lowbrow said:

nah.

---

Quote:

Cool story. It would take you 5 minutes to double check that. Not doing so is dumb as shit.

---

lowbrow said:

But he doesnt take a salary.  You appear to be in error

---

no he just takes everything else while people like you carry his water saying "but he doesnt take a salary."

gg trying to troll people that see you coming

lowbrow said:

dinosaurs said:

lowbrow said:

Why would somebody who doesnt even take a salary try to use the office to make money, not only is that illegal but it just doesnt line up with the psychology of such an individual, they would happily take the 400,000 on top of anything else.

---

are you stupid or something?  trumps own financial disclosures show that he "made" $2.2 billion dollars in 2025 and he conducted more stock trades than all of congress combined, many under very suspicious circumstances such as a purchase just before said company is awarded a govt contract, or he pumps their stock in a tweet.

this shit is just beyond debate yet here you are trying to explain how the guy that is stealing from you is doing you a favor.

https://political.org/2026/08/05/eric-liptons-pulitzer-prize-winning-investigation-reveals-trump-made-an-estimated-2-2-billion-in-first-year-of-second-term/

use your fucking head.

---

Is he doing something illegal?

---

yes.  again, use your fucking head.

Quote:

AlChemicalResearch said: And thirdly, when I say "weapons-grade uranium", that just means it is the typo of uranium that has the ratio needed to make it possible to turn into "weapons grade uranium". Not all uranium has the ratio of isotopes needed to turn into uranium needed for nuclear weapons. So, ok, the uranium rock that was exported wasn't yet "weapons grade uranium" but it was the type needed to make it.

---

Quote:

Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe, government documents show.

---

gww said:

If your point is, he hasn't been proved guilty on crypto, yes, today.  I know drug dealers that haven't been proved guilty and some that have.  There is always tomorrow.  Got to investigate and gather facts first.  You can bet there will be investigations.  what say you?

---

lowbrow said:

When I say hes working for free its a defacto way of saying hes donating his earnings to charity, in essence, hes working for free.

Now lets get this straight, Trump is working for free, and he’s legally selling crypto.  Wheres the problem

---

Holybullshit said:

Quote:

Hillary Clinton did not sell weapons-grade uranium to Russia. This claim is false and mischaracterizes a 2010 commercial business acquisition known as the Uranium One deal.

The facts surrounding this transaction show that:

It was not weapons-grade uranium: The transaction involved commercial, un-enriched uranium mined from the ground. This material is used as fuel for commercial nuclear power plants, not for manufacturing nuclear weapons.

Clinton did not sell or personally approve it: In 2010, the Russian state-owned corporation Rosatom purchased a majority stake in Uranium One, a Canadian mining company with assets in the United States. Because uranium is a strategic asset, the deal required a unanimous vote by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). This committee consists of nine cabinet-level federal agencies, including the State Department. Clinton was the Secretary of State at the time, but multiple investigations showed she was not personally involved in the review and did not have the authority to single-handedly approve or veto the sale. The final sign-off rested with the President.

No uranium was exported to Russia: The purchase gave Russia ownership over roughly 20% of America's domestic uranium production capacity, meaning the physical mines located inside the United States. However, Uranium One did not possess an export license to ship this uranium out of the country. The material remained in the U.S. for domestic commercial use.

The Clinton Foundation connection: Critics have highlighted that several individuals connected to Uranium One made millions of dollars in donations to the Clinton Foundation. However, fact-checking organizations and independent reviews found that the vast majority of those donations came from a single investor who had sold his entire stake in the company in 2007—three years before the deal took place and before Clinton became Secretary of State. No evidence of a "pay-for-play" arrangement was ever substantiated.

---

Everything you say is bullshit cribbed from right wing propaganda. Even your characterizations of the left and it's opposition to Trump are indicative of someone chronically online fully immersed in the right wing info sphere, loosely tethered to reality.

An intelligent person fed as much bullshit as you would start to question their sources.

Trumps connections to the Russian oligarchy goes back decades. But honestly I don't think he has the first fucking clue what his government is up to most days and that was probably even more true in his first administration where the machinations of government kept working in spite of him. And now he's surrounded himself with a bunch of equally incompetent propagandists and liars desperate to keep him placated so they can pursue their own avenues of corruption and self promotion.

The man is evil, but not because he's an evil genius, but simply because he's an extremely psychologically damaged and stunted greedy narcissistic megalomaniac full of hate and insecurity, he's also a moron, a useful idiot, driven by greed and base instinct, whose been molded by a lifetime of grifting, fraud, gauche showmanship, and the scum he has always surrounded himself with. He's loyal to no one but himself and all of his qualities leave him vulnerable to manipulation.

---

Quote:

Hillary Clinton did not sell weapons-grade uranium to Russia. This claim is false and mischaracterizes a 2010 commercial business acquisition known as the Uranium One deal.

---

You even tried to walk it back by saying raw uranium can be turned into weapons grade uranium.

Do you think anything is unique to trump?


You could say he does similar things to others, but on a larger scale.

And that larger scale is a unique difference.

Weird how you said holys characterisation of trump wasn't wrong, but that the tone was too much? Wtf is that about?

sudly said:

This is just true,

Quote:

Hillary Clinton did not sell weapons-grade uranium to Russia. This claim is false and mischaracterizes a 2010 commercial business acquisition known as the Uranium One deal.

---

You even tried to walk it back by saying raw uranium can be turned into weapons grade uranium.

Do you think anything is unique to trump?


You could say he does similar things to others, but on a larger scale.

And that larger scale is a unique difference.

Weird how you said holys characterisation of trump wasn't wrong, but that the tone was too much? Wtf is that about?

---

AlChemicalResearch said:

sudly said:

This is just true,

Quote:

Hillary Clinton did not sell weapons-grade uranium to Russia. This claim is false and mischaracterizes a 2010 commercial business acquisition known as the Uranium One deal.

---

You even tried to walk it back by saying raw uranium can be turned into weapons grade uranium.

Do you think anything is unique to trump?


You could say he does similar things to others, but on a larger scale.

And that larger scale is a unique difference.

Weird how you said holys characterisation of trump wasn't wrong, but that the tone was too much? Wtf is that about?

---

How is the scale of Trump enriching himself greater than Bush Jr/Cheney?
I think what is unique to Trump is he shitposts. That's it.

---