Thanks for the enthusiasm everyone, it's very inspiring.
veda_sticks said: This is an interesting experiment, that i think other people should give a go and see how it works out.
There are points you make that make sense and this may be a very viable method.
The only thing is though is about the light, as yes the casing layer will be able to block some light, but if your using a good and strong enough light, it will be able to penetrate the casing and get to the sub. That is why alot of people recomend using a fluerescent daylight tube.
But having the sub exposed until it starts to pin does seem like a good idea as its less likely to colinise the casing (does the myc really colinise it, or does it just grow threw the casing??) plus the surface would seem to get exposed to much more FAE.
For good hyphel knot formation its important to have high humidity at the surface, if you can provide this without the casing layer (which shouldnt be to diffult) then leaving the casing layer till pins shouldnt be a problem (i think casings can relieve to need for high humidity for some people that struggle)
It seems to have worked well for you, i have seem casings done the regular way work just aswell except you have no colinisation of the casing.
Keep up the good work. Its good to try things for yourself and work out new ways of doing things.
Im gonna keep an eye on this and see how this develops.
I have never done casings before, but have done alot of reading into it, anything i have said might not be quite accurate, im just throwing some thoughts around. Its in no way meant to taken as saying you have a few things wrong or soething to that effect (im sure it doesnt come accross that way)
Experiment on, if people didnt experiment then we would all be stuck still doing the pf tek.
I'm not taking anything the wrong way at all. This definitely something new to me as well.. And all the points above that I make are just results of me brainstorming on the idea... I'm definitely not trying to seem like "this is the way it is", I also hope I'm not coming off as that. This just seems to be giving me consistent results. I actually decided to post this thread as a response to someone having a question about overlay in this thread... http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/7696965/an/0/page/0/gonew/1#UNREAD The idea being that if one was having lots of trouble with overlay, they could give this a try to try and solve that problem. 
Nibin said: What are the substrates? I imagine this system will work well with poo or coir but not very well with plain grain, as uncased it doesn't really fruit...
What are you using?
V interesting post btw
This also brings up a very important (I believe) point that I need to expand on... I whole heartedly agree that grains are hard to get to fruit by themselves... that Tex bin was done on popcorn but it had about a handful of moist to wet verm mixed in with the popcorn when it was laid out. so by no means was that a straight grain casing. I think that def. helped with the pinning, not to mention those are tex and they pin faster than any strain I've worked with, so it's not exactly difficult to get them to pin. But with those bulk bins, I think it's important to note how they are made. The top of the substrate is obviously the most important part of the sub due to that being where the fruits come from, so with that in mind this is how the tubs are made... The first three inches or so (bottom part of the sub) of the sub are mixed in with the grain spawn.. then after that is in the bin and flattened out, I take the remaining two qts of spawn and lay those out evenly in a layer on top of the sub... then I cover that grain layer with about an inch or so of Hpoo/straw.. I have found that esp. rye grows absolutely horribly by itself.. the fruits get to a certain point and then just shit out.
This happened here too

see how I laid grain out on top of the substrate? This is how that tub ended up...

there were other factors along with that that made that bin crappy compared to the recent ones I've done like poor rh and bacterial infection, but I believe the rye is responsible for them starting to abort after a certain size. I'm not sure if there is just a nute missing in the rye that the Hpoo/straw make up for or what, but that would be my guess. I came to this conclusion because I did multiple strains and tubs with just straight rye (plus a verm rez but that in non nutritious and shouldn't be a factor in fruit development) heres a tub of PE on straight rye.. I was doing a casing comparison.. actually did two of these tubs at the same time this is just one of them... the comparisons were that each quadrant of colonized grain was cased differently... one was plain fine verm... one was fine verm with coir... one was plain course verm... one was course verm with coir to see what casing would work best... this is how it turned out...

I was like WTF?? I KNOW I didn't make the environment that much different than the popcorn and wbs I've used...
Then I did a chitwan/nepal grow with straight rye and this is what it turned out like...

So I said thats it... it's gotta be the rye by itself that is fucking my shit up, at least the rye that I have... So I decided to put the rye under the inch layer of Hpoo/straw and they grew big and beautiful and healthy looking as ever. lol
So in conclusion, don't spread rye on the top of the bulk substrate, be sure to bury it under the bulk... I don't think that is an issue, however, with other grains such as wbs since I've not had a prob with any other grain besides rye.
The reason I think this also works besides the possible nute deficiency in rye is that when you put the bulk sub over the rye, it forces the myc to grow up through the bulk substrate... This produces ropey rhizos and is less likely to become matted, in effect the bulk sub actually becomes a pseudo casing layer... and if you expose the bin to light that whole time it is colonizing, by the time that that top layer is colonized, the substrate starts producing knots and pins from those ropey rhizos... and by late casing at this point, one is helping those knots and pins continue to form and thrive.
I guess thats all pretty important information I should have added from the get go but I've got a lot of projects going and sometimes I'm a space cadet.
This SA bin was done in the same fashion as the SA bin in that first post I did but the late casing was left off and you can see how that top inch bulk sub layer is acting like a pseudo casing and helping with the ropey rhizos... although it still isn't as prolific as that bin in the first post which is what I think the late casing helped do..

I think a lot of those knots on the bare spots on the top of that sub would have developed into pins had there been that extra thin late casing on there
the casing layer also helps with the pooling of water on the top of the substrate by absorbing some and preventing it also. 
Sillicybin said: I am intrigued by this... I currently have to tubs of grain spawned to coir running side by side that I might try this on, one cased traditionally and one "late cased."
Are you pH buffering your casing material? It seems to me that this would be key in preventing trich infection during subsequent flushes, otherwise the low pH of the uncolonized peat would be prime real estate for the green enemy.
I'm using coir/verm so I'm not using any buffer, but it's probably not a bad idea.
fahtster
Edited by fahtster (12/03/07 11:16 AM)
|