Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Update
    #25979799 -

This is my opinion and maybe others as well. I honestly think we need to update the TEK section. Maybe make a place for the outdated Teks and a place for the modern ones and maybe make a place for the experiment ones. It's confusing to new people. I haven't been here long and have seen people using outdated methods and such.
I know this is likely easier said than done. But I feel this could possibly make it easier on the new people and easy on the people giving advice and feedback. Just a thought nothing more.


--------------------



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Update [Re: CypressRage] * 2
    #25980001 -

If you can't find the new good stuff you're doomed. I don't even get how people dig up the old stuff anymore. If you miss the sticky posts that's on you. and if you so happen to miss the forums find the main site if you miss the fact that the location of the tek you found is located in the archive that's on you, and furthermore most of the old stuff in the main site tells you to go to the forums.

No matter how in the face we put good info someone will dig up old shit. So are we to delete old stuff and censor history? I don't think so

We have a high proportion of people who their first post is a grow and a nice one. The info is there in super easily accessible spots. But not everyone is capable at the same level. We step in to help those people who missed that day in 4th grade they teach you how to use a search engine and vet sources.

Ive spent a lot of time thinking about this problem trying to make it better but after this much effort you're kind of left wondering if the people digging up such bad info should be growing drugs in the first place. Which sounds harsh but try fixing the issue for 4+ years and having it seem like nothing improved

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Update [Re: bodhisatta]
    #25980117 -

I never thought about it that way. You make some really good points and I agree 100% with them. I guess I'm OCD and everything is disorganized to me. But I managed to learn from this site and continue to learn.


--------------------



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Member Poll: Help Us Improve the Shroomery!
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
YthanA 11,872 81 07/26/04 05:00 PM
by ChromeCrow
* Board improvements 3DSHROOM 1,702 13 11/17/02 01:52 PM
by 3DSHROOM
* Experiments Forum RebelSteve33 1,489 1 05/30/02 10:48 AM
by mycofile
* picture uploading util is updated matts 3,628 16 02/17/03 07:11 PM
by Anno
* Flawed Experiment
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
afoaf 26,520 150 11/23/03 08:47 AM
by Anonymous
* This OTD "experiment" could backfire... Lightningfractal 2,965 19 03/13/06 05:49 AM
by Anno
* Re: Trip report updates BrAiN 1,810 4 10/17/98 04:41 PM
by Anonymous
* matts 2,863 19 06/10/03 07:06 PM
by blaze2

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Ythan, Thor, Seuss, geokills
278 topic views. 0 members, 71 guests and 2 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.025 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 16 queries.