qman said:

A 11 year old boy is still a child, he doesn't need the burden of being some sort of advocate for any type of community. 

Anyone can see this child isn't right in his own head, while it's not technically "abuse" according to the CPS, that doesn't mean it's not child abuse.
...

---

qman said:

...
This child needs a new environment for his own safety and future as an adult. He's NOT going to be able to function if something isn't changed for him very soon. 

He's going to turn 18 at some point and will have every opportunity to do whatever he chooses. For now, he should be allowed to be a 11 year boy which doesn't involved being a drag queen, a performer in front of adults and an advocate for some adult social movement.

What do you think is going to happen when he's old enough to realize he's been exploited by adults his whole childhood?  Yeah, not good.

---

natedawgnow said:

Child pageantry of any kind is disgusting.


Also, in that video the kid is dancing suggestively while people around the
stage hand him money. Tantrika, I usually enjoy your posts but it's pretty
disingenuous to compare that to a talent show when grown men are throwing a ten
year old money for dancing provocatively on stage.

Come on guys

---

natedawgnow said:

This is what I mean about disingenuous debate. Talent shows are not anywhere
near the same thing as pagaents and mock tease dances (which is definitely
whats happening in that video) and I know that you
know this.

The 1st instance of being handed money in the vid is within 30 seconds.
I think it's interesting though that you think watching the video is weird but
somehow hving the kid do it, film it, and have grown men handing him money
while he doesn't isn't any weirder than a talent show. That's some mental gymnastics right there.

---

natedawgnow said:

...
No, the money isn't my main problem. The money just reaffirms the fact that
this isn't just meant to be a kid having innocent fun. He's basically being paid to
do a mock tease show and that's sick. Is this at a bar?
...

---

natedawgnow said:

...
So by acknowledging that this is a trigger for you, you also acknowledge
that what is happening to this kid is possibly traumatizing, just like your
experience. Except that being in swim trunks and dressing in scantily clad
drag while grown men gawk are a little different.

---

qman said:

CPS didn't want to go to war with the LGBTQ movement, it isn't a winnable war. So that's why they retreated from this battle.
...

---

qman said:

...
Is this child being exploited by adults for a variety of different reasons?  Definitely. ...

---

qman said:

...
Does the state want to intervene and get attacked by the SJW's screaming "bigots" and kidnapping conservatives?  Hell no. 
...

---

They should want to, the target family is white and can't be used in an SJW racial discrimination narrative
if CPS does not seek to inhibit the kid from dressing in drag in his new home because its his preference, SJWs would rejoice

why can't the state take little gay and trans muslim kids out of their conservative households and give them to trans-friendly white families like his?
SJWs screaming "bigots" over racism;
SJWs don't want trans kids raised in trans-friendly households, they want white kids raised in coloured households

qman said:

...
At the end of the day, this child is all on his own. His parents are abusing him and CPS is terrified to rescue him because it's too dangerous to do so. I fear for his future, it looks very bleak.

---

Am interested to see how the kid turns out, and think the bleakest part of his scenario is he has had to grow up in a twitter culture where people all over the world feel need to comment about him
how do you think he's going to feel when he hits 18, signs up for the Shroomery and finds out some crazy druggies had opinions on his performances?
some transwoman in the political forum didn't like that he was a boy doing a drag rather than a woman finding self-expression through performance culture
because transvestites have a hand in the aversive public reception of my use of the word "tranny"


Maybe he'll end up a drugged out performer like some sort of Marilyn Manson figure
and end up loving all the criticism he got over his games of dress-up

koods said:

and what does that have to do with leftists?

---

Quote:

Brazilian mother 'stabs her 17-year-old son to death because he was gay after two thugs she hired refused to kill him'

    Tatiana Lozano Pereira, 32, admitted to killing her son Itaberli Lozano, 17
    According to local reports, Pereira had long rejected her son as he was gay
    After an explosive row, she allegedly hired two hitmen to kill her son
    However when they failed to do so, she stabbed him to death with a knife

---

Quote:

At the police station, they confirmed the crime without showing regret. According to investigations, they are from Acre and have been in Brasilia for two years. In the house where they lived, biblical passages marked the walls, as well as moldy pans on a stove. Both described the crime to the police without fear and said they planned the act a month ago.

---

Quote:

The motivation for the crime, according to Rosana, was because the boy very much remembered her father, the child's grandfather. Her goal was to start a new life with Kacyla, and for that she would have to kill the boy.

---

Quote:

Rhuan's father reveals that the boy was diagnosed with autism and therefore needed special follow-up to attend college. When she finally got the medical referral to request special care for her son, Rosana disappeared from the map with him. Rhuan would begin his studies in 2015, but a year earlier his mother took him and no longer allowed his father and son to see each other.

After the arrest, Rosana stated that the boy's death was "necessary" to forget a time of abuse and aggression from the boy's father. " Before she left here, she had denounced me for assault, but she has never been to any audience, " she says. The position of the boy's maternal grandmother was clear in the court case for custody of the child. " Her mother helped me, she knows who I am, I've never done anything bad to her, " the man adds.

The separation of the couple brought an unusual situation. With nowhere to go, Rosana stayed with Rhuan in the house of the boy's paternal grandparents. Meanwhile, Douglas had to leave the parents' house, returning only for a visit. " I came every day to see him, to walk with him, " comments Douglas, who returned to live with his parents. She swore that the man would never see her son again.

Apparent normality

Despite his history of confusion with Rhuan's mother, Douglas admits that Rosana behaved like a "normal person." At least until he entered the evangelical church, where he met Kacyla. After joining his companion, accomplice in the murder of his son, " it has changed; has completely gone mad . " He recalls that even the boy's clothes were the target of Rosana's religious fanaticism. " She set fire to Rhuan's clothes, because there were some drawings of a child, which she considered 'the devil '," Douglas says, his voice lanky.

But Rosana's impetus was not limited to the relation with the son - dead, burned and quartered by her. When Rosana's own mother took Douglas's party in the custody of the boy, " she threatened to set fire to her mother's house too; very sinister, "recalls Maicon.

Despite acknowledging the boy's mother's imbalance, he questions Kacyla's attitude after his arrest. " She was always the mentor and Rosana complied. Kacyla tries to get her off the line, (in) all the interviews she blames only on Rosana, "he criticizes. " I had no clue (of this behavior). There was no such madness, it was only bursting when she met Kacyla . "

In addition to the post-mortem dismemberment, the investigations indicate that the couple would have cut the boy's penis a few months ago. Asked if he believes in the hypotheses raised by the Federal District Civil Police (PCDF), Douglas does not hesitate. "Surely the wickedness in their heads leads me to believe. It was not a belief, it was a sect, something very crazy. "

---

MagicMush123 said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/verdict-jury-awards-gibsons-bakery-11-million-against-oberlin-college/amp/

The verdict sends a strong message that colleges and universities cannot simply wind up and set loose student social justice warriors and then wash their hands of the consequences. In this case, a wholly innocent 5th-generation bakery was falsely accused of being racist and having a history racial profiling after stopping three black Oberlin College students from shoplifting. The students eventually pleaded guilty, but not before large protests and boycotts intended to destroy the bakery and defame the owners. The jury appears to have accepted that Oberlin College facilitated the wrongful conduct against the bakery.

---

koods said:

and what does that have to do with leftists?

---