Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: < First | | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | | Last >
Re: Sanders [Re: koods] * 2
    #26436584 -

koods said:
“So shrill”
“V-card”

The Bernie Bros are back!

I just can’t support Sanders because of the toxicity of his supporters. Voting warren. Four years under a cult of personality is enough.


I was being facetious, clearly (Maybe not so clearly as I thought).

Also, your reasoning for not voting for Bernie is fucking stupid, but I'm not trying to steal your vote away from that piece of shit candidate. You're too far gone.


--------------------
"It is no measure of good health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society," - Jiddu Krishnamurti
FARTS
"No my dog won't bite you, tho it had the right to. You ought to give him credit, cuz he knows I woulda let him" - Modest Mouse (And Wooof!)
Every one of you should see this video.
"Facts are chiels that winna ding, and downa be disputed" - Robert Burns


Edited by Bigbadwooof (01/16/20 10:58 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Bigbadwooof]
    #26436593 -

Great interview with Killer Mike on NPR today. Somebody should post it.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: christopera] * 3
    #26436619 -

"NYTimes Blatantly Lying About Bernie/Warren Debate"


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: qman] * 1
    #26436631 -

It's amazing there are still people out there who trust CNN and the NYT.  Obvious fake news once again.

The people here who like make believe (we know who they are) seem to like these sources.  :shake:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26436653 -

You trust RTs every fart and sigh lmao


--------------------
¿Check out some art m8?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26436658 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
It's amazing there are still people out there who trust CNN and the NYT.  Obvious fake news once again.

The people here who like make believe (we know who they are) seem to like these sources.  :shake:



We know that there are variable levels of truthiness. Just the other day you argued that an article that we agreed is false still makes worthy points. The same should apply to CNN and NYT I’d imagine.


--------------------
Enjoy the process of your search without succumbing to the pressure of the result.

A Dorito is pizza, change my mind.

I’m sorry it had to be me.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: twighead]
    #26436662 -

What does RT have to do with this?

Regardless, why don't you be the first to post a fake news story from RT?


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: christopera]
    #26436669 -

christopera said:
We know that there are variable levels of truthiness. Just the other day you argued that an article that we agreed is false still makes worthy points. The same should apply to CNN and NYT I’d imagine.


I don't remember which story that was.

Regardless, of course CNN and NYT times make worthy points.  I just wish they were closer to 100% reliable.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 2
    #26436673 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
What does RT have to do with this?

Regardless, why don't you be the first to post a fake news story from RT?


Hasn't this been done before, possibly even multiple times?

Seem to recall Enlil calling attention to a fake news story they did, which you then stated was not recent enough to count

then when the fake news story of NATO exercises "near" the border was brought up
you seemed to take the position that them publishing fake news is okay because there is similiar fake news on the other side

:shrug:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Tantrika] * 2
    #26436701 -

Tantrika said:
Seem to recall Enlil calling attention to a fake news story they did, which you then stated was not recent enough to count

then when the fake news story of NATO exercises "near" the border was brought up
you seemed to take the position that them publishing fake news is okay because there is similiar fake news on the other side

:shrug:


Enlil mentioned a story that was well over 5 years old that questioned the official 9/11 narrative, before anyone ever heard of RT, and before they took the story down. So the challenge was then to find a single lie in the last five years from RT.com, which no one could do.

Enlil then brought up a recent RT story saying NATO was conducting exercises in Norway near the Russian border.  Norway touches Russia, and the word "near" is obviously subjective, so it was ruled not a lie because the US has called the entire Western Hemisphere "near" to US borders.

Why don't you be the first to post a fake news story from RT?


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Tantrika] * 1
    #26436704 -

This has to help Sanders in the important state of Wisconsin.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rep-mark-pocan-announces-hes-endorsing-bernie-sanders-in-wisconsin-primary/ar-BBZ1cWY?ocid=spartandhp

Liberal representative Mark Pocan (Madison District/University of Wisconsin) endorsed no one in 2016 and he's coming out strong for Bernie this year.

Let's see the momentum snowball.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03] * 1
    #26436706 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Tantrika said:
Seem to recall Enlil calling attention to a fake news story they did, which you then stated was not recent enough to count

then when the fake news story of NATO exercises "near" the border was brought up
you seemed to take the position that them publishing fake news is okay because there is similiar fake news on the other side

:shrug:


Enlil mentioned a story that was well over 5 years old that questioned the official 9/11 narrative, before anyone ever heard of RT, and before they took the story down. So the challenge was then to find a single lie in the last five years from RT.com, which no one could do.

Enlil also brought up a recent story saying NATO was conducting exercises in Norway near the Russian border.  Norway touches Russia, and the word "close" is obviously subjective, so it was ruled not a lie because the US has called the entire Western Hemisphere "close" to US borders.


Seem to recall stating only a week or two back that you would try to utilize persuading a jury of one
as a justification for RT posting fake news
and now you are just doubling down that subjective fake news on one side justifies fake news on the other side

honestly, this small response chain makes me question the validity of all the Pro-Russian information you have been posting over the years
fortunately for you, am too lazy to go digging into your preferred news source, so you will reply to my post with a narrative about how forum readers can therefor trust your input, because you took a brief vacation years ago

:shrug:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Tantrika]
    #26436709 -

I think he went there a couple times.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Brian Jones]
    #26436712 -

Brian Jones said:
I think he went there a couple times.


and I know people who visited Tibet multiple times since the 00s
as well as Tibetan refugees who fled the country and raised their family outside of the borders

which do you think support the Chinese narrative and which do you think support the Tibetan narrative?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26436716 -

RT was claiming within days of the Fukushima accident that Chernobyl was no longer the worst nuclear distater. That is such bullshit. The amount and type of radiation release was much worse in Chernobyl. The fucking core exploded and was left open exposed for weeks. The death toll in Chernobyl was orders of magnitude worse.

RT engages in desperate whataboutism when it comes to nuclear power plants. When we had an earthquake here in DC, this was their lead:

“DC earthquake turns off two nuclear reactors” Scare mongering. It is completely normal for reactors to be taken offline after a large earthquake.


They seem pretty salty that a 5.9 mag earthquake in the capital city of the United States - large enough to shut down the federal government - took attention away from whatever was happening in Libya.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Edited by koods (01/16/20 12:14 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Tantrika]
    #26436723 -

Look, if you think NATO exercises in Norway aren't "near" Russia, but Russian exercises in Venezuela are near the US, then you're free to feel that way.  Not everyone would agree on something that subjective.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26436729 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Look, if you think NATO exercises in Norway aren't "near" Russia, but Russian exercises in Venezuela are near the US, then you're free to feel that way.


Do not feel that way, could you point to my post stating such so it could be corrected for whatever grammatical error gave that impression?

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Not everyone would agree on something that subjective.


as my position on the matter appears to demonstrate
:trippinbawelz:

Tantrika said:
...
then when the fake news story of NATO exercises "near" the border was brought up
you seemed to take the position that them publishing fake news is okay because there is similiar fake news on the other side

:shrug:


even in this sub-discussion in this thread, referred to such claims as being fake news

if it is in another thread, would genuinely appreciate a link

:shrug:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Falcon91Wolvrn03]
    #26436737 -

Falcon91Wolvrn03 said:
Look, if you think NATO exercises in Norway aren't "near" Russia, but Russian exercises in Venezuela are near the US, then you're free to feel that way.  Not everyone would agree on something that subjective.


God damn Norway how dare they put their country right next to Russia.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: koods] * 1
    #26436739 -

The Fukushima story was over five years old and it was based on western media stories:

Why the Fukushima disaster is worse than Chernobyl
Move Over Chernobyl, Fukushima is Now Officially the Worst Nuclear Power Disaster in History

You might not be interested in a story about earthquakes, but that doesn't make it fake news.


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Sanders [Re: Tantrika] * 2
    #26436744 -

Thanks for clarifying you thought "near" was fake news in both stories.

Again, that's highly subjective when it comes to military exercises.  :shrug:


--------------------
I am in a minority on the shroomery, as I frequently defend the opposing side when they have a point about something or when my side make believes something about them.  I also attack my side if I think they're wrong.  People here get very confused by that and think it means I prefer the other side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < First | | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | | Last >

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Poll: 20% of White Democrats Vote McCain If Obama Is The Nominee lonestar2004 1,555 16 03/01/08 01:49 AM
by KillerPicklez
* Super Tuesday: Democrats outpolled Reps by 6 million. blackegg 1,343 13 02/29/08 02:04 AM
by fireworks_god
* TRUMP 2024
( 1 2 3 4 ... 2060 2061 )		 XUL 461,641 41,203 08/07/26 10:44 AM
by pugster
* Notice To Incumbent Democrats Up For Reelection In 2014:
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all )		 starfire_xes 5,290 174 11/22/13 07:32 PM
by zappaisgod
* Are Democrats Creeping Into Contention? lonestar2004 1,674 2 06/22/05 10:24 PM
by Ravus
* Social Engineering by Democrats Destroys the World's Financial Markets
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 Phred 8,267 97 10/17/08 01:18 AM
by riceandpeas
* Senate Democrats say their rookies strayed on FISA discombobulate 513 2 08/09/07 04:37 AM
by Seuss
* Democrats Panick Over Obuma's New Power Plant Regulations
( 1 2 3 all )		 Stonehenge 2,548 56 06/16/14 04:18 PM
by Luddite

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
86,330 topic views. 1 members, 183 guests and 8 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.048 seconds spending 0.011 seconds on 17 queries.