|
 Revelation
ॐ
Registered: 08/04/01
Posts: 6,135
Loc: heart cave
|
 Debunking Zetatalk 
#680417 - 06/15/02 01:19 PM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I direct your attention to this website:
http://www.skepticalmind.com/zetatalk.html
..which attempts to debunk the zetatalk material. Let's discuss.
--------------------
|
 WildLASER
Infinity In AGrain Of Salt
Registered: 04/01/00
Posts: 870
Last seen: 3 years, 11 months
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Revelation]
#680434 - 06/15/02 01:29 PM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Nancy looks like a fraud to me.
That guy TT tired to debunk her and she basically said "The people of Zetatalk like to believe in it so we do".
Fuck Nancy and her Planet X. She is just trying to make some money with her crazy conspiracy theories.
--------------------
,'~Þ
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Revelation]
#680735 - 06/15/02 04:09 PM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
That chick was on Art Bell's show on thursday.
I tend to be wary of people who are never 'wrong'.
-OoD
|
Swami
Eggshell Walker
Registered: 01/18/00
Posts: 15,413
Loc: In the hen house
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Revelation]
#680809 - 06/15/02 04:56 PM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Well, her name is Nancy Lied(er) - I think that sez it all.
What do you mean "attempts"? I think his take is right on the money.
Why do you feel it appropriate to discuss the views of this woman? Not one of her predictions / stories has been shown to bear any fruit.
--------------------
The proof is in the pudding.
|
Swami
Eggshell Walker
Registered: 01/18/00
Posts: 15,413
Loc: In the hen house
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Swami]
#680833 - 06/15/02 05:05 PM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Now does this quote sound like that of an advanced alien ambassador or that of a hysterical woman on the edge of a breakdown? You tell me.
"Our emissary, Nancy, has NEVER taken psychoactive drugs nor has anyone other than the scum on this Usenet message board ever suggested that be the case. She works a professional job that would put YOURS to shame, has all her life, and is highly regarded by her peers. Since you're into personal questions, Peter, lets address YOUR life, and see if YOU have the guts to respond. How is it that you ask this question, but cannot enter into a discussion about how Newton is a God and the like. Are you an astronomer? You are NOT, nor do you even know the first thing about astronomy. You're a paid lackey, send in here to ask silly and irrelevant questions, so that those who pay you can't be accused of asking them. Prove to us this is NOT the case, Peter, and enter into the Revolution debate, on a daily basis, from now on out as we intend to do. Double dare you, you spineless hireling!"
--------------------
The proof is in the pudding.
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: WildLASER]
#680970 - 06/15/02 06:23 PM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
She is just trying to make some money with her crazy conspiracy theories
Please direct me towards where she is making any money for her crazy theories.
|
Middleman
Registered: 07/11/99
Posts: 8,399
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: ]
#681217 - 06/16/02 12:52 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
i don't think it's about $ as much as DiSinFormation.
WoW, there are so many different flavors of Belief these days...
eye wonder why.
Zetatalk is much like the Dreamspell version of the Mayan calendar;
it is a misrepresentation or juxtaposition of a once valid Metaprogram,
for the sole purpose of distorting the signals and counteracting the efforts,
of the REAL Brotherhood of Light...
~
|
Revelation
ॐ
Registered: 08/04/01
Posts: 6,135
Loc: heart cave
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Swami]
#681225 - 06/16/02 01:04 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Gah..I knew that sentence wasn't swami-proof! Anyway, I was trying to pave the way for a balanced discussion...you'll see that the title of the thread is "debunking zetatalk"...i tried to be as neutral as possible 
Oh how I tried.
--------------------
|
Swami
Eggshell Walker
Registered: 01/18/00
Posts: 15,413
Loc: In the hen house
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Revelation]
#681238 - 06/16/02 01:39 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Sounds like you need a can of "Swami-B-Gone". Just one spray and those pesky skeptics disappear in a flash. Send $9.99 to PO Box 1094, Boulder, CO 80154
--------------------
The proof is in the pudding.
|
Revelation
ॐ
Registered: 08/04/01
Posts: 6,135
Loc: heart cave
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Swami]
#681554 - 06/16/02 07:13 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Now does this quote sound like that of an advanced alien ambassador or that of a hysterical woman on the edge of a breakdown? You tell me.
It sounds a lot like the latter.
--------------------
|
HunabKu
Stranger
Registered: 12/27/01
Posts: 18
Last seen: 21 years, 3 months
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Revelation]
#683165 - 06/17/02 04:33 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Rather than questioning the message of the Zetas, question their method of transmission. Here you have the opportunity to just materialize during a Presidential address or something like that and you choose a woman from Wisconsin with limited influence and even worse people skills? If these Zetas wanted to be taken seriously, why use Nancy as their sole spokesfreak? Either they don't want to clue everybody in (in which case why bother aligning ourselves with them or trusting them?) or ... what?
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: ]
#683359 - 06/17/02 06:56 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
she does have a book out now. but wasn't zeta talk up long before there was even an idea of a book??
shroomism, do you believe zetatalk to be mostly true, all true, mostly bs, ???
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: ]
#683556 - 06/17/02 09:08 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Zetatalk has been around since the early 90s I believe.
I tend to think Zetatalk is mostly true, if not all.
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: HunabKu]
#683569 - 06/17/02 09:14 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Rather than questioning the message of the Zetas, question their method of transmission. Here you have the opportunity to just materialize during a Presidential address or something like that and you choose a woman from Wisconsin with limited influence and even worse people skills? If these Zetas wanted to be taken seriously, why use Nancy as their sole spokesfreak? Either they don't want to clue everybody in (in which case why bother aligning ourselves with them or trusting them?) or ... what?
Here is an excerpt from Zetatalk as to why Nancy was chosen as the spokesperson.
Of course, we and others speak through a number of conduits. Many but not all channels are valid, and some of these on occasion carry our voice. Nancy edits our words but also contributes to the content by suggesting points we have failed to cover. Nancy is unique as to her telepathic communications, though many others, seeing the success of ZetaTalk, have asked for this. It is not so much her body, or her IQ, or her age or location that determined our decision to accept Nancy's offer. She has other qualities, missing in others, and in abundance in Nancy - courage, the ability to stand up to Service-to-Self methods, absolutely, and a track record in this regard that allowed us to trust her with this mission. She has more than satisfied our expectations. Nancy is also unique because she has placed herself at great risk.
|
Middleman
Registered: 07/11/99
Posts: 8,399
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: ]
#683626 - 06/17/02 09:48 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
i can't believe you buy into that stuff, Shroomism.
be very wary of any "channeled" information...
especially Elizabeth Prophet, or any of that imaginative Fiction on Spiritweb...
they are Trying to confuse us!
~
Edited by soundmind (06/17/02 09:51 AM)
|
Swami
Eggshell Walker
Registered: 01/18/00
Posts: 15,413
Loc: In the hen house
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: ]
#683822 - 06/17/02 11:34 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I tend to think Zetatalk is mostly true, if not all.
Except for the parts that are lies, errors, misinterpretations and fiction, I would agree with you.
"She has more than satisfied our expectations. "
She (Nancy) has satisfied our (Nancy's) expectations. Nice pat on the back. But then, I think that Swami is an amazing human being.
--------------------
The proof is in the pudding.
|
Sclorch
Clyster
Registered: 07/12/99
Posts: 4,805
Loc: On the Brink of Madness
|
 Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Swami]
#684698 - 06/17/02 06:10 PM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Swami- I hope you never leave...
--------------------
Note: In desperate need of a cure...
|
shaganoz
researcher
Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 247
Loc: Some cold place
Last seen: 7 years, 18 days
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Sclorch]
#685903 - 06/18/02 10:04 AM (21 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Hm it doesnt matter anyway. We live now, we know what we know, and we learn what we learn from experience, not by listening to others crazy ideas. You cant know until you've experienced and seen, and even then sometimes you cant even know for sure :P
--------------------
-Everything I write is fictional entertainment and should not be taken seriously-
-To email me, remove NOSPAM from my email adress or else I won't get it-
|
Food
---Beast---
Registered: 12/10/01
Posts: 390
Loc: Siberia
Last seen: 17 years, 7 months
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Swami]
#748398 - 07/15/02 01:44 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
"Sounds like you need a can of "Swami-B-Gone". Just one spray and those pesky skeptics disappear in a flash. Send $9.99 to PO Box 1094, Boulder, CO 80154 "
Swami - you are funny !
--------------------
--------mushworld.com-----More info than you can throw a stick at-
|
mr crisper
.
Registered: 07/24/00
Posts: 928
|
Re: Debunking Zetatalk [Re: Food]
#748938 - 07/15/02 05:30 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
no, he is a fraud.
i sent my hard-earned cash off on june 16 and have heard nothing back; worse swami is still here.
he just wants your money.
|
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Red Vein Kratom 
Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder
Edit 
Reply 
1 2 all )
TrueBrode
ladeda
Nirvhead
Atomisk
OrgoneConclusion
