Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | | Last >
Re: Sanders [Re: Tantrika] * 3
    #26407993 -

Tantrika said:
Bigbadwooof said:
Ran-D said:
Bigbadwooof said:
Simulation theory, bro.


Kinda funny and ironic how an entire generation that openly mocks the idea of creation is so quick to believe in simulation. Cuz Joe Rogan said so.

Sorry, way off topic.


Cuz Joe Rogan said so lmao!

I love Joey boy, but my opinion is actually based on sound logic, and I'm sure I've posted about simulation theory on this here forum, long before JR started talking about it.

Stephen Hawking, and Neil deGrasse Tyson have both suggested that there is merit to the idea. In fact, check this shit out:



Also, I like to entertain the idea, but at the end of the day, I will always tell you that I don't know. You won't find any creationists doing that, and there is a whole other set of garbage that one must swallow, when they start down that road.


the repeat use of "for their own entertainment"
makes me think of the Hindu concept of Lila
which could take it a step further, and presume the individual who programmed the simulation did so as a VR experience and then inserted themself into the project


I think you just effectively made the case that Donald Trump is a 5th dimensional child, running a simulated reality, where he runs the world, and is rich, and fucks a supermodel, and a pornstar.

Honestly, sounds pretty goddamn logical to me.


--------------------
"It is no measure of good health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society," - Jiddu Krishnamurti
FARTS
"No my dog won't bite you, tho it had the right to. You ought to give him credit, cuz he knows I woulda let him" - Modest Mouse (And Wooof!)
Every one of you should see this video.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Bigbadwooof] * 1
    #26407999 -

:hahawtf:

Just trying to get the sight of orange pubic hairs out of my mind.


--------------------
“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: SirTripAlot] * 1
    #26408092 -

SirTripAlot said:
:hahawtf:

Just trying to get the sight of orange pubic hairs out of my mind.


And stormy danniels is trying to get them out of her teeth. This simulation has been kinder to some than others.


--------------------
"It is no measure of good health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society," - Jiddu Krishnamurti
FARTS
"No my dog won't bite you, tho it had the right to. You ought to give him credit, cuz he knows I woulda let him" - Modest Mouse (And Wooof!)
Every one of you should see this video.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Bigbadwooof]
    #26414068 -

I'm hoping we get some good news in the first primaries and especially Super Tuesday. Right now RealClearPolitics is showing Biden 10 or 11 points ahead of Bernie in multiple polls.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Brian Jones]
    #26414100 -

Brian Jones said:
I'm hoping we get some good news in the first primaries and especially Super Tuesday. Right now RealClearPolitics is showing Biden 10 or 11 points ahead of Bernie in multiple polls.


Again, how do we know those polls aren't completely made up? I seriously find it extremely hard to believe that Biden is leading. To me it's more likely that they are just going to choose him mo matter what because he's a fucking puppet.

Has anyone in here actually talked to a real living person that prefers Biden to Bernie? Because I think they only exist on TV.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Ran-D] * 1
    #26414143 -

I've talked to people this week that prefer Biden because they don't think a socialist can get elected. I argue that the only thing Biden has going for him is that he isn't Trump, but they think he's a necessary compromise. I tell them that the same polls also show Bernie soundly beating Trump, usually by 1% less.

The polls aren't made up. they are from a variety of University's survey research labs and independent polling companies. You can question the methodology, but they are all basically getting the same results.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Brian Jones] * 1
    #26414147 -

Ah, the socialist argument. I forgot it's okay to subsidize corporations but allowing your citizens to visit a doctor is anti-American hippie commie bullshit. 'Murica.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Ran-D]
    #26414181 -

How can you guys vote for people of 78 years old into power?

He will not live to see the consequences of his decisions.




Now, outside of that point of view that only i have.
Wouldn't it be dangerous to have a socialist candidate? it will make a lot of people vote republican just to avoid him.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: living_failure] * 1
    #26414249 -

Last time I voted I wrote in Ron Paul. I think that was after Obama's first term. He was old as fuck but I trusted him.

Bernie isn't a socialist.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Ran-D]
    #26414267 -

Ran-D said:
Last time I voted I wrote in Ron Paul. I think that was after Obama's first term. He was old as fuck but I trusted him.

Bernie isn't a socialist.


Here in spanish media, i think i remember something like he autolabeling himself as social democrat (remember that here being socialist is normal).
But i might be wrong.

It doesn't matter if he isn't really socialist, if the voters think he is, it will have a backlash of USA anti-socialism.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Ran-D]
    #26414292 -

Ran-D said:
Last time I voted I wrote in Ron Paul. I think that was after Obama's first term. He was old as fuck but I trusted him.

Bernie isn't a socialist.


Is Ron Paul?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: living_failure]
    #26414294 -

living_failure said:
How can you guys vote for people of 78 years old into power?

He will not live to see the consequences of his decisions.




Now, outside of that point of view that only i have.
Wouldn't it be dangerous to have a socialist candidate? it will make a lot of people vote republican just to avoid him.


Yeah bro the GOP would never call someone a socialist who isn’t one.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26414299 -

The Ecstatic said:
Ran-D said:
Last time I voted I wrote in Ron Paul. I think that was after Obama's first term. He was old as fuck but I trusted him.

Bernie isn't a socialist.


Is Ron Paul?


I think Ron Paul is the opposite of a socialist.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Ran-D] * 1
    #26414305 -

He's a Republican. You can tell by the way his bank account is.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26414308 -

The Ecstatic said:
living_failure said:
How can you guys vote for people of 78 years old into power?

He will not live to see the consequences of his decisions.




Now, outside of that point of view that only i have.
Wouldn't it be dangerous to have a socialist candidate? it will make a lot of people vote republican just to avoid him.


Yeah bro the GOP would never call someone a socialist who isn’t one.


Sorry for the misunderstanding. i think is dangerous for the democrat party if they want to win the elections to have a candidate that the public consider as socialist.

I don't even think that the Comunnist party here is communist at all, just that the people think they are. (same with the two socialists).

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: living_failure]
    #26414317 -

Are you talking about the communist party in Madrid or in the USA? And if it's the one in Madrid, why the fuck are you talking about it in the Sanders thread?


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: living_failure] * 1
    #26414338 -

living_failure said:
The Ecstatic said:
living_failure said:
How can you guys vote for people of 78 years old into power?

He will not live to see the consequences of his decisions.




Now, outside of that point of view that only i have.
Wouldn't it be dangerous to have a socialist candidate? it will make a lot of people vote republican just to avoid him.


Yeah bro the GOP would never call someone a socialist who isn’t one.


Sorry for the misunderstanding. i think is dangerous for the democrat party if they want to win the elections to have a candidate that the public consider as socialist.

I don't even think that the Comunnist party here is communist at all, just that the people think they are. (same with the two socialists).


Yeah the democrats should nominate a centrist like Hillary Clinton who would easily beat Trump.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: christopera] * 1
    #26414339 -

christopera said:
Are you talking about the communist party in Madrid or in the USA? And if it's the one in Madrid, why the fuck are you talking about it in the Sanders thread?


Because someone said that Sanders is not socialist and i just said that it doesn't matter if he is or he is not but what the voters think he is. The same that happens with the parties here, so i named the spanish communist party.
And yes, when people vote to this party or it seems that people will vote to this party there is a strong response voting the opposite (which it was my point with Sanders).

It was kinda implicit, but i can be more explicit if it helps you understand my words.


EDIT to avoid double post:

The Ecstatic said:
living_failure said:
The Ecstatic said:
living_failure said:
How can you guys vote for people of 78 years old into power?

He will not live to see the consequences of his decisions.




Now, outside of that point of view that only i have.
Wouldn't it be dangerous to have a socialist candidate? it will make a lot of people vote republican just to avoid him.


Yeah bro the GOP would never call someone a socialist who isn’t one.


Sorry for the misunderstanding. i think is dangerous for the democrat party if they want to win the elections to have a candidate that the public consider as socialist.

I don't even think that the Comunnist party here is communist at all, just that the people think they are. (same with the two socialists).


Yeah the democrats should nominate a centrist like Hillary Clinton who would easily beat Trump.


The Ecstatic said:
(...)
Yeah the democrats should nominate a centrist like Hillary Clinton who would easily beat Trump.


That is an strawman, i am not saying democrats should choose someone like Hillary, just that Sanders could get a backslash of centrist moving to the right.
You can even choose someone with similar ideas as Sanders, but not someone labeled as socialist.


Edited by living_failure (01/03/20 03:07 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: living_failure]
    #26414341 -

The history of the left in Spain is wildly different than that of the US.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: living_failure]
    #26414347 -

living_failure said:
christopera said:
Are you talking about the communist party in Madrid or in the USA? And if it's the one in Madrid, why the fuck are you talking about it in the Sanders thread?


Because someone said that Sanders is not socialist and i just said that it doesn't matter if he is or he is not but what the voters think he is. The same that happens with the parties here, so i named the spanish communist party.
And yes, when people vote to this party or it seems that people will vote to this party there is a strong response voting the opposite (which it was my point with Sanders).

It was kinda implicit, but i can be more explicit if it helps you understand my words.



Be implicit or as explicit as you like, just do it in another thread as it does not apply here.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | | Last >

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Poll: 20% of White Democrats Vote McCain If Obama Is The Nominee lonestar2004 1,576 16 03/01/08 03:49 AM
by KillerPicklez
* Super Tuesday: Democrats outpolled Reps by 6 million. blackegg 1,368 13 02/29/08 04:04 AM
by fireworks_god
* TRUMP 2024
( 1 2 3 4 ... 2150 2151 )		 XUL 512,035 43,008 11/13/26 11:29 PM
by christopera
* Notice To Incumbent Democrats Up For Reelection In 2014:
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all )		 starfire_xes 5,684 174 11/22/13 09:32 PM
by zappaisgod
* Are Democrats Creeping Into Contention? lonestar2004 1,680 2 06/23/05 12:24 AM
by Ravus
* Social Engineering by Democrats Destroys the World's Financial Markets
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 Phred 8,377 97 10/17/08 03:18 AM
by riceandpeas
* Senate Democrats say their rookies strayed on FISA discombobulate 517 2 08/09/07 06:37 AM
by Seuss
* Democrats Panick Over Obuma's New Power Plant Regulations
( 1 2 3 all )		 Stonehenge 2,575 56 06/16/14 06:18 PM
by Luddite

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
89,939 topic views. 0 members, 55 guests and 11 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.032 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.