Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Original Sensible Seeds Shop: Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds, Bulk Cannabis Seeds, Feminized Cannabis Seeds, High THC Strains

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |  [ show all ]
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #17886705 -

What are the exigent circumstances in these immigration stops? Did a little Mexican jump in your back windows, is there a lady giving birth in the seat, is your bag of weed sitting on the front seat?


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #17886717 -

k00laid said:
Prisoner#1 said:
really? exigent circumstances... as I stated, it covers a lot of gound



exigent circumstances allows them to break down your door.

the door being locked or unlocked has nothing to do with the legality of the entry.




quit trying to obfuscate the argument with this nonsense

k00laid said:
no. the door being locked is entirely unrelated to the legality of entering the home.



Prisoner#1 said:
if the door was unlocked it's not illegal



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #17886776 -

Prisoner#1 said:
if the door was unlocked it's not illegal





this is incorrect.
the door being locked or unlocked is entirely irrelevant to whether or not the entry is legal.


--------------------
AMU - AMU Q & A - MyVideo Teks!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: k00laid]
    #17886784 -

k00laid said:
their job is against the law.



Whenever the word "law" appears in one of your posts, hilarity ensues.

Since when has it been against the law to be a border patrolman/cop/homeland security type?

Edit: I see someone beat me to it, yet I'll leave this post here since you clearly have little idea what is legal and illegal.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Edited by luvdemshrooms (03/01/13 04:48 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #17886790 -

if you would read the thread instead of personally attacking me, you would know i admitted to phrasing it wrong.


--------------------
AMU - AMU Q & A - MyVideo Teks!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: k00laid]
    #17886802 -

You could read my edit.

I attacked nothing yet your lack of knowledge of the law would be an easy target.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #17886816 -

luvdemshrooms said:
I attacked nothing yet your lack of knowledge of the law would be an easy target.



except im totally right.
and pris is totally wrong.


--------------------
AMU - AMU Q & A - MyVideo Teks!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: Herbologist]
    #17886856 -

Herbologist said:
pretty cool that he has the balls to do that. but theyre just trying to do their job... fyi i only watched like the first
minute




fuck that, they are blatantly violating the 4th amendment.


--------------------
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: k00laid]
    #17886866 -

k00laid said:
luvdemshrooms said:
I attacked nothing yet your lack of knowledge of the law would be an easy target.



except im totally right.
and pris is totally wrong.



Of course you are.

Of course.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: jammin]
    #17886902 -

jammin said:
to be more specific about DUI checkpoints, here's the US Supreme Court Case that proved its constitutionality.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Dept._of_State_Police_v._Sitz




that proves that the SCOTUS is corrupt, not that its constitutional.


--------------------
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: Shins]
    #17886904 -

i like you shins :smile: :flower:


--------------------
AMU - AMU Q & A - MyVideo Teks!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #17886905 -

Prisoner#1 said:
koods said:
While sVs is right that a car is not a home, in terms of the expectation of privacy, or reasonableness of searches, opening a car door without consent is pretty fucking analogous to opening a front door to a house.




if the door was unlocked it's not illegal




BS

read the 4th amendment.


--------------------
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: Shins]
    #17886910 -

Prisoner#1 said:
k00laid said:
Prisoner#1 said:
really? exigent circumstances... as I stated, it covers a lot of gound



exigent circumstances allows them to break down your door.

the door being locked or unlocked has nothing to do with the legality of the entry.




quit trying to obfuscate the argument with this nonsense

k00laid said:
no. the door being locked is entirely unrelated to the legality of entering the home.



Prisoner#1 said:
if the door was unlocked it's not illegal





k00laid said:
Prisoner#1 said:
if the door was unlocked it's not illegal





this is incorrect.
the door being locked or unlocked is entirely irrelevant to whether or not the entry is legal.



Shins said:
Prisoner#1 said:
koods said:
While sVs is right that a car is not a home, in terms of the expectation of privacy, or reasonableness of searches, opening a car door without consent is pretty fucking analogous to opening a front door to a house.




if the door was unlocked it's not illegal




BS

read the 4th amendment.




he stopped responding to me.

i guess that means i lost. :hehehe:


--------------------
AMU - AMU Q & A - MyVideo Teks!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: trampis]
    #17886916 -

Fuck off and let the cop do his job. Stoners like this are annoying as fuck.


--------------------
Boobies vagina chicken wings and HYDROCODONE

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #17886922 -

luvdemshrooms said:
Since when has it been against the law to be a border patrolman/cop/homeland security type?




since when does mexico start up to 100 miles inland of the border?

why are border guards operating up to 100 miles inland violating people's 4th amendment?


--------------------
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: ThisIsKitty]
    #17886935 -

ThisIsKitty said:
Fuck off and let the cop do his job. Stoners like this are annoying as fuck.





systematically violating people 4th amendment 100 miles inland from the border all day long every day is not the job of border security.

their job is to enforce the law, not systematically violate it.


ignoramuses like this are destroying america.


--------------------
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: k00laid]
    #17886937 -

k00laid said:
Prisoner#1 said:
if the door was unlocked it's not illegal



this is incorrect.
the door being locked or unlocked is entirely irrelevant to whether or not the entry is legal.




once more "exigent circumstances"

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #17886947 -

the door being unlocked is not an exigent circumstance.


--------------------
AMU - AMU Q & A - MyVideo Teks!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #17886951 -

Prisoner#1 said:
once more "exigent circumstances"





an unlocked door alone does not constitute "exigent circumstances"  nor does it justify violating the 4th amendment.


there is no excuse to this blatant and systematic violation of your constitutional rights.

people should be outraged, not fumbling to make excuses, how unamerican.


--------------------
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Checkpoint refusals. . . [Re: Shins]
    #17886967 -

if you like those kinds of videos, check out this guy's youtube channel

http://www.youtube.com/user/RP4409?feature=chclk

they cover checkpoints a lot and some of those clips in the compilation are from this guy.


--------------------
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |  [ show all ]

Original Sensible Seeds Shop: Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds, Bulk Cannabis Seeds, Feminized Cannabis Seeds, High THC Strains


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Not stopping at a DUI checkpoint
( 1 2 3 all )
Alicedee25 3,701 55 08/22/09 03:04 AM
by Everlong
* Police checkpoints at Wakarusa
( 1 2 all )
blissedout 5,409 30 06/09/06 02:04 AM
by blissedout
* Man refuses to go to Iraq: Poll
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
Banez 8,812 126 01/07/07 10:13 PM
by ExplosiveMango
* Refused - Worms of the Senses trendalM 1,093 8 10/07/04 10:20 PM
by trendal
* Pharmacists refusing to give birth control to women due to morals
( 1 2 3 all )
MOTH 6,277 41 11/27/04 08:56 PM
by d33p
* Refusing a Breathalyzer?
( 1 2 all )
TheFakeSunRa 3,789 21 08/10/06 06:27 PM
by HeadTripVertigo
* Man Refuses To Go to Iraq...
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
TwoGuys 6,773 120 01/04/07 06:06 PM
by Shroomism
* $1000 Per Day Fine And 30 Days In Jail For Refusing The Swine Flu Vaccine
( 1 2 all )
P-O 3,207 38 08/29/09 10:23 AM
by citricacidx

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
3,364 topic views. 1 members, 247 guests and 116 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.036 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 16 queries.