|
Anonymous
|
|
The "star wars" systems are not armour!!! The systems under consideration are either small missiles or laser that are fired at incoming missiles. The fact that it can be fired means its a weapon.
if its a 'first strike weapon', what are the small missiles and lasers firing at?
Edited by mushmaster (04/12/03 04:20 PM)
|
Anonymous
|
|
ah, annapurna. you are a man of contradictions. (can i say that?) 
you condemn the government of the US for pre-emtively attacking the government of iraq.
you criticize america's government for trying to develop a sheild from missile attacks, saying that again, this constitutes an aggressive act by the US.
and then you say, in that very same thread, that a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the united states by russia is a good idea, and that if you were president of russia, that's what you'd do.
i'm sure glad that of all the nations in possession of nukes, none of them are run by you.
Condemning america's pre-emptive attack against iraq's government.
then advocating that russia start nuclear war as part of a 'pre-emptive attack'?
and a SHEILD as an aggressive weapon?
|
Anonymous
|
|
"Shrub has attempted to antagonize the Russians at more than one point during the war. And unlike Saddam Hussein, the Russians have real bombs. Does the Shrub know that, or was he just snorting whiskey and drinking cocaine again?? Anyway, it might be better for America and world if we did get nuked..."
"[If EMP weapons existed] Shrub would have already launched a massive preemptive strike against the Russians (or at least issued an ultimatum). OTOH, if the Russians believed that we were on the brink of acquiring a true anti-missile defense (of whatever kind), then they would launch a preemptive strike against Amerikkka (sic) before it could be implemented (unless their as stupid as they appear to be)."
"If comitting suicide means stopping the Shrub, then its definitely the proper goal. The Russians face the same choice as someone who knows they will be killed anyway, but can opt to bring about their killers' death in the process."
NUKE AMERICA!!!! NUKE AMERICA!!!! DOWN WITH THE EVIL CAPITALIST EMPIRE!!!!
come on anna, we'll go make some signs we can chant it in the street.
|
 Psilocybeingzz
 
Registered: 12/15/02
Posts: 14,463
Loc: International waters
Last seen: 10 years, 6 months
|
 Re: Syria or Iran?  [Re: ]
#1453145 - 04/12/03 05:15 PM (20 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
America has not right to
"change" the world they put most of the worlds most horrible leaders in power and "liberation"
is just to make thing easy for them (if you are the richest nation in the world you want and the markets open and cartering to your need ,excuse me .....(pucking sound )
anyway
is the US want to spread democracy around the world they could start byu not selling the most weapons in the world including torture weapons and those are used to
"keep people down"
america has a serious image problem and image that to some extent reflects reality quite well
|
Anonymous
|
|
when a nation surrenders in a war, and then for the next 13 years is in constant violation of the conditional surrender agreement it signed, it gets attacked.
is the US want to spread democracy around the world they could start byu not selling the most weapons in the world including torture weapons and those are used to
some people want to buy weapons. this means someone's going to make them for them. they'll buy the best weapons they can at the cheapest price they can afford. america builds good weapons, and sells them competitively.
or we could stop selling weapons and just let people buy arms from germany instead.
it's called capitalism, and it's DIRTY and EVIL.
weapons are not the reason people have been killing and warring all these years.
we should not be selling devices of torture. this should be illegal. we cannot ban selling weapons. we should not sell weapons to oppressive regimes, and try to prevent others from doing so when possible.
|
 Annapurna1
liberal pussy
Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,646
Loc: innsmouth..MA
|
Re: Syria or Iran? [Re: ]
#1453271 - 04/12/03 06:12 PM (20 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ah, annapurna. you are a man of contradictions. (can i say that?)
How many guys named "Anna" do you know??
--------------------
"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...
|
mntlfngrs
The Art of Casterbation
Registered: 07/18/02
Posts: 3,937
Last seen: 4 years, 9 months
|
|
That must be you in your avatar?
--------------------
Be all and you'll be to end all
|
PsiloKitten
Ganja Goddess
Registered: 02/12/99
Posts: 1,617
|
|
Quote:
Anyway, I personally vote Syria... but Ive been giving some thought to Palestine lately. Its really hot for syria right now, in more ways then one... so we may not see it until fall. Its just really hard to say, because it would be smart for them to go right on in, plus we arent really fighting any groundwar, so the heat isnt that big of an issue and we are there anyway. Not to mention the fact that they just sent the moab over to the persian gulf. It all really depends on what the motives of this administration truly are. I know Israel is gunning for Hezbollah and there is a pretty interesting Israel/ 9-11 link.
So you want a war? Ill show you a war.
Oh hell, I didnt know Hizbollah had offices in syria  One two punch.
Onward Christian Soldiers!
--------------------
|
wingnutx
Registered: 09/24/00
Posts: 2,283
|
|
Quote:
the syrians will teach them a lesson
Heh, right. Syria couldn't even beat tiny Israel, much less the US or UK. Individually, Arab soldiers are fine. As armies, though, they are spectacularly ineffective.
Syria can continue to beat up on Lebanon, but that's about the limits of their capabilities.
|
JohnnyRespect
Nomadic Wanderer
Registered: 04/16/03
Posts: 676
Loc: East Coast
Last seen: 19 years, 11 months
|
Re: Syria or Iran? [Re: ]
#1471712 - 04/18/03 09:27 PM (20 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Syria OR Iran? Heh, I think we should start in Iraq, work east until we reach Israel, South till the Arabian sea, West to India, and North to Georgia. Take their oil, take their terror funding money. I don't think that trading camels gives enough pocket cash to train 20 people to fly airplanes. (note, thats from those terror attacks on 9/11 that most people now seem to have conviently forgotten)
Pz
Johnny R
--------------------
As I felt the soft cool mud squish between my toes, I thought, Man, these are not very good shoes!
|
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order
Edit 
Reply 
EchoVortex
1 2 all )
