It depends on what your style is, or really your basic disposition.
My mania for the last few months has been for the late John Coltrane.
Anything after A love supreme, or anything post 1965. Not many people realize or rather would not wish to acknowledge this, but John Coltrane was experimenting with acid in the last years of his life, and in my mind its no coincidence that his music took the turn that it did.
The repetitive quality you are referring to, the structure of the songs themselves, is worth elaborating on for Coltrane. It isn't necessary for him to have many songs to please me, because one take of a song is going to be completely different than another. Also, I can even listen to the same take many times without it getting old at all, because there is so much depth, so much over my head, or underlying my attention. Really, in the end the structure is barely relevant; especially in his later work, as he would completely deconstruct this to a realm that could only be described as pure impulse... Then he might subtly bring it back.
Its the creative and destructive energy itself that gets me. Coltrane was so far beyond "self expression"; he was simply creative. There is a focus of "character" of course, but it is always found in such an overwhelming flux. The energy builds a particular character like a beautifully fluent language, and blows it away, where it is more like he is speaking in tongues.
So the repetitive quality; the beat, the character, the song, the identitity; this is also what I am looking for, but the greatest aspect is the bare energetic quality.
I know that not so many people listen to Coltrane around here, but I think if people around here gave him the proper chance, they would find that he really fits a psychedelic disposition. This may sound like a great leap, but I find that this particular energetic quality is very similar to animal collective's abstractions (while also obviously different) a group I know that many people of these forums listen to. So if anyone listens to animal collective and John Coltrane, I would be curious if anyone else sees this connection.
I am glad you made this post Zannenagra, and I hope my digressions are harmonious to your original post. Ive wanted to share my recent discovery in the music forum, but its really the philosophical and meditative qualities that I am so intrigued to discuss. Plus, nobody would ever check out such a common name, and I would feel like it is necessary to somehow "hype" him. I think if you really get into it, the mania is just energy, and this has nothing to do with being a fan, or fanaticism, though they often come together. For Coltrane it was an exploration, and sharing his path in a sincere way.
There is alot of music that seems nihilistic to me, where I get a general destructive feeling; but with Coltrane, for some reason his creative and destructive poweress I experience differently. I don't know exactly how, its a feeling.
Quote: I asked John Coltrane to what extent this album was an extension of A Love Supreme. Both albums obviously focus on Coltrane's religious concerns, I use the word "religious" not in any sectarian sense, but rather in the sense that Coltrane's persistent searching in music is simultaneously a searching for meaning in the world and for his place in the world.
"Once you become aware of this force for unity in life," said Coltrane, "you can't ever forget it. It becomes part of everything you do. In that respect, this is an extension of A Love Supreme since my conception of that force keeps changing shape. My goal in meditating on this through music, however, remains the same. And that is to uplift people, as much as I can. To inspire them to realize more and more of their capacities for living meaningful lives. Because there certainly is meaning to life."
Other than this comment, Coltrane prefers not to be specific about the various sections of the album. He expects that each listener will react in different ways to what he hears. And Coltrane adds that it doesn't matter what particular religion - if any - a listener professes because "I believe in all religions." --------------------------------
[Q]...do you feel that you want [your audience] to understand other things than what you're doing musically, and that you have some responsibility for it? ...Do you make any attempt, or do you feel that you should make any attempt, to educate your audience in ways that aren't strictly musical?
[Coltrane] Sure, I feel this, and this is one of the things I am concerned about now. I just don't know how to go about this. I want to find out just how to do it. I think it's going to have to be very subtle; you can ram philosophies down anybody's throat, and the music is enough. That's philosophy. I think the best thing I can do at this time is to try to get myself in shape and know myself. I believe that will do it, if I really can get to myself and be just as I feel I should be and play it. And I think they'll get it...
Edited by daytripper23 (03/21/09 07:02 PM)
|