Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]
Neocon agenda
    #3149959 -

Does anyone have a link to that notorious agenda thing?

im sorry i cant be more precise , the document from which comes that notorious line about how to ensure american supremacy continued they needed 'another pearl harbour' ?

Im hoping someone knows what im refering to i really need a link to that.

Thanks alot


--------------------


Everything I post is fiction.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Moonshoe]
    #3149974 -

I think this is what you're looking for

SCARY


--------------------
Re-Defeat Bush in '04

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Skikid16]
    #3150024 -

and their about to go nuts too..after bush wins...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Annapurna1]
    #3150034 -

If Bush wins, the reaction of the neocons will be a fart in a windstorm compared to the reaction of the neocoms.

pinky


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Annapurna1]
    #3150037 -

What's wrong, you're not looking forward to war against Iran, greater debt, military conscription and increased numbers of people developing an all consuming hatred for Americans and the U.S. (read: 'more terrorists')?


--------------------
To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.'  Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence.  Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains.  Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Evolving]
    #3150041 -

BTW, Kerry's bought and paid for too.


--------------------
To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.'  Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence.  Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains.  Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
    #3150109 -

Quote:
neocoms

What's this neocoMs you speak of?


--------------------
Re-Defeat Bush in '04

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Skikid16]
    #3150126 -

Annapurna1 refers to one who supports individual freedom (a Capitalist or Libertarian, for example) as a "neocon". The "con" part is a contraction of "conservative".

It stands to reason therefore that one against individual freedom (a Lefty or Libbie, for example) could be referred to as a "neocom", where the "com" is a contraction of "communist".

pinky


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Skikid16]
    #3150140 -

SCARIER

I expect phase III of operation enduring domination to begin
on november 10th.

hello, Iran!


--------------------
All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
    #3150142 -

pinksharkmark said:
Annapurna1 refers to one who supports individual freedom (a Capitalist or Libertarian, for example) as a "neocon". The "con" part is a contraction of "conservative".

It stands to reason therefore that one against individual freedom (a Lefty or Libbie, for example) could be referred to as a "neocom", where the "com" is a contraction of "communist".

pinky


Whoa there partner. Being liberal is not about less freedoms. It's not even about big government necessarily. I think you're confusing democrats, liberals, socialists and communists. Or something. Take me, I'm fiscally conservative but very socially liberal.


--------------------
Happiness is a warm gun...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
    #3150175 -

I thought so, I just wasn't sure if it was a new term being thrown around by the pundits, or just a witty catch phrase. 

Gotcha  :thumbup:


--------------------
Re-Defeat Bush in '04

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: afoaf]
    #3150194 -

I think that we'll be performing air strikes on their nuclear plant sometime in nov/dec if....errr....when Bush is re-defeated....errr... re-elected.


--------------------
Re-Defeat Bush in '04

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: unbeliever]
    #3150214 -

unbeliever writes:

Being liberal is not about less freedoms.

Sigh. If by that you mean "classical liberal" in the mode of the Founding Fathers, you are correct. But in today's America, "Liberal" has for at least half a century (if not more) referred to the Democrat type. I had thought the juxtaposition of "Lefty" with "Libbie" had made it clear which definition of Libbie I referred to.

Take me, I'm fiscally conservative but very socially liberal.

So you would identify yourself more closely with a Laissez-faire Capitalist or a Libertarian viewpoint than with the current American Democrat viewpoint? If so, you are neither a "Lefty" nor a "Libbie" and therefore not a neocom.

pinky


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Skikid16]
    #3150221 -

Skikid16 writes:

I think that we'll be performing air strikes on their nuclear plant sometime in nov/dec...

Not if the Israelis get there first.

pinky


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
    #3150236 -

pinksharkmark said:
unbeliever writes:

Being liberal is not about less freedoms.

Sigh. If by that you mean "classical liberal" in the mode of the Founding Fathers, you are correct. But in today's America, "Liberal" has for at least half a century (if not more) referred to the Democrat type. I had thought the juxtaposition of "Lefty" with "Libbie" had made it clear which definition of Libbie I referred to.

Take me, I'm fiscally conservative but very socially liberal.

So you would identify yourself more closely with a Laissez-faire Capitalist or a Libertarian viewpoint than with the current American Democrat viewpoint? If so, you are neither a "Lefty" nor a "Libbie" and therefore not a neocom.

pinky


Definitely not laissez-faire. While I"m not sure the current union situation is the best solution, workers definitely need to be protected, especially in a capitalistic society. I'm not libertarian either, I don't believe in the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" garbage, nor do I think government should have absolutely no involvement.

Anyway, NeoCon, refers to the "new conservatives". Most typically this refers to the elite upper class, typically white. They want to protect (conserve) their way of life. Understandable, but under the near-epithetical neocon umbrella it typically means doing so at the expense of others. This I do not agree with either. Neocons for example would support the constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Ambiguous and hypocritical adherance and insistance on religious and moral values also play a big part in it. In any case, a lot of times people use neocon as an insult, with all the conspiracy and extremist baggage attached.

As for NeoCom, I've not heard that before but it stands to reason it is just a reversal targetting a different group (communists I guess) for much the same reason, to provide an easy hateful label. Sadly liberal also gets used as a "dirty" word by some rabid people.

*shrug* They're all just labels and only fit as well as the person using them and the person they're being applied to allow them.


--------------------
Happiness is a warm gun...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
    #3150275 -

Quote:
Not if the Israelis get there first.

I'm not sure if they're willing to stick their necks out like that yet. It seems they have their hands full with Palestinian terrorist. If they actually took a preemptive action against a "sovereign" muslim nation, I could only imagine the jihadists.

edit: took a preemptive, not to


--------------------
Re-Defeat Bush in '04

Edited by Skikid16 (09/17/04 11:06 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: unbeliever]
    #3150313 -

unbeliever writes:

Definitely not laissez-faire. While I"m not sure the current union situation is the best solution, workers definitely need to be protected, especially in a capitalistic society.

What makes you think Laissez-faire Capitalists object to unions? We don't. We do object to compulsory union membership, of course.

I'm not libertarian either, I don't believe in the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" garbage...

Unsure what you mean by that.

... nor do I think government should have absolutely no involvement.

No involvement in what?

Anyway, NeoCon, refers to the "new conservatives".

Actually, no it doesn't. It refers to those who used to be Lefties but abandoned Leftie ideology at some point.

As for NeoCom, I've not heard that before but it stands to reason it is just a reversal targetting a different group (communists I guess) for much the same reason, to provide an easy hateful label.

I made it up as a response to Annapurna1's incessant misuse of the term "neocon". For all I know someone else has used it before I dreamed it up, but I have yet to see anyone use it other than myself. It seems so obvious a rejoinder that I can't believe I'm the first to use it. If I am I'll file for a copyright.

pinky


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
    #3150329 -

Whoops! Seems a real NeoCon, David Horowitz, had the idea before me: http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Printable.asp?ID=7590

I knew it was too obvious not to have been thought of by others. No copyright for me.

pinky


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
    #3150456 -

pinksharkmark said:
If Bush wins, the reaction of the neocons will be a fart in a windstorm compared to the reaction of the neocoms.

pinky


i cant speak for all the neocoms here..but ive already made several posts to the effect that we have nothing left to bitch about once the voters make their choice...and personally..i doubt youll even hear a fart from most liberals...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Annapurna1]
    #3150991 -

Quote:
and personally..i doubt youll even hear a fart from most liberals...


I'd be very surprised were that to turn out to be true.

After all.... they're still bitching about a legally won, yet somehow magically "stolen" election years later.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Any Anarcho-Capitalists/Libertarians present?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )		 Jkinder313 5,764 100 01/20/15 05:05 PM
by zappaisgod
* Libertarian discussions (both for and against)
( 1 2 3 4 ... 10 11 all )		 psyconaught 11,370 200 11/02/13 12:13 PM
by MaxwellSmart
* I cant stand Libertarians....
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all )		 vader34 9,363 160 12/27/12 11:49 AM
by Gilgamesh18
* Pentagon insider discusses Neocon agenda re: Iraq GernBlanston 684 3 02/24/04 12:06 AM
by Xlea321
* Neocons and psychedelics
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )		 Xlea321 10,339 152 04/20/06 06:05 PM
by Luddite
* What is a neocon?
( 1 2 3 4 all )		 silversoul7 5,741 78 01/21/05 08:35 PM
by blacksabbathrulz
* 34 Libertarian arguments debunked silversoul7 2,652 7 05/09/03 05:06 AM
by Phred
* Libertarians?
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )		 Libertine 15,464 156 08/17/08 05:28 PM
by ScavengerType

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
2,253 topic views. 2 members, 210 guests and 71 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.024 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 16 queries.