This forum post discusses the legitimacy of workers taking over their own production methods and the differences between national revolutions and imperialist invasions. The author argues that the Soviet Union's gains, despite low production, were due to starting from a disadvantaged position. They reference Trotsky's defense of the USSR against imperialist attacks and his call for overthrowing Stalin's bureaucratic regime. The post emphasizes that while Stalinist bureaucracies exist, they are not the same as bourgeois capitalists and can lead to a new ruling class if capitalism returns. It also addresses the impact of wage cuts and capitalist violence on workers, drawing from recent strikes and lockouts. The author concludes that irreconcilable class interests will continue to fuel class struggle until revolutionary change becomes the only option.

This forum post debates the legitimacy of communist revolutions and the impact of communist regimes. The author argues that communist revolutions often result in dictatorships and totalitarian states, citing historical examples like the Soviet Union, North Vietnam, China, and Afghanistan. They claim that the gains made in these revolutions were minimal compared to the establishment of authoritarian governments. The author also criticizes the concept of a "world revolution," stating that it requires universal consent, which is unlikely given the diverse beliefs of people worldwide. They defend the Soviet Union's rise to superpower status, attributing it to factors like population, resources, and military strength, rather than the economic system. The author dismisses Trotsky's criticisms of the Soviet Union, pointing to instances of dissidence being suppressed. They argue that communism has created a new ruling class with absolute power, contrasting this with the capitalist system, where individuals can earn wealth through effort and entrepreneurship. The post concludes by questioning whether the author will engage with their criticisms of communism, emphasizing the inherent class struggle and inevitability of conflict between the working class and bourgeoisie.

This forum post debates the legitimacy of communist revolutions and their outcomes. The author argues that revolts against the bourgeoisie are justified, contrasting this with historical examples of communist regimes turning into dictatorships. They claim that communist states have resulted in totalitarian rule, with the ruling class exploiting workers. The author also addresses concerns about personal resources, claiming that factories and resources belong to the working class, not the bourgeoisie. They criticize the Soviet Union and other communist regimes for their totalitarianism, lack of workers' democracy, and eventual decline. The author concludes by reiterating their stance on the irreconcilable class interests and the need for revolutionary change.

This forum post argues against communism, emphasizing the legitimacy of workers taking over their methods of production. It counters claims of theft, drawing from the fact that workers built the factories and willingly work under the current system. The author criticizes the idea that all workers "barely feed their families" and points out the excess of food and obesity in America. They argue that a regulated capitalism can have benefits but also inherent inequalities, and that a world revolution would require universal consent, which is unlikely. The post condemns Stalinist regimes as examples of failed communism, citing their totalitarian nature and human rights abuses. It concludes by advocating for economic freedom and personal responsibility, contrasting it with the authoritarianism of communist states.