Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   North Spore Bulk Substrate

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4  [ show all ]
Re: 90% failure on PF -TEK. Any help will be appreciated. [Re: RockinRobot] * 4
    #29655992 -

OK, this has gotten ridiculous.

1.Updated PF-Tek Guide 2023 Edition specifically lists a steam time of 90-120 minutes. Op says he does 120. Why should him buying new equipment be a prerequisite for receiving help when he's literally using an approved method for PF Tek sterilization?

2. Stipe says boiling water is sufficient for sterilizing syringes OP may or may not be sterilizing the container they mix their spores in, but no one has directly asked. Ya'll just assume he's wrong

3. Rev's BRF Tek specifically calls for using a filter and agar, and lists one of the potential uses as dealing with contamination. Not one of you mentioned or gave advice about using this to clean up a culture. BRF Puck to Water Agar CS cleaned up a bacterial AF LC for me. This will get rid of all but the most stubborn bacteria. The only difference is he uses MP tape instead of a SFD, but MP tape can be used for Grain if you layer it. It's old info, but still works. If it didn't work his pucks would trich out.

4. OP has had success for multiple years and the problem is recent. While it is possible laziness has creeped into his process, but it's far more likely that he has some kind of unknown contamination in his spore print. BRF is resistant to bacteria, but it's not fool proof. Some bacteria can move on it's own. If he has that, then no transfers, BRF Pucks, teks, etc... will work.

Ya'll are giving out garbage and contradictory information and getting pissy when someone doesn't immediately accept it.


--------------------
I've got skills, they don't know where to use me
I'm like the best dressed guy at the nude beach
Nice to meet you!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: 90% failure on PF -TEK. Any help will be appreciated. [Re: PuffM4gicDr4gon] * 5
    #29656007 -

It has gotten ridiculous. This thread has become a catastrophic train wreck precipitated by imprecise communication on many sides.

We should all calm down and remember why we are here. OP your initial post wasn't a great start and got things off on the wrong foot. Many people then went off without all the information but with good intentions, which of course didn't land well. Back and forth and what I've taken away is;

OP should run some blank media and perhaps test the genetic samples to determine what the vector is. Until that is done little can be achieved via bickering.

I'd like to not have to lock this thread, would be nice to see some positive resolution at the end. But let's tone it down a bit so I don't need to put on my mod hat.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: 90% failure on PF -TEK. Any help will be appreciated. [Re: RockinRobot]
    #29656095 -

RockinRobot said:
What issues?

I personally told you the way you make your spore syringes is bunk. Several members told you you aren't sterilizing your jars enough or correctly. You can get away with steaming PF-TEK without a PC but it takes much longer. Several also commented on your agar including myself.

You threw every comment back in someones face. Starting to think you belong on Reddit instead of here. They will tell you whatever you want to hear over there.





And once again, you comment and say that you’ve pointed out things I could change, but you don’t explain why, why  a single one of them is actually wrong. Everything you’ve mentioned has already been reviewed and is fine.

You make many claims that are incorrect.  And then you complain that I don't accept your “suggestions” and throw them back in your face.

RockinRobot said:-"I personally told you the way you make your spore syringes is bunk" - Is not , boiling water in syringe is a valid methid for years-

RockinRobot said:-"Several members told you you aren't sterilizing your jars enough or correctly. really? Sterelizing 2 hours is not enought" - explain  me why.  Tell me why i am  sterelizing incorrectly.

I don't know what the problem is: a lack of memory, comprehension, logic  or IQ.

Once again, you make an effort to comment and attack me, while putting zero effort into actually helping.

You’re the one who belongs on Reddit, with your condescending attitude and the way you talk down to people. I genuinely don’t understand why you waste your energy writing this kind of bullshit.
It’s more than obvious that your intention isn’t to help me, but to lecture and reprimand me because you didn’t like my attitude or the way I responded to your friends. So please, stop writing attacks against me disguised as fake, condescending attempts to “help.”
All you’re doing is diverting attention away from the actual topic and turning it into drama. You’ve literally given me zero advice and nothing I could add to my current method. Stop please. You can ignore me and dont waste your and mine time.</font>

Do I belong to Reddit? You're the one who can't even read the post and understand it, who just keeps repeating the same things over and over without stopping to think or analyze them. That's exactly how people on Reddit behave.You don't accept me questioning what you say because you assume you know more or that you're somehow superior. You take that for granted without stopping to consider that you might actually be wrong.None of your advice makes any sense.You're incapable of being helpful, whether it's due to your lack of knowledge or your lack of concentration and reading comprehension, just like the kids on Reddit.Then spare me your disrespect by calling me a "Reddit user."

Edited by WhiteDemon (08/27/26 12:16 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: 90% failure on PF -TEK. Any help will be appreciated. [Re: PuffM4gicDr4gon] * 1
    #29656097 -

PuffM4gicDr4gon said:


PuffM4gicDr4gon said:
OK, this has gotten ridiculous.

1.Updated PF-Tek Guide 2023 Edition specifically lists a steam time of 90-120 minutes. Op says he does 120. Why should him buying new equipment be a prerequisite for receiving help when he's literally using an approved method for PF Tek sterilization?

2. Stipe says boiling water is sufficient for sterilizing syringes OP may or may not be sterilizing the container they mix their spores in, but no one has directly asked. Ya'll just assume he's wrong

3. Rev's BRF Tek specifically calls for using a filter and agar, and lists one of the potential uses as dealing with contamination. Not one of you mentioned or gave advice about using this to clean up a culture. BRF Puck to Water Agar CS cleaned up a bacterial AF LC for me. This will get rid of all but the most stubborn bacteria. The only difference is he uses MP tape instead of a SFD, but MP tape can be used for Grain if you layer it. It's old info, but still works. If it didn't work his pucks would trich out.

4. OP has had success for multiple years and the problem is recent. While it is possible laziness has creeped into his process, but it's far more likely that he has some kind of unknown contamination in his spore print. BRF is resistant to bacteria, but it's not fool proof. Some bacteria can move on it's own. If he has that, then no transfers, BRF Pucks, teks, etc... will work.

Ya'll are giving out garbage and contradictory information and getting pissy when someone doesn't immediately accept it.



Thank you so much. Thankfully, there are still some people who actually want to help and stay focused on the topic.:heart:
At least someone actually read the post.


--------------------
- A Dreamer in the Nightmare of being Awake -


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: 90% failure on PF -TEK. Any help will be appreciated. [Re: Pastywhyte]
    #29656102 -

Pastywhyte said:
OP should run some blank media and perhaps test the genetic samples to determine what the vector is. Until that is done little can be achieved via bickering.


I'd like to not have to lock this thread, would be nice to see some positive resolution at the end. But let's tone it down a bit so I don't need to put on my mod hat.



Thank you so much. I’ve made some PF Tek jars and left them uninoculated to see if the sterilization is what’s failing this year.
Many of the users who replied to me had no real interest in reading the post or helping. Their intentions may have been good, but their inability to understand it made their responses useless. They assume that if the results are bad, it must be because I don’t know what I’m doing and that I’m a complete noob. They can’t seem to consider any other possibility. Correlation does not imply causation.


--------------------
- A Dreamer in the Nightmare of being Awake -


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: 90% failure on PF -TEK. Any help will be appreciated. [Re: WhiteDemon] * 5
    #29656126 -

WhiteDemon said:
Pastywhyte said:
OP should run some blank media and perhaps test the genetic samples to determine what the vector is. Until that is done little can be achieved via bickering.


I'd like to not have to lock this thread, would be nice to see some positive resolution at the end. But let's tone it down a bit so I don't need to put on my mod hat.



Thank you so much. I’ve made some PF Tek jars and left them uninoculated to see if the sterilization is what’s failing this year.
Many of the users who replied to me had no real interest in reading the post or helping. Their intentions may have been good, but their inability to understand it made their responses useless. They assume that if the results are bad, it must be because I don’t know what I’m doing and that I’m a complete noob. They can’t seem to consider any other possibility. Correlation does not imply causation.




True but in the OP you had many details wrong. Right off the bat seeing incorrect verm to brf to water ratios is going to make seasoned people think you are not following the tek. Yes you did correct the information later on but thats also easy to miss sometimes. Lets calm down, stop the flaming (no one should be on reddit) and ease the triple posting.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: 90% failure on PF -TEK. Any help will be appreciated. [Re: Pastywhyte] * 1
    #29656141 -

If there has been a misunderstanding, I apologize. That was never my intention.
It’s just the frustration of something I’ve been doing for years suddenly stopping giving me results. Going from having entire monotubs full of bulk and boxes full of PF Tek cakes to not having a single jar colonize, for no apparent reason. And then having people come along telling me that I don’t know how to do PF Tek and that what I’m doing doesn’t even remotely resemble it, and that BRF pucks are something I just made up and this TEK don’t even exist...


Even so, my intention is not to argue or fight. I just wanted and hoped for some help, or perhaps for someone to point out something I hadn’t thought of.


--------------------
- A Dreamer in the Nightmare of being Awake -


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: 90% failure on PF -TEK. Any help will be appreciated. [Re: WhiteDemon] * 1
    #29656145 -

You need to narrow the vector first and foremost and we can’t do that until we limit the variables. Everything else until that point is just talk.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: 90% failure on PF -TEK. Any help will be appreciated. [Re: WhiteDemon] * 2
    #29656462 -

Maybe an extra control with blank syringes would also be reasonable then. Prepare these like you usually would, just without spores. Then inoculate like you usually do. Could narrow it down to something in that process, either making syringes or sterile technique. And if that’s clean too, maybe it narrows it to some really funky prints.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4  [ show all ]

Shop: Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   North Spore Bulk Substrate


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* PF-TEK Growing problems bill915 1,921 6 10/25/03 02:43 PM
by abhi
* Pf tek newbie Q Natural2me 4,339 13 03/13/17 08:30 PM
by Shrewmdoom
* PF Tek = waste of time
( 1 2 all )
Anonymous 20,034 32 07/15/26 06:10 PM
by sandman420
* Can Contam Spread From Jar To Jar?? (pf tek brf) PooGrower 5,031 7 12/04/02 02:18 AM
by Bi0TeK
* PF Tek, results of 100% replacing BRF with Millet flour Shroomanton 7,422 6 12/15/03 01:35 AM
by Hanky
* Filter Disks and the PF-tek question!!!! strawberryscoop 3,234 2 07/30/02 10:03 AM
by Doublethink
* PF Tek is shitty
( 1 2 all )
igore 5,048 21 07/10/03 09:50 PM
by Anonymous
* Ambiguous point in the PF tek Chibboleth 994 5 01/08/03 04:24 AM
by dog

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, veggie, mushboy, fahtster, the_chosen_one, LogicaL Chaos, 13shrooms, hamloaf, cronicr, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta, Tormato, Land Trout, A.k.a
1,034 topic views. 16 members, 2,488 guests and 226 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.033 seconds spending 0.011 seconds on 15 queries.