an observation..

Home | Community | Message Board

You are not signed in.
New Account

Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post

Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 [ show all ]

OldWoodSpecter
waiting

Registered: 02/01/05
Posts: 4,033
Loc: mountains and lakes
Last seen: 19 years, 10 months

Re: an observation..

[Re: psyillyazul]
#4283290 - 06/11/05 11:51 AM (21 years, 2 months ago)

A star is everythung BUT balance. It seeks balance. Every movement is imbalance seeking balance. Why does wind blow? Because the pressure of air is not in balance.

And every act that is considered immoral, is imbalance seeking balance also. Why does a killer kill? Because he has the urge, urge is imbalance, and seeks balance. Balance in this case is a dead body and a satisfied killer.

A moral act of capturing the killer putting him up against the wall in anger, pushing him in the car with anger, and sentancing him to death, is the SAME imbalance seeking balance. It's motion.

I see no difference between these two acts. Both had a motive, a method, and a culmination that brings satisfaction.
One of them is considered moral, one immoral.

This is an example of a descructive moral and destructive immoral act

Here is an example of constructive moral and constructive immoral act:

A man kills humans and collects their skulls. Later on uses them to make a sculpture. The sculpture is highly appretiated among the likes of him. That is both destructive and constructive

Then another man creates statues out of wood, statues are used on exibitions to collect money for hungry children. But trees were killed to make them. This act is also both constructive and destructive.

One of the acts is immoral, one is moral by stanrdars of morality.
but they are the same, a delicate bargain of death and creation.

The moral difference between the two comes from humans sensatization to one set of acts, and desensatization to another set of acts.
They can be reversed too. A nazi officer probably cared more about his plant at home than some hungry poor old jew that he was beating.

It is all very relative. Every motion in the universe is harming something and benefiting something else. A rock that moves from one place to the other has opened passage for one set of ants, and blocked the passage for another set of ants.

p.s. There is nothing dark about a star swalowing us. It would actually be pretty bright, and orange.

--------------------
I descend upon your earth from the skies
I command your very souls you unbelievers
Bring before me what is mine

Edited by OldWoodSpecter (06/11/05 11:54 AM)

Extras:

Similar Threads	Poster	Views	Replies	Last post
Incest ( 1 2 3 4 all )	Swami	3,422	60	04/05/08 01:50 PM by OrgoneConclusion
The Nonsense of Morality ( 1 2 3 4 all )	Swami	4,084	70	10/25/05 07:54 PM by Deviate
can you prove the existence of absolute, objective morality? ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )	Anonymous	22,739	157	12/21/04 06:31 AM by deafpanda
Question for moral objectivists ( 1 2 all )	silversoul7	4,142	31	06/14/03 10:42 AM by NewToTrippin
Are morals subjective? ( 1 2 all )	Anonymous	6,265	35	04/24/03 05:58 AM by MarkostheGnostic
Kant's Grounding for the metaphysics of Morals	shroominsmurf	1,453	19	05/10/04 01:15 AM by shroominsmurf
are there morals? ( 1 2 all )	CleverName	4,464	33	09/21/02 11:26 AM by Albino_Jesus
Who/what does the disassociated observer observe? Some DXM-induced ponderings...	the_phoenix	687	3	03/07/05 02:48 PM by egghead1