twighead said:

Was this dude posted yet?

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nathan-larson-congressional-candidate-pedophile_us_5b10916de4b0d5e89e1e4824

"Congressional Candidate Admits He's a Pedophile"

According to Larson’s campaign manifesto, his platform as a “quasi-neoreactionary libertarian” candidate includes protecting gun ownership rights, establishing free trade and protecting “benevolent white supremacy,” as well as legalizing incestuous marriage and child pornography.

"When asked whether he’s a pedophile or just writes about pedophilia, he said, “It’s a mix of both. When people go over the top there’s a grain of truth to what they say.”
Asked whether there was a “grain of truth” in his essay about father-daughter incest and another about raping his ex-wife repeatedly, he said yes, offering that plenty of women have rape fantasies."

---

Bubbles85 said:

Would vote for this dude in a fucking heart beat.

A National Socialist America would be unstoppable. I have no doubt however that the Jews are prepared for the European push back and such an eventuality. They have such influence thought out the entire world that stopping them won't be easy.

But world Jewry must be smashed if the world is to ever have peace.

---

DC Police witness William Chatman for the J20 trials, who was combative with defense & insisted on calling protesters “rioters”, wore a pro-police brutality shirt around court for hours after testifying.




Also, for those following along at home: last week it was revealed that prosecutors had illegally withheld evidence from the Trump inauguration protesters. Turns out that the Project Veritas undercover video - a central piece of evidence in support of the conspiracy charges - had edited out portions that exculpated the defence, and the prosecution had decided to not provide this information to the defence.

Quote:

“This is exculpatory evidence to the defense. The government plans to argue that Mr. Petrohilos and everyone else at that meeting were intending to plan a violent protest. What better exculpatory evidence for the Defense than the words from the person sent to capture a nefarious meeting stating right after the meeting, “I don’t think they know anything”. This evidence is clearly exculpatory and but for the Court compelling its production, Defense would have never received it.” – Motion for Sanctions and Dismissal

---