Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | | Last >
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic] * 1
    #26424386 -

*air guitars John Frusciante*


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: mycosis]
    #26424519 -

Somehow have never heard this version :highfive:


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26426407 -


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: JohnRainy]
    #26426442 -

Aren’t you a trump supporter? Your concern trolling is boring as shit get some new material


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26426473 -

He only became a millionaire after the 2016 election though. Someone who lived 657 years (or however old he is) as a middle class American can talk shit about billionaires.

Unrelated: I really liked Bernie’s Colbert interview last night. He sounded like 2016 Bernie, not this new, sleepy Bernie.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26426510 -

Jeez.  You could have said...

'Bernie Sanders worked his whole life and was successful at his career.  He never became a cocaine addict or an alcoholic or got divorced or otherwise wasted his money and his wife also worked a successful career too and he's old now and, yeah, he saved up a few million.  Nothing wrong with that.'

"Owning three houses is nothing compared to having multiple billions worth of wealth.  Its not even the same universe.  If having some money is a bad thing, how many times badder is Trump than Bernie then?"

I ain't no Trump supporter.  I figure everything he says is so stupid that it might not even be required to say a word against him.  He does a better job of it himself.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: JohnRainy] * 3
    #26426546 -

Here’s a fun fact:

The most profitable event of Trump’s life isn’t a casino opening or a real-estate deal. It’s his father’s death.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: JohnRainy]
    #26427127 -

Not worth the effort


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic] * 2
    #26427276 -

The Ecstatic said:
Aren’t you a trump supporter? Your concern trolling is boring as shit get some new material



Got a chuckle reading your post.  You must have gotten ole JR mixed up with someone else.

I'd make a gentleman's bet that 3/4's of JR's posts in this sub have been something negative/critical of trump, trump policy, or in rebuttal of someone's positive trump comment.  And said posts have been prolific as of late.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: relic] * 1
    #26427544 -

You’re right I think I mixed him up with another red avi dude, that’s my bad.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic] * 2
    #26427549 -

CNN wants everyone to know that Bernie leading polls in Iowa means nothing:



--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26427618 -

The Ecstatic said:
CNN wants everyone to know that Bernie leading polls in Iowa means nothing:




if the margin of error is higher than the difference between Sanders and Warren
would that be used as a valid reason to claim no clear leader?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Tantrika] * 1
    #26427918 -

It could, but the heading "NO CLEAR LEADER" has the largest font, and is the first thing one sees. I havent seen many polls with headings like that. Given that Bernie has gotten less coverage/downplayed, its reasonable to assume.


--------------------
“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

Edited by SirTripAlot (01/11/20 01:20 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: mycosis]
    #26427932 -

mycosis said:
*air guitars John Frusciante*





Thanks for that.  Im a huge JF fan and I hadn't heard this one before.  JF is magic.  I don't know how he does it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic] * 1
    #26428067 -

In the last two days I have read stories in the MSM about Trump and Biden going after Bernie. This is great news as it demonstrates that those two and the mainstream has been forced to recognize that Sanders is a real threat to win.

It is becoming increasingly difficult for the media to marginalize Sanders' campaign. Besides the young, and confirmed lefties, Bernie is picking up momentum from the segments that got Trump elected, the large segment of the working class that is disillusioned, and rural voters. The latter is evidenced in his good Iowa numbers. 

If Bernie is the nominee he instantly gets a bunch more support. without making any conscious effort to lump them into one bloc, women will support him against Trump, and that includes black women. Black men favor Biden currently, but if he's out of the way, they still vote Democrat. Hispanics will vote for Bernie. I don't know his policy on new immigration (certainly less radical than AOC's abolishing ICE), but I don't believe Bernie will deport anyone who is here now. Bernie will have the most rational policies with Israel of any president in history, and it wont cost him many Jewish votes, because they weren't buying what Trump was selling.

With each passing week it looks more and more like Bernie Sanders will be the next President.
I don't know how much he can accomplish, but I think medicine, higher taxes on the rich, staying out of unnecessary foreign wars and financial regulation can all be pushed through.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Brian Jones]
    #26428097 -

Brian Jones said:
In the last two days I have read stories in the MSM about Trump and Biden going after Bernie. This is great news as it demonstrates that those two and the mainstream has been forced to recognize that Sanders is a real threat to win.

It is becoming increasingly difficult for the media to marginalize Sanders' campaign. Besides the young, and confirmed lefties, Bernie is picking up momentum from the segments that got Trump elected, the large segment of the working class that is disillusioned, and rural voters. The latter is evidenced in his good Iowa numbers. 

If Bernie is the nominee he instantly gets a bunch more support. without making any conscious effort to lump them into one bloc, women will support him against Trump, and that includes black women. Black men favor Biden currently, but if he's out of the way, they still vote Democrat. Hispanics will vote for Bernie. I don't know his policy on new immigration (certainly less radical than AOC's abolishing ICE), but I don't believe Bernie will deport anyone who is here now. Bernie will have the most rational policies with Israel of any president in history, and it wont cost him many Jewish votes, because they weren't buying what Trump was selling.

With each passing week it looks more and more like Bernie Sanders will be the next President.
I don't know how much he can accomplish, but I think medicine, higher taxes on the rich, staying out of unnecessary foreign wars and financial regulation can all be pushed through.


Congress will not approve any of those issues, not gonna happen. 

Also, I think Trump might do even better with women now. I wouldn't underestimate that possibility.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: The Ecstatic]
    #26428101 -

The Ecstatic said:
CNN wants everyone to know that Bernie leading polls in Iowa means nothing


CNBC calls it a "logjam" at the top, but emphasizes that "Biden has a significant edge in national polls and in surveys of Nevada, while he has a massive lead in South Carolina".  Nevermind the states where Bernie is leading (New Mexico, Oregon, Colorado, Iowa).


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Edited by Falcon91Wolvrn03 (01/11/20 03:32 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: qman] * 1
    #26428141 -

qman said:
Brian Jones said:
I don't know how much he can accomplish, but I think medicine, higher taxes on the rich, staying out of unnecessary foreign wars and financial regulation can all be pushed through.


Congress will not approve any of those issues, not gonna happen.


While Congress might not be in favor of those things right now because most are bought by the rich, I wouldn't underestimate the power of Bernie winning and others trying to keep their seats...


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: qman] * 1
    #26428145 -

qman said:
Brian Jones said:
In the last two days I have read stories in the MSM about Trump and Biden going after Bernie. This is great news as it demonstrates that those two and the mainstream has been forced to recognize that Sanders is a real threat to win.

It is becoming increasingly difficult for the media to marginalize Sanders' campaign. Besides the young, and confirmed lefties, Bernie is picking up momentum from the segments that got Trump elected, the large segment of the working class that is disillusioned, and rural voters. The latter is evidenced in his good Iowa numbers. 

If Bernie is the nominee he instantly gets a bunch more support. without making any conscious effort to lump them into one bloc, women will support him against Trump, and that includes black women. Black men favor Biden currently, but if he's out of the way, they still vote Democrat. Hispanics will vote for Bernie. I don't know his policy on new immigration (certainly less radical than AOC's abolishing ICE), but I don't believe Bernie will deport anyone who is here now. Bernie will have the most rational policies with Israel of any president in history, and it wont cost him many Jewish votes, because they weren't buying what Trump was selling.

With each passing week it looks more and more like Bernie Sanders will be the next President.
I don't know how much he can accomplish, but I think medicine, higher taxes on the rich, staying out of unnecessary foreign wars and financial regulation can all be pushed through.


Congress will not approve any of those issues, not gonna happen. 

Also, I think Trump might do even better with women now. I wouldn't underestimate that possibility.


I think a Sanders victory would provide a different congress, but you might be right.

I am always curious why you think the elites are an unstoppable force in repelling economic changes that would benefit most, yet you believe that the elites who benefit greatly from illegal immigration could be stopped on that issue.

At any rate I would be glad to take a friendly small wager that Trump doesn't do better with women this time. Actually I don't know how it could be verified. No one really knows how someone voted. We could use some agreed on polling results.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: SirTripAlot]
    #26428164 -

SirTripAlot said:
It could, but the heading "NO CLEAR LEADER" has the largest font, and is the first thing one sees. I havent seen many polls with headings like that.


And it’s a totally accurate headline. There is no clear leader. I’m gonna vote for sanders but Jesus Christ his supporters are snowflakes


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | | Last >

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Poll: 20% of White Democrats Vote McCain If Obama Is The Nominee lonestar2004 1,576 16 03/01/08 03:49 AM
by KillerPicklez
* Super Tuesday: Democrats outpolled Reps by 6 million. blackegg 1,363 13 02/29/08 04:04 AM
by fireworks_god
* TRUMP 2024
( 1 2 3 4 ... 2133 2134 )		 XUL 504,329 42,671 10/14/26 09:31 PM
by Psicomb
* Notice To Incumbent Democrats Up For Reelection In 2014:
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all )		 starfire_xes 5,518 174 11/22/13 09:32 PM
by zappaisgod
* Are Democrats Creeping Into Contention? lonestar2004 1,679 2 06/23/05 12:24 AM
by Ravus
* Social Engineering by Democrats Destroys the World's Financial Markets
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 Phred 8,369 97 10/17/08 03:18 AM
by riceandpeas
* Senate Democrats say their rookies strayed on FISA discombobulate 517 2 08/09/07 06:37 AM
by Seuss
* Democrats Panick Over Obuma's New Power Plant Regulations
( 1 2 3 all )		 Stonehenge 2,573 56 06/16/14 06:18 PM
by Luddite

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
89,711 topic views. 1 members, 30 guests and 12 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.038 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.