Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ?
    #15436342 -

I am kind of thinking out loud here to see what I think I know and I'm asking you to use your knowledge to help me test mine.

1.) Let's say I make an agar plate from a sample from a single fruitbody (clone).  This should be the result of two mycelia, each genetically half complete, meeting, forming clamp connections and forming a genetically whole mycelium (two that become one) that then was able to fruit.

2.) If I make a plate from spores from the same mushroom from above, many spores may germinate and many pairs of spores may mate (form clamp connections), so I may have some mycelia still half complete and incapable of fruiting and many genetically complete mycelia, some capable of fruiting, some not.

3.) If I grow this culture out on a substrate, some unique mycelia will like the substrate better than others and prosper.  There still may be many unique mycelia growing there. Some half complete mycelia may meet a compatible (contam) partner to form a sexually complete mycelium that now has two separate parents.  This culture may be one of those that prospers.

4.) I fruit the substrate. I expect a poor yield from this process because many unique mycelia have consumed the substrate.

Some of these are half complete mycelia and cannot fruit, and some complete mycelia that are incapable of fruiting, and some are just slower fruiting mycelia, that are not fruiting yet, and some could fruit, but not under the conditions I am supplying.

I have experienced having P. ostreatus and P. eryngii fruiting from the same substrate, so why not five different strains of the same species ?

5.) A clone form a single fruitbody should represent a single genetically complete mycelium, the one that liked the substrate, could cope with all the competition and was the one to fruit soonest given the conditions I provided.  An isolate, Isolate 5, I will call it.

We are back to 1.) above now.

5a.) The next flush from the same substrate may be from an entirely different strain (and probably is), one that fruits later, for example. It could be cloned to agar. Isolate 5a.) doing step 1.) above, again.

6.) Isolate 5, and 5a. having now lived alone for a period of time will have had existing genes turned on or off by it's new experience.  This is described as an epigenetic process of changed acetylation states.

Although each might not have tried to stifle their rival while "growing out" on the original plate and later the substrate, they may (for the first time) do so now if meeting again on an agar plate now.

At my stage of life, I have become accustomed to and have grown to like living alone, without competition, strife or rival. Forcefully rejecting that which I would have formerly tolerated is part of that same curve. If you say that I am conscious and so I can form preferences and make choices, I think you give me too much credit and other creatures not enough.

7.) My understanding of immunity and rejection suggests that an organism recognises molecules as "self" or "not self" and further divides "not self" into harmless and pathogenic.

It may seem unlikely that epigenetic changes would be enough to make two samples of Isolate 5(above) form zones of aversion after being grown apart (for example on different substrates, under different temperatures in different atmospheres etc) but it is by no means impossible. They might consider each other "not self" and form zones of aversion.

A normal "sequence" DNA test would find these samples to be identical, making for a puzzling finding, but more in-depth tests would show that the acetylation (on or off) states of the genes were different between samples.

The lesson could be that no two things are truly the same, but that they only seem to be when we are unable to see them clearly enough.

Conclusion:

This is why I believe that it is of little profit to do aversion studies with mycelia and better to focus on fruit bodies and spores, which are, usefully, available together.

My two cents (more like two dollars) for today,

Jeff


--------------------
I am my own lab rat.


Tell me and I will forget. Show me and I will remember.  Involve me and I will learn.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: Jef]
    #15436478 -

interesting post... but i'm gonna have to read that again..what do u mean by aversion study???

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: Jef]
    #15437243 -

Jef said:
It may seem unlikely that epigenetic changes would be enough to make two samples of Isolate 5(above) form zones of aversion after being grown apart (for example on different substrates, under different temperatures in different atmospheres etc) but it is by no means impossible. They might consider each other "not self" and form zones of aversion.

A normal "sequence" DNA test would find these samples to be identical, making for a puzzling finding, but more in-depth tests would show that the acetylation (on or off) states of the genes were different between samples.


Jeff



Jeff, your thinking is clearly pushing the envelope and it's beyond the realms of my knowledge, but I appreciate you explaining your thought processes, so I can come along for the ride.

What you say, quoted above, seems to be a massive assumption though.  Is there evidence to support this? 

Also, if it's a cloned tissue culture, single strain isolate, why is it assumed that there are half genes forming clamp connections?  That question is not because I doubt you, I just need a little more explanation before I can grasp the concept. 

Cheers,


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: SOUTHERN]
    #15437806 -

Sorry Southern.

This dribble of thoughts originated because of the discussion ongoing here.

And NSF

Quote:
...so I can come along for the ride.



Me, I'm trapped in here.:eek:

Quote:
What you say, quoted above, seems to be a massive assumption though.  Is there evidence to support this?



Specifically about fungus...probably not.  Epigenetics, though a new science, is not junk science.  It explains things like why non-identical looking twins can still be genetically identical.

Quote:
Also, if it's a cloned tissue culture, single strain isolate, why is it assumed that there are half genes forming clamp connections?



Clamp connections are points where two compatible mycelia meet and exchange genetic information. Each mycelium, with half a set of chromosomes, gives the other a copy of its half so that both become identical throughout, now being one organism having a full set. It's like sperm meets egg. Yuck, fungus sex.:drysmash:

Any fruitable "strain" as you call it, should have a complete set, and although now a single being, it used to be two "half  beings" that merged and replicated each other's DNA.  Weird huh?

Two spores become two mycelia, each can grow huge (or not) before meeting, and when they meet, each copies the other's genetic material so many times until all the cells have the same complete code.

Making an extreme example, a single cell of mycelium just arisen from its spore can form a single clamp connection with a ten ton mycelium (that all grew over a long time from another single spore).  The single cell will have to make only one copy of the large partner's DNA and the large partner will copy the single cell's DNA trillions of times until all cells of the mycelium have identical DNA.

We, as cultivators, hope that the strain that results will be fruitable, or we've wasted an awful lot of substrate. :cryariver:  :cryariver:  :cryariver:

I hope this explains it better.

Jef


--------------------
I am my own lab rat.


Tell me and I will forget. Show me and I will remember.  Involve me and I will learn.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: Jef]
    #15438876 -

Yes that sure does explain it better.

But...if, adopting your example, one giant organism has grown from 'half' information, will it still fruit?  Or does it need to meet that second organism and get the other half of the code before it can reproduce?

And then...what's to say after they've met and merged, what happens if a third organism comes along, will it absorb this code and add it?  Is there a limit to how much genetic information one fungus can have? 

Thanks again for explaining all this, despite me now possibly going cross eyed as my brain tries to comprehend.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: Jef]
    #15439081 -

Let me also throw my 2 cents into this can of worms...

Jef said:
I am kind of thinking out loud here to see what I think I know and I'm asking you to use your knowledge to help me test mine.

1.) Let's say I make an agar plate from a sample from a single fruitbody (clone).  This should be the result of two mycelia, each genetically half complete, meeting, forming clamp connections and forming a genetically whole mycelium (two that become one) that then was able to fruit.

2.) If I make a plate from spores from the same mushroom from above, many spores may germinate and many pairs of spores may mate (form clamp connections), so I may have some mycelia still half complete and incapable of fruiting and many genetically complete mycelia, some capable of fruiting, some not.

3.) If I grow this culture out on a substrate, some unique mycelia will like the substrate better than others and prosper.  There still may be many unique mycelia growing there. Some half complete mycelia may meet a compatible (contam) partner to form a sexually complete mycelium that now has two separate parents.  This culture may be one of those that prospers.

4.) I fruit the substrate. I expect a poor yield from this process because many unique mycelia have consumed the substrate.

Some of these are half complete mycelia and cannot fruit, and some complete mycelia that are incapable of fruiting, and some are just slower fruiting mycelia, that are not fruiting yet, and some could fruit, but not under the conditions I am supplying.

I have experienced having P. ostreatus and P. eryngii fruiting from the same substrate, so why not five different strains of the same species ?



The two monokaryotic mycelia from single spores, which fuse through anastomosis, exchange nuclei and then form a dikaryotic mycelium with clamp connections between the hyphal cells are just the simplified standard example, used to make it easier to understand the fungal life cycle. In reality, most species show a different behaviour. Some already have two or more nuclei per spore, others never show clamp connections or do not even need a second nucleus to fruit. Usually more than two mycelia will fuse, forming a heterokaryotic mycelium, where a large number of different nuclei travel through the hyphal network.
I see a multispore culture as being made of several heterokaryotic hyphal networks rather than dikaryotic strains.


Jef said:
5.) A clone form a single fruitbody should represent a single genetically complete mycelium, the one that liked the substrate, could cope with all the competition and was the one to fruit soonest given the conditions I provided.  An isolate, Isolate 5, I will call it.

We are back to 1.) above now.

5a.) The next flush from the same substrate may be from an entirely different strain (and probably is), one that fruits later, for example. It could be cloned to agar. Isolate 5a.) doing step 1.) above, again.

6.) Isolate 5, and 5a. having now lived alone for a period of time will have had existing genes turned on or off by it's new experience.  This is described as an epigenetic process of changed acetylation states.

Although each might not have tried to stifle their rival while "growing out" on the original plate and later the substrate, they may (for the first time) do so now if meeting again on an agar plate now.

At my stage of life, I have become accustomed to and have grown to like living alone, without competition, strife or rival. Forcefully rejecting that which I would have formerly tolerated is part of that same curve. If you say that I am conscious and so I can form preferences and make choices, I think you give me too much credit and other creatures not enough.

7.) My understanding of immunity and rejection suggests that an organism recognises molecules as "self" or "not self" and further divides "not self" into harmless and pathogenic.

It may seem unlikely that epigenetic changes would be enough to make two samples of Isolate 5(above) form zones of aversion after being grown apart (for example on different substrates, under different temperatures in different atmospheres etc) but it is by no means impossible. They might consider each other "not self" and form zones of aversion.

A normal "sequence" DNA test would find these samples to be identical, making for a puzzling finding, but more in-depth tests would show that the acetylation (on or off) states of the genes were different between samples.

The lesson could be that no two things are truly the same, but that they only seem to be when we are unable to see them clearly enough.



A culture from a cloned fruitbody is not necessarily made of just one strain, especially when you started from a multispore culture. However, most likely it will consist of strong strains, which outcompeted others.

For the compatibility itself, there must be some kind of (surface molecule based) tissue compatibility, like you say, just like the one that is important for us when receiving an organ transplant.
Epigenetics will definitely play an important role, but the spores of one fruitbody are not genetically identical. Lets say the parent mycelium formed from two spores with different genetics. Now during fruiting when producing spores, meiosis and genetical recombination will happen, resulting in spores with different genetic information. How different should depend on the genetic diversity of the grandparents. This means if you germinate spores from a mushroom that was a hybrid of two very different strains, you should get lots of strains with a high variation of traits and probably lots of incompatible strains. Germinating spores of a mushroom that was inbred and selected for several generations should result in lots of compatible strains, showing very little variation.


Jef said:
Conclusion:

This is why I believe that it is of little profit to do aversion studies with mycelia and better to focus on fruit bodies and spores, which are, usefully, available together.

My two cents (more like two dollars) for today,

Jeff



Sure, these pairing experiments can be a hint, but no hard proof.

Carsten

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: Jef]
    #15439099 -

Jef said:
...
Quote:
Also, if it's a cloned tissue culture, single strain isolate, why is it assumed that there are half genes forming clamp connections?



Clamp connections are points where two compatible mycelia meet and exchange genetic information. Each mycelium, with half a set of chromosomes, gives the other a copy of its half so that both become identical throughout, now being one organism having a full set. It's like sperm meets egg. Yuck, fungus sex.:drysmash:

Any fruitable "strain" as you call it, should have a complete set, and although now a single being, it used to be two "half  beings" that merged and replicated each other's DNA.  Weird huh?
...



Let's get this straight.
Compatible mycelia fuse through anastomosis. Ordinary hyphae will branch off and connect the two. Then, complete nuclei will channel through these hyphae into the other mycelium. They will stay separate nuclei until the formation of spores. Only then, in the fruitbodies, sex will happen and the genetic material of the two nuclei will be combined/mixed. 

Clamp connection play a role in fungal cell division, when there is more than one nucleus and when we have a species, which forms clamp connections.

Carsten

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: Jef]
    #15439437 -

Quote:
5.) A clone form a single fruitbody should represent a single genetically complete mycelium, the one that liked the substrate, could cope with all the competition and was the one to fruit soonest given the conditions I provided.  An isolate, Isolate 5, I will call it.



As already pointed out above, this is a false assumption.
RR


--------------------
Download Let's Grow Mushrooms



semper in excretia sumus solim profundum variat

"I've never had a failed experiment.  I've only discovered 10,000 methods which do not work."
Thomas Edison

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: RogerRabbit]
    #15439906 -

I am looking for information on how common this (chimaeric fruitbodies) is, and whether or not it is more common in certain species than others. Preferably based on genetics. I did a literature search some time ago, but I only found that it can indeed happen in culture and in nature, but not how common it is.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: Pinback]
    #15443564 -

That question is another can of worms. *lol*
Maybe we should consider chimaeric fruitbodies as the rule and nonchimaeric ones as the exception. If we think about the extreme case of a sterile substrate bag inoculated with a single strain, we can only be sure of nonchimaeric fruits during the first flush. Then spores will be landing in the bag, some will germinate, join the network and turn the bag into a multi strain culture. From all I have read until now, I'm pretty sure that primordia will originate from hyphal aggregates, rather then from single cells, so chimaeric fruits should be pretty common during later flushes.

Regarding how often this will happen, perhaps our long time members can give us a hint how often sectoring occurs when cloning mushrooms.

Carsten

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: Mycelio]
    #15446999 -

Thanks Carsten,  never heard of anastomosis 'til now.

Quote:
From Wikipedia: For fungi, anastomosis is also a component of sex. In some fungi, two different haploid mating types — if compatible — merge. Somatically, they form a morphologically similar mycelial wave front that continues to grow and explore. The significant difference, is that in each septated unit is binucleate, containing two unfused nuclei, i.e. one from each parent that will eventually undergo karyogamy and meiosis to complete the sexual cycle.



I tried to avoid ten dollar words in my descriptions, and I imagined the nuclei fused on meeting (wrong!).

It doesnt surprise me that there exist more complicated unions than the one I described, but I also find it very interesting that you describe spores germinating on their parent substrate and joining the genetic fray.

Aint nature just marvelous.

Thanks for chiming in.

Jef


--------------------
I am my own lab rat.


Tell me and I will forget. Show me and I will remember.  Involve me and I will learn.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: Jef]
    #15448171 -

That is royal family levels of incest right there!  Serious in breeding of children with parents.

But surely the offspring can only have the same genes as the parent.  Paired differently sure but the offspring cannot just invent new genes.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Thinking out loud about strains - Am I wrong ? [Re: NSF]
    #15458023 -

Sure, there will be no introduction of new genes, but a new combination of the parental material plus a different activation pattern may provide quite some variation.

Carsten

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Cloning grocery store strains
( 1 2 all )
Anonymous 13,299 37 01/18/24 05:51 PM
by Southerner
* Cordyceps, stage one complete! [pics]
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Suntzu 33,307 76 06/11/09 11:34 AM
by vonswarrior
* Thinking of growing hippy_lettuce 2,511 7 01/26/02 07:41 AM
by zilch
* whats a good newbie strain for gourmet/medicinal? socratesmind 1,786 4 12/12/02 09:32 AM
by psyconaut
* Flammulina velutipes - all gone !
( 1 2 all )
AnnoA 9,443 27 11/05/03 12:39 AM
by Anno
* Why all this now, and the facts Mr. G 1,937 4 04/21/02 12:50 PM
by Anno
* shiitake mycelium WTF???? stan 6,437 14 03/28/11 10:23 AM
by Osama_Just
* almond portabella friggin wigga 1,896 2 11/22/02 08:06 AM
by friggin wigga

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: RogerRabbit, cronicr, Pastywhyte, Forrester, Stromrider, SHROOMSISAY01
677 topic views. 0 members, 44 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.024 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 16 queries.