|
 Moonshoe
Blue Mantis
Registered: 05/28/04
Posts: 27,202
Loc: Iceland
|
 Neocon agenda 
#3149959 - 09/17/04 08:33 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Does anyone have a link to that notorious agenda thing?
im sorry i cant be more precise , the document from which comes that notorious line about how to ensure american supremacy continued they needed 'another pearl harbour' ?
Im hoping someone knows what im refering to i really need a link to that.
Thanks alot
--------------------
Everything I post is fiction.
|
 Skikid16
fungus fan
Registered: 06/27/02
Posts: 5,666
Loc: In the middle of the nort...
Last seen: 19 years, 14 days
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Moonshoe]
#3149974 - 09/17/04 08:39 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I think this is what you're looking for
SCARY
--------------------
Re-Defeat Bush in '04
|
Annapurna1
liberal pussy
Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,646
Loc: innsmouth..MA
|
 Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Skikid16]
#3150024 - 09/17/04 08:55 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
and their about to go nuts too..after bush wins...
--------------------
"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...
|
Phred
Fred's son
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
|
|
If Bush wins, the reaction of the neocons will be a fart in a windstorm compared to the reaction of the neocoms.
pinky
--------------------
|
Evolving
Resident Cynic
Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
|
|
What's wrong, you're not looking forward to war against Iran, greater debt, military conscription and increased numbers of people developing an all consuming hatred for Americans and the U.S. (read: 'more terrorists')?
--------------------
To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.' Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence. Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains. Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.
|
Evolving
Resident Cynic
Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Evolving]
#3150041 - 09/17/04 08:59 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
BTW, Kerry's bought and paid for too.
--------------------
To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.' Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence. Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains. Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.
|
Skikid16
fungus fan
Registered: 06/27/02
Posts: 5,666
Loc: In the middle of the nort...
Last seen: 19 years, 14 days
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
#3150109 - 09/17/04 09:29 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
neocoms
What's this neocoMs you speak of?
--------------------
Re-Defeat Bush in '04
|
Phred
Fred's son
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Skikid16]
#3150126 - 09/17/04 09:37 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Annapurna1 refers to one who supports individual freedom (a Capitalist or Libertarian, for example) as a "neocon". The "con" part is a contraction of "conservative".
It stands to reason therefore that one against individual freedom (a Lefty or Libbie, for example) could be referred to as a "neocom", where the "com" is a contraction of "communist".
pinky
--------------------
|
afoaf
CEO DBK?
Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 32,665
Loc: Ripple's Heart
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Skikid16]
#3150140 - 09/17/04 09:43 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
SCARIER
I expect phase III of operation enduring domination to begin
on november 10th.
hello, Iran!
--------------------
All I know is The Growery is a place where losers who get banned here go.
|
unbeliever
Yo Daddy!
Registered: 05/22/04
Posts: 5,158
Loc: Gallifrey
Last seen: 15 years, 1 month
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
#3150142 - 09/17/04 09:45 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
pinksharkmark said:
Annapurna1 refers to one who supports individual freedom (a Capitalist or Libertarian, for example) as a "neocon". The "con" part is a contraction of "conservative".
It stands to reason therefore that one against individual freedom (a Lefty or Libbie, for example) could be referred to as a "neocom", where the "com" is a contraction of "communist".
pinky
Whoa there partner. Being liberal is not about less freedoms. It's not even about big government necessarily. I think you're confusing democrats, liberals, socialists and communists. Or something. Take me, I'm fiscally conservative but very socially liberal.
--------------------
Happiness is a warm gun...
|
Skikid16
fungus fan
Registered: 06/27/02
Posts: 5,666
Loc: In the middle of the nort...
Last seen: 19 years, 14 days
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
#3150175 - 09/17/04 09:51 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I thought so, I just wasn't sure if it was a new term being thrown around by the pundits, or just a witty catch phrase.
Gotcha 
--------------------
Re-Defeat Bush in '04
|
Skikid16
fungus fan
Registered: 06/27/02
Posts: 5,666
Loc: In the middle of the nort...
Last seen: 19 years, 14 days
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: afoaf]
#3150194 - 09/17/04 09:55 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
I think that we'll be performing air strikes on their nuclear plant sometime in nov/dec if....errr....when Bush is re-defeated....errr... re-elected.
--------------------
Re-Defeat Bush in '04
|
Phred
Fred's son
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
|
|
unbeliever writes:
Being liberal is not about less freedoms.
Sigh. If by that you mean "classical liberal" in the mode of the Founding Fathers, you are correct. But in today's America, "Liberal" has for at least half a century (if not more) referred to the Democrat type. I had thought the juxtaposition of "Lefty" with "Libbie" had made it clear which definition of Libbie I referred to.
Take me, I'm fiscally conservative but very socially liberal.
So you would identify yourself more closely with a Laissez-faire Capitalist or a Libertarian viewpoint than with the current American Democrat viewpoint? If so, you are neither a "Lefty" nor a "Libbie" and therefore not a neocom.
pinky
--------------------
|
Phred
Fred's son
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Skikid16]
#3150221 - 09/17/04 10:00 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Skikid16 writes:
I think that we'll be performing air strikes on their nuclear plant sometime in nov/dec...
Not if the Israelis get there first.
pinky
--------------------
|
unbeliever
Yo Daddy!
Registered: 05/22/04
Posts: 5,158
Loc: Gallifrey
Last seen: 15 years, 1 month
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
#3150236 - 09/17/04 10:07 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
pinksharkmark said:
unbeliever writes:
Being liberal is not about less freedoms.
Sigh. If by that you mean "classical liberal" in the mode of the Founding Fathers, you are correct. But in today's America, "Liberal" has for at least half a century (if not more) referred to the Democrat type. I had thought the juxtaposition of "Lefty" with "Libbie" had made it clear which definition of Libbie I referred to.
Take me, I'm fiscally conservative but very socially liberal.
So you would identify yourself more closely with a Laissez-faire Capitalist or a Libertarian viewpoint than with the current American Democrat viewpoint? If so, you are neither a "Lefty" nor a "Libbie" and therefore not a neocom.
pinky
Definitely not laissez-faire. While I"m not sure the current union situation is the best solution, workers definitely need to be protected, especially in a capitalistic society. I'm not libertarian either, I don't believe in the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" garbage, nor do I think government should have absolutely no involvement.
Anyway, NeoCon, refers to the "new conservatives". Most typically this refers to the elite upper class, typically white. They want to protect (conserve) their way of life. Understandable, but under the near-epithetical neocon umbrella it typically means doing so at the expense of others. This I do not agree with either. Neocons for example would support the constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Ambiguous and hypocritical adherance and insistance on religious and moral values also play a big part in it. In any case, a lot of times people use neocon as an insult, with all the conspiracy and extremist baggage attached.
As for NeoCom, I've not heard that before but it stands to reason it is just a reversal targetting a different group (communists I guess) for much the same reason, to provide an easy hateful label. Sadly liberal also gets used as a "dirty" word by some rabid people.
*shrug* They're all just labels and only fit as well as the person using them and the person they're being applied to allow them.
--------------------
Happiness is a warm gun...
|
Skikid16
fungus fan
Registered: 06/27/02
Posts: 5,666
Loc: In the middle of the nort...
Last seen: 19 years, 14 days
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
#3150275 - 09/17/04 10:25 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Not if the Israelis get there first.
I'm not sure if they're willing to stick their necks out like that yet. It seems they have their hands full with Palestinian terrorist. If they actually took a preemptive action against a "sovereign" muslim nation, I could only imagine the jihadists.
edit: took a preemptive, not to
--------------------
Re-Defeat Bush in '04
Edited by Skikid16 (09/17/04 11:06 PM)
|
Phred
Fred's son
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
|
|
unbeliever writes:
Definitely not laissez-faire. While I"m not sure the current union situation is the best solution, workers definitely need to be protected, especially in a capitalistic society.
What makes you think Laissez-faire Capitalists object to unions? We don't. We do object to compulsory union membership, of course.
I'm not libertarian either, I don't believe in the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" garbage...
Unsure what you mean by that.
... nor do I think government should have absolutely no involvement.
No involvement in what?
Anyway, NeoCon, refers to the "new conservatives".
Actually, no it doesn't. It refers to those who used to be Lefties but abandoned Leftie ideology at some point.
As for NeoCom, I've not heard that before but it stands to reason it is just a reversal targetting a different group (communists I guess) for much the same reason, to provide an easy hateful label.
I made it up as a response to Annapurna1's incessant misuse of the term "neocon". For all I know someone else has used it before I dreamed it up, but I have yet to see anyone use it other than myself. It seems so obvious a rejoinder that I can't believe I'm the first to use it. If I am I'll file for a copyright.
pinky
--------------------
|
Phred
Fred's son
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 3 months
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
#3150329 - 09/17/04 10:42 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Whoops! Seems a real NeoCon, David Horowitz, had the idea before me: http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Printable.asp?ID=7590
I knew it was too obvious not to have been thought of by others. No copyright for me.
pinky
--------------------
|
Annapurna1
liberal pussy
Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,646
Loc: innsmouth..MA
|
Re: Neocon agenda [Re: Phred]
#3150456 - 09/17/04 11:31 PM (19 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
pinksharkmark said:
If Bush wins, the reaction of the neocons will be a fart in a windstorm compared to the reaction of the neocoms.
pinky
i cant speak for all the neocoms here..but ive already made several posts to the effect that we have nothing left to bitch about once the voters make their choice...and personally..i doubt youll even hear a fart from most liberals...
--------------------
"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
|
Quote:
and personally..i doubt youll even hear a fart from most liberals...
I'd be very surprised were that to turn out to be true.
After all.... they're still bitching about a legally won, yet somehow magically "stolen" election years later.
--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Shop: Red Vein Kratom
Edit 
Reply 
1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
Jkinder313
psyconaught
GernBlanston
silversoul7
Libertine