mushboy said:

Because people are dumb.

---

rxb said:

sudly said:

Oh damn, you can't read can you, sorry mate I didn't know you were special.

---

the debate style you are employing is like telling me i need sources for why i dont like ham when i said i didnt feel like eating spaghetti.

i cant make this more clear for you. she is bad at presenting herself as a serious candidate.

people loose brain cells when she speaks, so she wont be president.

---

Quote:

In the compassionate but clear-eyed prose that has won her so many avid readers, Williamson shows us that the principles which apply to our personal healing also apply to the healing of the larger world. Calling on Americans to turn the compassion in our hearts into a powerful force for social good, Williamson shows us how to transform spiritual activism into a social activism that will in turn transform America into a nation seriously invested in the hope of every child and in the potential of every adult.

---

sudly said:

\

You said she has stupid ideas so I asked what you mean \
\

---

sudly said:

So she wrote a self help book,

Quote:

In the compassionate but clear-eyed prose that has won her so many avid readers, Williamson shows us that the principles which apply to our personal healing also apply to the healing of the larger world. Calling on Americans to turn the compassion in our hearts into a powerful force for social good, Williamson shows us how to transform spiritual activism into a social activism that will in turn transform America into a nation seriously invested in the hope of every child and in the potential of every adult.

---

You can not like her for any reason, but if it's for her policy proposals, you have to be able to backup that to be taken seriously yourself.

---

ballsalsa said:

Her policies are irrelevant because she'll never get more than 0.5% of the vote.  She won't be the D nominee ever but especially not if the current D POTUS is alive and running for reelection.  She knows this but election campaigns are a great way to sell books so here we are.

---

Quote:

Joe Biden
64%

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
13%

Marianne Williamson
10%

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/01/us/elections/times-siena-poll-registered-voters-crosstabs.html

---

rxb said:

sudly said:

\

You said she has stupid ideas so I asked what you mean \
\

---

i mean her platform of beating trump with love.

---

ballsalsa said:

Kennedy has no chance.  Even if Biden didn't exist, neither of them would be the Dem candidate.

---

sudly said:

ballsalsa said:

Her policies are irrelevant because she'll never get more than 0.5% of the vote.  She won't be the D nominee ever but especially not if the current D POTUS is alive and running for reelection.  She knows this but election campaigns are a great way to sell books so here we are.

---

She's third in the Democratic primary shortly behind Kennedy, despite constant smears, downplaying and belittling. There's plenty of time for her to grow, and Biden knows it'll come from the debates if he shows his sorry face.

Quote:

Joe Biden
64%

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
13%

Marianne Williamson
10%

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/01/us/elections/times-siena-poll-registered-voters-crosstabs.html

---

Joe Biden is running away from all debates with her because he knows she'd chew his numbers down. Why aren't you bagging out Kennedy's chances? He's a crackpot conspiracy theorist loving fella who's only got off from name recognition.

---

Did you miss the ENTIRE thread of us dunking on how awful a candidate Kennedy is?  The answer to Biden being boring and Trump being a criminal is not a self-help new wave grifter.   This woman seems to elicit the same type of cult of personality response from you that Bernie Bros and Maga display towards their idols.  That in and of itself is a disqualifier in my book.  No one is so inspired by Biden that they would storm the capitol, these cult types though...