Auto-SummaryThis engaging forum discussion explores the compatibility of religion and science. The main argument revolves around the idea that religion and science cannot coexist within a single mind due to their fundamental differences: religion being all-knowing dogma and science based on human knowledge and study. The author challenges the notion that one must choose between strict adherence to the Bible and embracing scientific understanding, suggesting that a more nuanced perspective allows for the integration of both. Key points include the interpretation of the Bible's ancient context, the potential for a God who doesn't create the universe in a static, unchanging manner, and the belief that the Bible's infallibility requires acceptance of all its teachings. The post concludes by emphasizing that a flawed Christianity, shaped by human imperfection, doesn't necessitate the Bible being all or nothing.
psilyguy said:
DragonChaser said:
doom876 said: Well, they do conflict unless you cherry-pick what you believe in the bible, which in that case you are probably dumber then the hard core christian. (you're even dumber for not being able to see that certain things, like the coexistence of religion and science might be out of your limited mind's grasp) It's all or nothing (once again, a stupid belief, as very little about life is all or nothing), and I choose to believe the bible is BS.
Religion and science cannot co-exist in one mind (maybe your mind is just too small for both to fit inside it) because one is all knowing dogma and one is based on the knowledge that people gather through study!
You know what is more annoying then creationists, people who think that god created the big bang so they don't have to compromise! (wouldn't that be the simplest and most beautiful way he could create the universe? with an explosion of matter directly from him, and letting the universe and life evolve on its own? do you really expect everyone who believes in God to believe that he sat down like a potter with a wheel and formed every living creature, every planet, every single thing by hand?)
I question your knowledge of religion. Religion isn't about following a book, word for word. Its about having a personal relationship with your God. The book serves a purpose if you feel lost, or need guidance.
The Bible was written by ancient man. Lets say that they were revealed the creation of the universe in visions from God. How would they describe it? They lacked knowledge of physics, chemistry, etc, so they would describe it in things they were familiar with. They may describe the stages of the universes formation as "days", and seeing stars coalesce from gaseous matter would appear to them as God separating darkness from light. Seeing the earth form would be the separation of the heavens and the earth. The bible never says that God made man in his physical image, just "in our image", as in the image of he and the host of angels, and other creatures of spirit. I've wondered if it just meant that man was the only creature bestowed a soul component, and thats what finally separated us from other primates.
There is a lot of room for interpretation in the bible than you might think. You have to realize that it was written from ancient man's perspective, and try to look at it appropriately.
People have it in their heads that the idea behind creationism is that God created the universe and every living thing exactly the way it is, never changing. How boring is that? Would an all powerful being really do something so... simple, and boring?
Or would it all start with an unimaginable bang, followed by countless of unbelievably complex and beautiful processes over billions of years, matter coalescing into planets and stars, and in some areas, lifeless matter somehow becoming amino acids, and then simple life, finally culminating (in one small part of our galaxy) in a small green and blue planet with an amazingly complex system of life living on it.
Which one is more worthy of a God?
very well stated. not only was the bible written from the perspective of ancient man, but also modern man has taken the bible and taken things out, put things in, and change things in it already. anyone who thinks its all or nothing just makes me 
You didn't read my other posts, and as a "prophetic" work, you can't cherry pick it without tossing it like you could dissect something based off reason without saying "well, these ancient people had it all wrong, might as well toss this shit and start over".
Quote: I know, but most atheists wouldn't either, because they view religion and the bible as an all-or-nothing experience.
But that stance is based on the assumption that if there is indeed a God, that hardcore Christians are right. Get it?
Only when you start with the assumption that "If there is a God, Christianity must be right" can you come to the assumption that "the Bible is all or nothing".
If you start with the assumption that "there is a God, but Christianity is flawed (which it must be, since its a creation of man, and man is flawed, an imperfect being can never learn how to worship a perfect being)", then the Bible and hardcore Christians cannot be 100% accurate.
Therefore the bible is not all or nothing, and neither is religion.
Not really, I'm just saying by the bible's own teaching it is infallible, so to believe in it in any significant way besides as vague a moral outline(against killing, robbery, etc.), then you have to believe it all.
I'm not saying hard core Christians are right. I hate Christians, their beliefs show how ignorant and sheep like they are. I tried to respect it, but it eats itself. They may especially be wrong, because Jesus set up new teachings, and they contradict the Old Testimant by preaching love rather then "stone the gays". The people like those from that one famous Baptist church that I can't remember the name of pretty much ignore Jesus.
--------------------
Fight for a large loving government that can take care of its people, kill our criminals, and preform the huge industrial tasks our corporate overlords refuse(wanna greenwash me some more Exon?)
Not this weak travesty that let millions starve and sucks corporate cock while failing at every turn.
Edited by doom876 (03/21/09 04:25 PM)
|