Anonymous #13 said: Nope. I'm speaking of 'back in the day'.. 1940's there's no reason why it should've been legal for someone over 18 to fuck someone under 14.
Let's call it pre-1900's, is the only period that IMO it's acceptable for an 18+ year old to be sexually engaged with a 13 year old. There's no need or reason for it today, there's no justification for it. Wasn't in 1940, either.. Just because it's legal doesn't make it right.
I love how someone on this site of all places could hold up the law and go "see look they say it's okay! so I can do it!".. If the law knows what's best for you, then you shouldn't be using, selling or manufacturing drugs. Or do you just wanna pick and choose which laws make sense and which don't? Cuz if you do, then refer back to the last line of my 2nd paragraph.
EDIT: And with that I'm done. I know from past experience that if I let it, this will just go back and fourth all day and I don't feel like doing that.
"Or do you just wanna pick and choose which laws make sense and which don't" Yes, that is correct, since I am a free thinking individual, I agree and disagree with certain laws. Are you trying to draw a conclusion that if one agrees with one law, they should agree with ALL laws? If so, you logic fails big-time.
"There's no need or reason for it today, there's no justification for it."
There doesn't have to be a "need", people can do whatever they want at a certain age, regardless of necessity.
Who needs "justification" for it? From who? You and others? A act the involves two legally consenting parties, and does not hurt anyone else, does not need justification.
People doing this act 100 years ago did not need a "justification" and people today don't need it, it a natural human act, get over it.
|