The following rant presupposes that all events are predetermined by events before it and chaos is but an illusion of an ordered universe.
The Universe is expanding. Most everything is drifting farther and farther away from everything else. Let's say that we traced all this mass back to a single point and sent a pilot, in a ship, in that direction. Now, our calculations wouldn't be exact but that suits us fine; if we got our calculations exactly right there would be a bizarre crash with another ship... more on that later.
Get out your favorite mental picture of what the Big Bang was like; I have a few amendments to it. Instead of a big bang that explodes like a toilet flushing a cherry bomb, with random sized shards and water droplets flying off at high speeds in different directions, imagine a Big Bang that explodes geometrically. For each shard that goes whizzing in one direction there is another shard that goes whizzing in the opposite direction. For each gumby shaped nugget traveling at a million miles a second in one direction, there is an inverted mirror gumby rotated 180 degrees traveling at the same rate. If you noticed I just said the same thing twice in a row please note it was only for reiteration purposes; I want you, the reader, to understand this concept.
The Big Bang was a long long time ago, but in the model I just described, where everything has a geometric counterpart, any event that occurred on one side would also have occurred on the other... but at an orientation where everything is reflected once on the y-axis, once on the x-axis, and once on the z-axis. To keep things simple (ha ha HA!) we will label everything on this side with an "A" and everything on that side with a "1"
This depiction lacks a 3rd dimension, but it is simulated by an z-axis. While Earth-A (to the left) is in the foreground quadrant, Earth-1 (to the right) is in the background.
Back to my example. Pilot-A in ship-A heads towards the center of the Universe on an approximated course at the same time that pilot-1 heads in ship-1 towards the center of the universe on an approximated course. If the course of ship-A were precise, then the same would be true for the course of ship-1 and the two ships would crash at the point where time begin. So, let's assume for now that the courses aren't perfect. As ship-A reaches the boundary of the A-half of the universe, it would have to stop... calculate the journey home as if it had turned around (but without doing so) then rotate 180 degrees and proceed on the reciprocal of the "return home" course. Where would this lead pilot-A? Earth-1! Of course, the pilot would find it very difficult to convince anybody on the planet that he was in fact somehow different from the pilot that had departed from it. It would be just as difficult for the pilot to come to terms with the fact that all the people, places, and things he has memories of are, in fact, a long distance away; especially when he confronts these familiar nouns. How could anyone possibly rationalize this experience without mass quantities of magic fungus?
I mean, can you imagine being this pilot and meeting yourself in the shared corridor breaching your ship and your's at the center of the universe? Even if it were possible for these ships to dock in such a bizarre configuration there would be practical disadvantages; you-A would be on the ground and you-1 would be on the ceiling, and of course you-1 would have the same orientation towards you-A. Any verbal greeting, such as "Hello," could only be returned by saying the same thing twice. Such frustrating conversation would probably go something like this: "Hello... yeah, Hi. Hey, would you quit that? It's really creeping me o-- wtf, dude, STFU!" It might be best, after all, to keep your mouth shut with a smile and attempt an awkward handshake or a high-five in the middle of the corridor and then get the hell out of there.
Then there are philosophical quandaries. Do we consider our counterparts separate entities, or do we consider them reflections of ourselves in a bizarre event horizon mirror? The later seems to be more convenient, as the former would be very hard to prove. After all, you couldn't take any mass from the other side without the same mass being subtracted simultaneously from your own. But the idea of living in a universe that is structured like a level in a Super Mario game, where when you exit to the left of the screen and suddenly enter on the right, drives me nuts! I hope you have fun turning it over in your noodle. I know for certain my counterpart did.
Edited by TheShroomHermit (10/20/04 08:54 AM)
|