|
1stimer
Religion=Rape
Registered: 11/18/01
Posts: 1,280
Loc: Amerika
|
London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy
#4392302 - 07/11/05 12:18 PM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
If they have enough suspicion about someone that they can already name a suspect, Mohamed Guerbouzi, then why wasnt this person named before the attack.
-------------------- ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey. There is such emotion in the distortion.
Edited by 1stimer (07/11/05 12:18 PM)
|
bukkake
Registered: 05/28/05
Posts: 2,764
Loc: Classified
|
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
#4392326 - 07/11/05 12:26 PM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Yesterday they were "almost certain" the bombers were Britons. Maybe their government is as incompetent as ours.
|
Adamist
ℚṲℰϟ✞ЇѺℵ ℛ∃Åʟḯ†У
Registered: 11/23/01
Posts: 10,211
Loc: Bloomington, IN
Last seen: 9 years, 28 days
|
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
#4392338 - 07/11/05 12:30 PM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
It usually doesn't take this long to make up a scapegoat... Look at 9/11.
-------------------- { { { ṧ◎ηḯ¢ αʟ¢ℌ℮мƴ } } }
|
moog
Stranger
Registered: 02/15/05
Posts: 1,296
|
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
#4392356 - 07/11/05 12:35 PM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Do you have a link to an article about this?
On another note, it's kind of disturbing that prior to any suspects being named, plenty of people just assumed it was an extremist Muslim group. What a sad state of affairs our society is in for such assumptions to be made. If the Okhlahoma City bombing happened in 2005 instead of 1995, would people have thought the same thing?
|
Adamist
ℚṲℰϟ✞ЇѺℵ ℛ∃Åʟḯ†У
Registered: 11/23/01
Posts: 10,211
Loc: Bloomington, IN
Last seen: 9 years, 28 days
|
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: moog]
#4392382 - 07/11/05 12:42 PM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Hey man, whatever the TV tells us.
-------------------- { { { ṧ◎ηḯ¢ αʟ¢ℌ℮мƴ } } }
|
J4S0N
human
Registered: 07/29/04
Posts: 284
Last seen: 15 years, 8 months
|
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
#4393127 - 07/11/05 04:14 PM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Because they are being used as scapegoats. Look at 9/11 for instance, 19 hi-jackers named with pictures. Right after the attacks also. Later on numerous hi-jackers that were named by the FBI turned out to be alive and well. How can they blame people with no evidence? Well its the government, and whos gonna say otherwise (other then us).
-------------------- "The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA
|
Phred
Fred's son
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 2 months
|
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: moog]
#4393252 - 07/11/05 05:16 PM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
On another note, it's kind of disturbing that prior to any suspects being named, plenty of people just assumed it was an extremist Muslim group.
That might have had something to do with the fact that an extremist Muslim group claimed credit for the attack, and that it had all the earmarks of a typical Muslim terrorist attack. Of course no one knows for sure yet who did it.
Might have been the IRA. Might have been Jehovah's Witnesses. Might have been animal rights terrorists. Too early to say with certainty.
Phred
--------------------
|
Adamist
ℚṲℰϟ✞ЇѺℵ ℛ∃Åʟḯ†У
Registered: 11/23/01
Posts: 10,211
Loc: Bloomington, IN
Last seen: 9 years, 28 days
|
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: Phred]
#4394539 - 07/12/05 12:29 AM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I claim responsibility for the creation of the entire world... and since I'm posting this on the internet, you better believe it!
-------------------- { { { ṧ◎ηḯ¢ αʟ¢ℌ℮мƴ } } }
|
Seuss
Error: divide byzero
Registered: 04/27/01
Posts: 23,480
Loc: Caribbean
Last seen: 1 month, 18 days
|
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
#4395047 - 07/12/05 05:13 AM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
> If they have enough suspicion about someone that they can already name a suspect, Mohamed Guerbouzi, then why wasnt this person named before the attack.
Why do they catch bank robbers after they rob a bank rather than stopping them before they rob the bank... it is much easier to figure out who did something after it has been done than to try and figure out who is going to do something when you have no idea what the something is. This isn't rocket science... in fact, it is so common we have a saying for it... "hindsight is 20/20".
-------------------- Just another spore in the wind.
|
IsaacHunt
Stranger
Registered: 05/27/05
Posts: 176
|
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: 1stimer]
#4395369 - 07/12/05 09:50 AM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
If they have enough suspicion about someone that they can already name a suspect, Mohamed Guerbouzi, then why wasnt this person named before the attack.
So if the cops suspect people at the shroomery of having taken mushrooms in the past they should publicize our names?
|
1stimer
Religion=Rape
Registered: 11/18/01
Posts: 1,280
Loc: Amerika
|
Re: London Bombing Suspect Logical Fallacy [Re: IsaacHunt]
#4396201 - 07/12/05 02:35 PM (18 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
If we are a legitimate threat to society and the government knew about our presence.
-------------------- ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey. There is such emotion in the distortion.
|
|