ChiefGreenLeaf said:

really? I'm honored. really though let's stop using server space on nothing.

---

beatyou said:

Lol, that is your proof? A random bill that didn't even pass through the house? Your 'proof' was never even signed into law, and bills can be written by ANYONE. That bill in particular is so weak it was introduced for review and killed the same day. This is a completely insignificant document, thanks for playing though! Maybe if you actually knew how to critically think and use your brain/read you would know this.

Like I already said, this is one of the most ridiculous conspiracy theories out there and it is hilarious you uneducated simple minded mother fuckers buy into any youtube vid you see online with no research or work done on your part.

Just cause you don't understand clouds & the atmosphere doesn't mean the govt is out to get you.

Post some more 'gotcha' docs lol

---

what do I say? I understand atmosphere about as much as the next guy. I see two planes flying side by side. one leaves a little trail, disperses in 3-4 seconds. the other plane leaves a trail that doesn't disappear, it just spreads into a big hazy cloud.

I just don't know wtf to say to you people. that's a government document that mentions chemtrails. it is obvious that you have conflicting beliefs and this makes you angry, is that so? I don't understand why you get all "you need to get a brain you need to critically analyze, blah blah"
wtf?

"uneducated, simple minded"
wtf? did you even watch the video I posted or do you already know that it's just "paranoid propaganda"? it's the people like you that keep this whole operation afloat. you try and make people feel dumb for investigating a legitimate concern.

since I'm just so lost, why don't you tell me what to research huh? if documentaries aren't good enough what is?

ur gonna get ur shit handed to ya. deep down I know that one day our grandchildren will be learning about this time period in school and compare it to nazi germany. all the people like this will probably feel like the biggest fucking retards
maybe you'll get a clue. idk

I mean come on...
does anyone else on here not find that strange that chemtrails are mentioned in a bill? So our elected officials are "chemtrail crazies" too? you don't see them writing bills about unicorn breeding programs, if that were so then i would understand.

could you please explain this to me without attacking? can you point me in the right direction? links? sources? if you know better then me, then please share your infinite wisdom. can you explain what I see in the sky? can you please debunk the documentary I posted? if you can't or refuse to because "it's just dumb" then I will be forced to accept the fact u have no clue and I was right all along.

but really, can you do this for me? I want to see where my judgment has been clouded.

wowitch17 said:

i was really fucked on shrums one time and believed in chemtrails for about an hour. Anyone that believes in this shit needs a reality check, as in, you live in a fantasy world.

laying off the psychedelics would probably be a good idea man. if you already believe in chemtrails then a drug induced psychotic break couldnt be far off..

---

ChiefGreenLeaf said:

since I'm just so lost, why don't you tell me what to research huh? if documentaries aren't good enough what is?


but really, can you do this for me? I want to see where my judgment has been clouded.

---

johnm214 said:

ChiefGreenLeaf said:

guys...
please don't be a victim to propaganda
you have a brain
just find out for yourself
that's what the internet is for
empower yourself

---

Any chance of empowring myself with some info disclosing the data, methodology, analysis methods, and conclusions with support for them?


That seems to be the problem- lost of conclusory statements with random pictures and no actual information one could rely on.


If those guys want to be taken seriously they should spend less time just putting videos on youtube looking at the sky and more time providing the above.  Maybe they can't cuz the conclusions they want you to draw cannot be supported with the data they claim to have?

---