Home | Community | Message Board


High Mountain Compost
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
OfflineGernBlanston
unintended sideeffect

Registered: 05/28/03
Posts: 841
Loc: In my pants
Last seen: 6 years, 1 month
Pentagon insider discusses Neocon agenda re: Iraq
    #2373958 - 02/24/04 12:34 AM (14 years, 2 months ago)



--------------------
There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people.
  --  Howard Zinn


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblemabus
anguish this!

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 956
Re: Pentagon insider discusses Neocon agenda re: Iraq [Re: GernBlanston]
    #2373990 - 02/24/04 12:45 AM (14 years, 2 months ago)

I mean, these people have total disrespect for the Constitution. We swear an oath, military officers and NCOs alike swear an oath to uphold the Constitution. These people have no respect for the Constitution

chilling


--------------------

http://www.sacredshrooms.org


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineFrankieJustTrypt
and fell

Registered: 01/27/04
Posts: 537
Loc: MI
Last seen: 3 years, 10 months
Re: Pentagon insider discusses Neocon agenda re: Iraq [Re: GernBlanston]
    #2374100 - 02/24/04 01:20 AM (14 years, 2 months ago)

I found this part particularly telling:


Quote:

So if, as you argue, they knew there weren?t any of these WMD, then what exactly drove the neoconservatives to war?







The neoconservatives pride themselves on having a global vision, a long-term strategic perspective. And there were three reasons why they felt the U.S. needed to topple Saddam, put in a friendly government and occupy Iraq.








One of those reasons is that sanctions and containment were working and everybody pretty much knew it. Many companies around the world were preparing to do business with Iraq in anticipation of a lifting of sanctions. But the U.S. and the U.K. had been bombing northern and southern Iraq since 1991. So it was very unlikely that we would be in any kind of position to gain significant contracts in any post-sanctions Iraq. And those sanctions were going to be lifted soon, Saddam would still be in place, and we would get no financial benefit.







The second reason has to do with our military-basing posture in the region. We had been very dissatisfied with our relations with Saudi Arabia, particularly the restrictions on our basing. And also there was dissatisfaction from the people of Saudi Arabia. So we were looking for alternate strategic locations beyond Kuwait, beyond Qatar, to secure something we had been searching for since the days of Carter ? to secure the energy lines of communication in the region. Bases in Iraq, then, were very important ? that is, if you hold that is America?s role in the world. Saddam Hussein was not about to invite us in.






The last reason is the conversion, the switch Saddam Hussein made in the Food for Oil program, from the dollar to the euro. He did this, by the way, long before 9/11, in November 2000 ? selling his oil for euros. The oil sales permitted in that program aren?t very much. But when the sanctions would be lifted, the sales from the country with the second largest oil reserves on the planet would have been moving to the euro.







The U.S. dollar is in a sensitive period because we are a debtor nation now. Our currency is still popular, but it?s not backed up like it used to be. If oil, a very solid commodity, is traded on the euro, that could cause massive, almost glacial, shifts in confidence in trading on the dollar. So one of the first executive orders that Bush signed in May [2003] switched trading on Iraq?s oil back to the dollar.







--------------------
If you want a free lunch, you need to learn how to eat good advice.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleXlea321
Stranger
Registered: 02/26/01
Posts: 9,134
Re: Pentagon insider discusses Neocon agenda re: Iraq [Re: GernBlanston]
    #2374207 - 02/24/04 02:06 AM (14 years, 2 months ago)

Thanks for that Gern.  :thumbup:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Lies and War: Leo Strauss, the Neocons, and Iraq Zahid 461 1 10/22/03 09:28 AM
by Zahid
* Neocon agenda
( 1 2 all )
Moonshoe 1,779 29 09/19/04 03:30 AM
by ekomstop
* Neocons and psychedelics
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
Xlea321 8,355 152 04/20/06 08:05 PM
by Luddite
* Pilot believed alive, held in Iraq Ellis Dee 802 7 03/12/02 03:20 PM
by madscientist
* Kerry would have still approved Iraq operation without WMD
( 1 2 all )
HagbardCeline 2,078 20 08/11/04 07:32 AM
by Xlea321
* A question involving Iraq Cracka_X 597 14 01/30/03 02:10 AM
by mntlfngrs
* What is a neocon?
( 1 2 3 4 all )
silversoul7 4,890 78 01/21/05 10:35 PM
by blacksabbathrulz
* Inside America's 'Colossal Blunder'... SquattingMarmot 477 3 09/30/03 12:00 PM
by Xlea321

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
582 topic views. 7 members, 5 guests and 6 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Avalon Magic Plants
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2018 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.03 seconds spending 0.011 seconds on 19 queries.