Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy
    #4392302 -

If they have enough suspicion about someone that they can already name a suspect, Mohamed Guerbouzi, then why wasnt this person named before the attack.


--------------------
ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey.

There is such emotion in the distortion.

Edited by 1stimer (07/11/05 12:18 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
    #4392326 -

Yesterday they were "almost certain" the bombers were Britons. Maybe their government is as incompetent as ours.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
    #4392338 -

It usually doesn't take this long to make up a scapegoat... Look at 9/11.


--------------------
:heartpump: { { { ṧ◎ηḯ¢ αʟ¢ℌ℮мƴ } } } :heartpump:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
    #4392356 -

Do you have a link to an article about this?

On another note, it's kind of disturbing that prior to any suspects being named, plenty of people just assumed it was an extremist Muslim group. What a sad state of affairs our society is in for such assumptions to be made. If the Okhlahoma City bombing happened in 2005 instead of 1995, would people have thought the same thing?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: moog]
    #4392382 -

Hey man, whatever the TV tells us.


--------------------
:heartpump: { { { ṧ◎ηḯ¢ αʟ¢ℌ℮мƴ } } } :heartpump:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
    #4393127 -

Because they are being used as scapegoats. Look at 9/11 for instance, 19 hi-jackers named with pictures. Right after the attacks also. Later on numerous hi-jackers that were named by the FBI turned out to be alive and well. How can they blame people with no evidence? Well its the government, and whos gonna say otherwise (other then us).


--------------------
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: moog]
    #4393252 -

Quote:
On another note, it's kind of disturbing that prior to any suspects being named, plenty of people just assumed it was an extremist Muslim group.


That might have had something to do with the fact that an extremist Muslim group claimed credit for the attack, and that it had all the earmarks of a typical Muslim terrorist attack. Of course no one knows for sure yet who did it.

Might have been the IRA. Might have been Jehovah's Witnesses. Might have been animal rights terrorists. Too early to say with certainty.



Phred


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: Phred]
    #4394539 -

I claim responsibility for the creation of the entire world... and since I'm posting this on the internet, you better believe it!


--------------------
:heartpump: { { { ṧ◎ηḯ¢ αʟ¢ℌ℮мƴ } } } :heartpump:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
    #4395047 -

> If they have enough suspicion about someone that they can already name a suspect, Mohamed Guerbouzi, then why wasnt this person named before the attack.

Why do they catch bank robbers after they rob a bank rather than stopping them before they rob the bank... it is much easier to figure out who did something after it has been done than to try and figure out who is going to do something when you have no idea what the something is. This isn't rocket science... in fact, it is so common we have a saying for it... "hindsight is 20/20".


--------------------
Just another spore in the wind.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
    #4395369 -

Quote:
If they have enough suspicion about someone that they can already name a suspect, Mohamed Guerbouzi, then why wasnt this person named before the attack.


So if the cops suspect people at the shroomery of having taken mushrooms in the past they should publicize our names?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: IsaacHunt]
    #4396201 -

If we are a legitimate threat to society and the government knew about our presence.


--------------------
ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey.

There is such emotion in the distortion.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Man linked to London bombings threatens Sweden lonestar2004 735 3 07/22/05 01:34 PM
by Krishna
* Fox News: London Bombings Mastermind is MI6 Asset usefulidiot 412 1 08/02/05 09:25 AM
by moog
* Underground London Bombing 'exercises' echoing Norad's 9/11 hi-jacking 'drills'??? usefulidiot 1,428 16 12/12/11 01:08 PM
by Prisoner#1
* "outrageously flawed", "ridiculous logical fallacies"... Anonymous 628 7 08/21/04 09:52 PM
by SpaceCadet
* London Bombings Prove Iraq War Does Not Deter Terrorism
( 1 2 3 4 all )		 1stimer 6,243 61 10/06/05 03:37 PM
by wilshire
* The suicide bomb squad from Leeds lonestar2004 1,096 11 07/13/05 11:34 AM
by downforpot
* 'Terrorists' used High-Grade Millitary Explosives in London usefulidiot 1,015 9 07/13/05 12:00 PM
by moog
* London: Man shot by armed police on Tube
( 1 2 3 all )		 psilomonkey 6,077 47 08/02/05 11:32 AM
by Ego Death

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
942 topic views. 1 members, 1 guests and 39 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.021 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 14 queries.