Home | Community | Message Board

MushroomMan Mycology
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Myyco.com Shop: Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
did prop19 backfire?...
    #13567975 -

there was some speculation at the beginning of the 2010 campaign season that prop19 would drive more liberals to the polls in CA...

that didnt happen...the liberals did win in CA..but it wasnt because of prop19...in fact..prop19 might have driven conservatives to the polls in other states.. and the resulting repug win is almost certain to lead to an escalation of prohibition...

so in your opinion..did prop19 stir up the dreaded "silent majority" outside CA?...thx...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Annapurna1]
    #13568012 -

> and the resulting repug win is almost certain to lead to an escalation of prohibition...

Anybody with half a brain can see that your precious liberals support prohibition just as much, if not more, than your scary "repugs".  Look at their voting record.  Look at the number of people tossed in prison during various presidents administration for non-violent drug related offenses (notice the huge jump during Clinton's reign?)  Look at how quickly Obama has moved to stop people from being imprisoned for using cocaine, the same illegal drug that he used to use.

> did prop19 stir up the dreaded "silent majority" outside CA?...thx...

No.  I don't think that drug users are nearly as partisan as you do.

Edit:

By half a brain, I'm not speaking towards intelligence, but rather towards a blindness of partisanship.  Probably a poor choice of words.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Seuss]
    #13569009 -

Seuss said:
Look at how quickly Obama has moved to stop people from being imprisoned for using cocaine, the same illegal drug that he used to use.




look how quickly he stepped up for marijuana and and tobacco users, some
other drugs he smoked. I guess we know what he really loves smoking
because of his handling of gays in the military

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Annapurna1]
    #13569027 -

Annapurna1 said:
there was some speculation at the beginning of the 2010 campaign season that prop19 would drive more liberals to the polls in CA...

that didnt happen...the liberals did win in CA..but it wasnt because of prop19...in fact..prop19 might have driven conservatives to the polls in other states.. and the resulting repug win is almost certain to lead to an escalation of prohibition...

so in your opinion..did prop19 stir up the dreaded "silent majority" outside CA?...thx...



California has been in Democratic hands for quite some time. Doesn't seem to have helped them much.

Which leaves me with 2 questions:

1. Are you Jimbotron?
2. Have you ever had a non-partisan thought?


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #13569444 -

> 1. Are you Jimbotron?

Jimbotron has actually had a non-partisan post or three, so I doubt this is the case.

> 2. Have you ever had a non-partisan thought?

Not that I have ever seen... other than to blame "Obumble" for not being progressive enough.


--------------------
Just another spore in the wind.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Seuss]
    #13570829 -

Seuss said:
> and the resulting repug win is almost certain to lead to an escalation of prohibition...

Anybody with half a brain can see that your precious liberals support prohibition just as much, if not more, than your scary "repugs".  Look at their voting record.  Look at the number of people tossed in prison during various presidents administration for non-violent drug related offenses (notice the huge jump during Clinton's reign?)  Look at how quickly Obama has moved to stop people from being imprisoned for using cocaine, the same illegal drug that he used to use.



bill clinton was about as liberal as atilla the hun...so are many other candidates liberals vote for...liberals can only vote for the more liberal candidate.. but being more liberal than someone else doesnt make you a liberal...

Quote:
> did prop19 stir up the dreaded "silent majority" outside CA?...thx...

No.  I don't think that drug users are nearly as partisan as you do.




drug prohibitionists are definitely hyper-partisan.. despite congressional democrats' apparent support for the drug war..which i still think is because they too fear a backlash from the silent majority if they dont go along...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Annapurna1] * 1
    #13571702 -

> drug prohibitionists are definitely hyper-partisan.. despite congressional democrats' apparent support for the drug war.

You left out presidents and judges as well.  I don't know what fantasy world you are living in, but prohibition crosses partisan lines, even if you do not.  Carter was the only high ranking Democrat that I can think of that has been anti-prohibition, and look how well he did with it.


--------------------
Just another spore in the wind.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Seuss]
    #13571939 -

Seuss said:
> 1. Are you Jimbotron?

Jimbotron has actually had a non-partisan post or three, so I doubt this is the case.



Pics or it didn't happen.



Quote:
> 2. Have you ever had a non-partisan thought?

Not that I have ever seen... other than to blame "Obumble" for not being progressive enough.



I guess you got me on that one.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Seuss]
    #13573258 -

carters' example actually backs the "silent majority" theory (more below)...

judges are bound by mandatory sentencing laws.. while presidents are under the same political pressure as MCs ..namely that the repugs hold all the trump cards...

no democratic politician would ever call prohibition into serious question.. but they generally keep silent until a repug congressional majority and/or a repug POTUS decides to escalate..after which they will either rubber stamp the escalation or make it even worse...prolly because their not sure if carter was beaten by a bad or economy or a prohibitionist silent majority...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Annapurna1]
    #13573552 -

Annapurna1 said:
carters' example actually backs the "silent majority" theory (more below)...

judges are bound by mandatory sentencing laws.. while presidents are under the same political pressure as MCs ..namely that the repugs hold all the trump cards...

no democratic politician would ever call prohibition into serious question.. but they generally keep silent until a repug congressional majority and/or a repug POTUS decides to escalate..after which they will either rubber stamp the escalation or make it even worse...prolly because their not sure if carter was beaten by a bad or economy or a prohibitionist silent majority...



Or... because politicians from both sides are equally pathetic. Just in different ways.

And nobody gives a fuck (or a second thought) to Carter. He was a pimple on the ass of history.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Annapurna1]
    #13573876 -

> carters' example actually backs the "silent majority" theory

So even though Democrats had a large enough majority to pass healthcare against Republican wishes, they are still impotent when it comes to revoking prohibition, something they are all supposedly against?  I call bullshit.  You are wearing partisan glasses and refuse to acknowledge that the Democrats are just as corrupt as the Republicans when it comes to prohibition.


--------------------
Just another spore in the wind.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Seuss]
    #13574171 -

and i call apples and oranges...

Edited by Annapurna1 (12/02/10 04:23 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Annapurna1]
    #13574447 -

seven


--------------------
Just another spore in the wind.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Seuss]
    #13574486 -

Seuss said:
seven



Magenta


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #13574853 -

Magenta?  Better be careful, or I'm gonna vote for Zappa.


--------------------
Just another spore in the wind.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: did prop19 backfire?... [Re: Seuss]
    #13575005 -

Seuss said:
Magenta?  Better be careful, or I'm gonna vote for Zappa.



LOL. Who ever said there'd be a vote?


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Myyco.com Shop: Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* do the repugs still control congress??... Annapurna1 432 12 04/15/09 04:29 AM
by Seuss
* Obama's Cabinet Of Corruption (Do Democrats EVER Pay Taxes?)
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all )
lonestar2004 11,958 179 03/31/09 08:55 PM
by TGRR
* bob bennett loses primary.. "too liberal" for UT repugs... Annapurna1 1,079 9 05/10/10 03:24 PM
by zappaisgod
* Are Democrats Creeping Into Contention? lonestar2004 1,678 2 06/22/05 10:24 PM
by Ravus
* --- EntheogenicPeace 1,840 13 07/20/13 03:24 PM
by Stonehenge
* MD gov calls repugs out on their crap... Annapurna1 423 4 07/20/11 03:49 PM
by GI_Luvmoney
* Democrats and Republicans both adept at ignoring facts, brain scans show HagbardCeline 725 3 01/26/06 10:29 AM
by Silversoul
* rasmussen polls show no toxic environment for repugs... Annapurna1 2,088 15 06/03/08 09:41 AM
by afoaf

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
852 topic views. 1 members, 223 guests and 106 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.023 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 14 queries.