Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | | Last >
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: Bigbadwooof]
    #26470887 -

Bigbadwooof said:
Can I put - Koods at the end of the quote?


Sure, I think that's very appropriate given koods is the one always defending the NY Times.

(but it's probably a question for a mod to answer)


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: feldman114]
    #26470890 -

qman said:
I was told that the NYT's was the pinnacle of professional journalism. :cookiemonster:

Feldman, what's going on?????


Take the bet, Feldman!  :lol:

If you truly believe them, then you have a 98% chance of winning!!!


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Edited by Falcon91Wolvrn03 (02/05/20 06:47 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: PatrickKn] * 2
    #26470900 -

PatrickKn said:
I've never even heard of Buttigieg until this week. Granted, I haven't been watching the debates or anything (because you know, this kind of stuff). Just par for the course I guess. I am a bit surprised some nobody got a bunch of votes with almost no real public following beyond the politically focused.

Well I said I wouldn't vote for Biden if he won the nomination because he's a cunt. If Buttigieg is some robot they sent in to clean up the place in Biden's wake I probably wont for him either.

If Sanders wins, I'll vote for a democrat for the first time ever. Not that I've voted for any republicans either. These shenanigans are the reason why I don't vote for the robots, always third party.

Obama was a corporate bot too.


Heck yeah dude!

:toast:

Just for clarification, Buttigieg only did well in Iowa, because he spent almost all of his money there, campaigning. He was also, clearly colluding with the DNC, and the company that made the voting app. This was all set up to happen this way.

The Democratic party can eat a big fat bag of Joe Rogan's elk dick especial, as far as I'm concerned.


--------------------
"It is no measure of good health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society," - Jiddu Krishnamurti
FARTS
"No my dog won't bite you, tho it had the right to. You ought to give him credit, cuz he knows I woulda let him" - Modest Mouse (And Wooof!)
Every one of you should see this video.
"Facts are chiels that winna ding, and downa be disputed" - Robert Burns


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26470907 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Bigbadwooof said:
Can I put - Koods at the end of the quote?


Sure, I think that's very appropriate given koods is the one always defending the NY Times.

(but it's probably a question for a mod to answer)


A gentleman's bet. I accept.

Not because I think the NYT has journalistic integrity, no, much to the contrary, I think there's a small chance that the DNC is going to rig this shit, and I want you to speak my truth, in your signature.


--------------------
"It is no measure of good health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society," - Jiddu Krishnamurti
FARTS
"No my dog won't bite you, tho it had the right to. You ought to give him credit, cuz he knows I woulda let him" - Modest Mouse (And Wooof!)
Every one of you should see this video.
"Facts are chiels that winna ding, and downa be disputed" - Robert Burns


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: Bigbadwooof] * 2
    #26471014 -

Biden massively scaling back spending in SC.

Warren canceling flights to NV and SC and scaling back spending in both locations.


Warren needs to drop out. Her remaining in this race as an unviable candidate only helps the Bidens and Petes she claims to be running against.





In Iowa Shitshow news: NYT now forecasting Bernie Sanders at about a 75% chance of winning the Iowa Caucus. Who would have thought....


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26471019 -

The Ecstatic said:
In Iowa Shitshow news: NYT now forecasting Bernie Sanders at about a 75% chance of winning the Iowa Caucus. Who would have thought....


What implications does this have for our bet, Falcon? The NYT is now forecasting Bernie as the victor...


--------------------
"It is no measure of good health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society," - Jiddu Krishnamurti
FARTS
"No my dog won't bite you, tho it had the right to. You ought to give him credit, cuz he knows I woulda let him" - Modest Mouse (And Wooof!)
Every one of you should see this video.
"Facts are chiels that winna ding, and downa be disputed" - Robert Burns


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: Bigbadwooof]
    #26471072 -

what bet


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26471079 -

This one


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26471084 -

The Ecstatic said:
In Iowa Shitshow news: NYT now forecasting Bernie Sanders at about a 75% chance of winning the Iowa Caucus. Who would have thought....


Link?  Their election needle gives Buttigieg a 98.5% chance of winning, and shows Bernie as "Barely possible".


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26471090 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
The Ecstatic said:
In Iowa Shitshow news: NYT now forecasting Bernie Sanders at about a 75% chance of winning the Iowa Caucus. Who would have thought....


Link?  Their election needle gives Buttigieg a 98.5% chance of winning, and shows Bernie as "Barely possible".


Yes, please provide a link to my preferred news source's news that Bernie Sanders is the likely winner, so I can win my bet with Falcon, that the NYT is accurate.


--------------------
"It is no measure of good health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society," - Jiddu Krishnamurti
FARTS
"No my dog won't bite you, tho it had the right to. You ought to give him credit, cuz he knows I woulda let him" - Modest Mouse (And Wooof!)
Every one of you should see this video.
"Facts are chiels that winna ding, and downa be disputed" - Robert Burns


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: Bigbadwooof] * 1
    #26471101 -

https://twitter.com/LuluFriesdat/status/1225256764649680898

Quote:
We found #RoundingErrors in 30% of the precinct math worksheets that we examined from the #IowaCaucus. Each "rounding error" gave one extra delegate to a candidate, over 50% of the time the extra delegate went to @PeteButtigieg
.




--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: Bigbadwooof] * 3
    #26471102 -

Sanders is going to win the nomination.  Butt Egg...no.  Everyone should send forks to Biden because he is done.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: sh4d0ws]
    #26471104 -



--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: sh4d0ws] * 1
    #26471105 -





Bernie is so unlucky, weird how all the mistakes and rounding errors occurred to every candidate but him

:philososloth:



there is more

:facepalm:



Edited by sh4d0ws (02/05/20 09:11 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: qman]
    #26471139 -

qman said:
Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Welp, looks like it's over.  The New York Times needle gives Buttigieg a 98% chance of winning:



So anyone here that thinks the New York Times is an honest paper should make a signature bet with me now about the final winner.  I'm picking the 50:1 underdog, Bernie Sanders, but I'm willing to give you even odds.

Loser's signature has to be visible for 3 months and say "I am stupid for thinking (winner's name) was wrong about the New York Times being an establishment (mainstream) paper.  I now clearly see that it is.

Any takers?  Anyone who told me I was wrong about the NY Times should take an offer with such good odds.


I was told that the NYT's was the pinnacle of professional journalism. :cookiemonster:

Feldman, what's going on?????


Fuck, missed all the fun:sad:

I’ll obv take the bet if the offer’s still good

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: feldman114]
    #26471158 -

hmm it appears maybe some of those rounding errors are not actually errors at all and that is the way your whacky election process hands out extra delegates

pretty sure sanders is still gonnna win this but the media is still reporting pete :shrug:


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: feldman114]
    #26471186 -

feldman114 said:
Fuck, missed all the fun:sad:

I’ll obv take the bet if the offer’s still good


You're fuckin up, bro.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: sh4d0ws]
    #26471187 -

Caucuses are confusing as fuck...but a 1.5% lead at 95% of ballots pretty much guarantees a win for Pete, unfortunately. Over 90% of the remaining ballots need to go to Bernie for him to win.

Unless the current numbers are plain lies...though if the establishment was rigging an election, wouldn’t Biden be winning?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: Bigbadwooof] * 1
    #26471195 -

Bigbadwooof said:
feldman114 said:
Fuck, missed all the fun:sad:

I’ll obv take the bet if the offer’s still good


You're fuckin up, bro.


Maybe. Gotta stand by my previous poasts though. Otherwise I’m no better than a republican senator lol.

Also, wtf. Like, how does that make any sense??? Bernie’s final count is higher but Pete still has more delegates?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders - Woooflestiltskin 2020 [Re: feldman114]
    #26471223 -

feldman114 said:
Bigbadwooof said:
feldman114 said:
Fuck, missed all the fun:sad:

I’ll obv take the bet if the offer’s still good


You're fuckin up, bro.


Maybe. Gotta stand by my previous poasts though. Otherwise I’m no better than a republican senator lol.



Republican president, even.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | | Last >

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Poll: 20% of White Democrats Vote McCain If Obama Is The Nominee lonestar2004 1,561 16 03/01/08 01:49 AM
by KillerPicklez
* Super Tuesday: Democrats outpolled Reps by 6 million. blackegg 1,348 13 02/29/08 02:04 AM
by fireworks_god
* TRUMP 2024
( 1 2 3 4 ... 2064 2065 )		 XUL 473,398 41,292 08/23/26 02:01 PM
by durian_2008
* Notice To Incumbent Democrats Up For Reelection In 2014:
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all )		 starfire_xes 5,305 174 11/22/13 07:32 PM
by zappaisgod
* Are Democrats Creeping Into Contention? lonestar2004 1,675 2 06/22/05 10:24 PM
by Ravus
* Social Engineering by Democrats Destroys the World's Financial Markets
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 Phred 8,317 97 10/17/08 01:18 AM
by riceandpeas
* Senate Democrats say their rookies strayed on FISA discombobulate 515 2 08/09/07 04:37 AM
by Seuss
* Democrats Panick Over Obuma's New Power Plant Regulations
( 1 2 3 all )		 Stonehenge 2,560 56 06/16/14 04:18 PM
by Luddite

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
87,365 topic views. 2 members, 128 guests and 15 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.043 seconds spending 0.012 seconds on 16 queries.