Bush's privatization plan is dramatic and broadly unpopular cuts in Social Security benefits. Faced with strong public opposition, the Bush privatizers, behaving like the tired Republican stereotype of a Democrat, have decided to rearrange the pain in the name of fairness. The new Bush benefit cuts plan, authored by economist Robert Pozen, trades across-the-board benefit cuts for a system that maintains (for now) benefit increases--based on prices and wages--for the poor (those making less than $20,000). But because Bush claims to have his eye on long-term solvency for Social Security, this means that the rest of us would see big cuts in retirement benefits.

According to an analysis by House Democratic staff, when fully phased in, Bush's "progressive indexing" would be a disaster for the middle class: A worker earning $37,000 per year before retirement would see a benefit cut of 28 percent. Someone earning $58,000 would suffer a 42 percent cut. And someone earning $90,000 would face benefit cuts of 49 percent.

Oddly, the president's remarks included the repeated assurance that "future generations receive benefits equal to or greater than the benefits today's seniors get." This sounds like a pledge to cut no one's future benefits, echoing some in the Republican "free lunch" crowd. But smart journalists will force the White House to acknowledge that this is an empty and misleading promise. What the president described last night is entirely compatible with dramatic cuts in future benefits--which, under current law, are promised to increase substantially as wages and inflation go up. This is a bait and switch of the kind bloggers will be all over in their Friday postings.

The new "soak the rich" posture of the Bush White House is improbable and tortured. Karl Rove certainly understands that a family making $58,000 is not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. But, having cast their lot with benefit cuts for Social Security, Bush and his allies are desperately trying to pretend this sow's ear is a silk purse. If they really wanted to call on wealthy Americans to sacrifice a little to make Social Security solvent for the poor and the middle class, Bush and his minions would embrace lifting the cap on incomes subject to the Social Security tax. Currently, Bill Gates and other millionaires pay payroll taxes on only their first $90,000--and nothing after that. But when Bush once hinted that he might consider lifting the cap, he was instantly smacked down by the anti-tax zealots in his own party, including Denny Hastert and Tom DeLay.

Will reporters and editorialists for major newspapers and networks buy Bush's claim that his benefit cuts will spare the poor? Not if they bother to look past the White House spin. Don't expect advocates for low-income Americans, like the NAACP or the League of United Latin American Citizens, to embrace his plan. They are smart enough to know that Social Security was a success for low-income people because it was the one program that treated all Americans alike and therefore enjoyed the support of strong American majorities. The plan advanced in Bush's press conference would transform Social Security from a progressive but universally popular program into a welfare program--where all earners would receive the same benefit regardless of their earnings. If we let this happen, support for the program would erode, leaving the poor people's benefits extremely vulnerable.

The other major news about Social Security last night was Bush's insistence that he would not abandon private accounts. This cuts off an avenue of retreat and potential compromise for the Republicans. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley has recently hinted that he might produce a bill aimed solely at achieving 70-year solvency for Social Security--though undoubtedly via the approved Republican route of benefit cuts and higher retirement age--rather than by creating private accounts.

The bottom line emerging from last night's press conference is that Bush will continue his unpopular push to create risky Wall Street private accounts by diverting funds from Social Security taxes and the trust fund. And doing so will assure continued public focus on his unpopular middle-class benefit cuts and unpopular increases in the deficit--which would otherwise not have to be so large and painful.

But the real headline from last night's press conference is even more destructive to the White House hopes for majority support: "Bush embraces means testing to determine middle-class Social Security benefit cuts."

President Bush and his surrogates have been on the road for 60 days trying to sell his plan. When he started, 55 percent of Americans thought privatization was a bad idea. And last week, USA Today reported that 61 percent now think privatizing Social Security is a bad idea. Bush's White House has just announced that the president is going to keep going. And privatization opponents say go ahead. "Keep flying around in Air Force One. And keep talking about your privatization plan-- and especially about means testing to cut middle class benefits." We'll meet him every where he goes--with rallies to give people the basic information about his benefit cuts and growing deficits--as we did over the last 60 days. And soon there won't be any Americans who support this terrible idea.


--------------------
"Their is one overriding question that concerns us all: How can we get out of the fatal groove we are in, the one that is leading towards the brink?" Albert Szent-Gyorgyi
"We may not be capable of eradicating the corruption of reason, but we must nevertheless counter it at every instance and with every means." Dan Agin
"Politics is the best religion and politicians are the worst followers."
-It's ok to trip as long as you don't fall.
-Substance over Style.
-Common sense is uncommon.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCatalysis
EtherealEngineer

Registered: 04/23/02
Posts: 1,742
Last seen: 8 years, 5 months
Re: Bush's Snake Oil Plan [Re: Psychoactive1984]
    #4125306 - 05/02/05 10:47 PM (11 years, 7 months ago)

I found this interesting..

Quote:

"Bush embraces means testing to determine middle-class Social Security benefit cuts."




I would think the democrats should favor this as it theoretically preserves SS for the poor and doesn't allow them to make the "risky investments" of privatization. Of course im gonna be pissed when I undoubtedly fall below the cutoff point and am forced to stay on this ridiculous social security plan.

All i can say is that as a lower-middle class earner, SS is my biggest financial burden next to my rent. Im sure I will be forever dreaming of what I could do with the money that I will never get back.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisiblePsychoactive1984
PositiveCynicist
Male
Registered: 02/06/05
Posts: 3,546
Loc: California, Monterey Coun...
Re: Bush's Snake Oil Plan [Re: Catalysis]
    #4125387 - 05/02/05 11:09 PM (11 years, 7 months ago)

It's sad isn't it?


--------------------
"Their is one overriding question that concerns us all: How can we get out of the fatal groove we are in, the one that is leading towards the brink?" Albert Szent-Gyorgyi
"We may not be capable of eradicating the corruption of reason, but we must nevertheless counter it at every instance and with every means." Dan Agin
"Politics is the best religion and politicians are the worst followers."
-It's ok to trip as long as you don't fall.
-Substance over Style.
-Common sense is uncommon.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineJesusChrist
Son Of God
Registered: 02/19/04
Posts: 1,459
Last seen: 4 years, 2 months
Re: Bush's Snake Oil Plan [Re: Psychoactive1984]
    #4129017 - 05/03/05 08:06 PM (11 years, 7 months ago)

Bush's idea will eventually be enacted in some form. It can not happen any other way. I am surprised that so many people are up in arms about it.

Social Security is currently insolvent. It cannot afford to pay future benefits. Most of the people that read this board are in the age group that is affected.

To make Social Security solvent, you can do two things.

1) Cut Benefits

2) Raise Taxes

An interesting thing happens when you raise social security taxes. Social Security is in theory a program that pays you back. If you take more revenue from people, you are only increasing your liabilities down the line. That option comes out a wash in the long run, so you are right where you started with an insolvent system.

The only remaining solution is to cut benefits. And benefits will eventually be cut. If we cut them now, it can be gradual and it takes some of the sting out of it. The longer we wait, be it 1, 5, 10, 15 years, the more drastic those cuts will become. It is a simple matter of demographics and economics. The longer we wait to address this problem, that tougher the outcome.

Now when we do eventually get around to cutting benefits, whose benefits are going to be cut? Do you think we are going to take benefits away from elderly people living below the poverty level? Those are just the people that the system was designed for, and the people most reliant on the social safety net. It won't happen.

And since we won't cut their benefits, the benefit cuts have to go somewhere else.

George Bush is right about this. It really is the only solution. The only reason that people don't like it is because it is George Bush saying it.


--------------------
Tastes just like chicken


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCatalysis
EtherealEngineer

Registered: 04/23/02
Posts: 1,742
Last seen: 8 years, 5 months
Re: Bush's Snake Oil Plan [Re: JesusChrist]
    #4129043 - 05/03/05 08:14 PM (11 years, 7 months ago)

Quote:

The only reason that people don't like it is because it is George Bush saying it.




Exactly.

Of course the needy elderly should always have a social saftey net in any civilized society. However, my fathers side of the family is very wealthy so I see people just using SS money as a little extra pocket change all the time. This money is also coming from the poor who are forced to pay ridiculous percentages of their check to SS.

I would think the Dems should be first in line to support reform if they really followed the principals that made their party great. It seems their only goal now is to obstruct government in every way, shape, and form until they are back in power.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinezappaisgod
horrid asshole

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 6 months, 4 days
Re: Bush's Snake Oil Plan [Re: Catalysis]
    #4129199 - 05/03/05 08:59 PM (11 years, 7 months ago)

Listen kiddies and listen well. This group of youngsters needs to vote in it's own self interest and get behind any kind of Soc Sec elimination that it can, no matter how much you hate the messenger. I think most of you know what a disaster it is. How can you support Dhimmicrats who want to maintain the illusion of a status quo when any rational person can see it is a oneway train to nowhere?


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibledownforpot
Stranger
Male
Registered: 06/25/01
Posts: 5,715
Re: Bush's Snake Oil Plan [Re: zappaisgod]
    #4129749 - 05/03/05 10:50 PM (11 years, 7 months ago)

I'm moving back to Russia, oh wait, that's fucked too unless Putin fixes it.


--------------------



http://www.myspace.com/4th25


"And I don't care if he was handcuffed
Then shot in his head
All I know is dead bodies
Can't fuck with me again"


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway zorbman 1,072 9 10/30/06 09:28 PM
by AlteredAgain
* Bush warns 'oil overcharge' firm daussaulit 509 3 12/29/03 05:38 PM
by luvdemshrooms
* "Return of the King" part of Bush's evil plan? Phred 352 1 12/22/03 10:48 AM
by Phred
* Bush's Oil Policy
( 1 2 all )
mjshroomer 1,243 27 02/04/03 03:22 PM
by Azmodeus
* UN on trial and Bush is the judge carbonhoots 470 3 03/04/03 11:48 PM
by Ellis Dee
* How Would You Fix Social Security, Senator Kerry?
( 1 2 all )
Ancalagon 2,661 31 08/16/04 10:55 PM
by Ancalagon
* Lets get it on: Bush and SS reform.
( 1 2 all )
Catalysis 2,198 24 02/04/05 07:52 AM
by zappaisgod
* Greenspan Pushes for Social Security Fixes
RandalFlagg
393 3 03/16/05 02:21 AM
by Psychoactive1984

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
696 topic views. 4 members, 0 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Kraken Kratom
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.074 seconds spending 0.002 seconds on 14 queries.