Anonymous #21 said: just for clarification.
If you all had the basic motivation to use the search engine here or on the DEA homepage, you would find three things to be true about JWH.
1. Though they are aware of the fact that it is an effective CB1/CB2 agonist, it is specifically not scheduled. This is because
2. It is not derived in any way from cannabis and is not THC, it does not come under the 1970 Controlled Substances Act, and
3. It is not structurally similar in any way to the THC molecule, being closer to the tryptamines, since it has an indole ring, it does not come under the Analog Drug Act either.
It is on their drugs and substances of concern list, just like nitrous and salvia, but it is NOT illegal, scheduled or "in a gray area".
Before you add to the disinformation and BS out here, and waste ppl's time by forcing them to unlearn bad information that you put out, invest some tiny amount of time researching the facts.
It's not even that hard; please don't spread hearsay, guesses, and street urban legends as fact. It wastes space in my brain if I am unlucky enough to believe it.
stfu nerd
|