Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |  [ show all ]
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: flip3084]
    #9350656 -

flip3084 said:
The original topic was evolution. The above state thickening of the skin, hair growth, and fatty content, is an example of evolution, neither random, nor pre-set, but merely a reaction. And enviornmental changes before human involvement were rarely random, and held much order. Therefore I am finding this topic quite paradoxal. Let's talk about an example of genetic mutations.. In England, there are a large number of people with longer noses. Started as a mutation stimulated by prolonged inbreeding of the royal families, but now hereditary..



again some confusion about cause and effect and a healthy measure of speculation.
long noses are not mutations genetically stimulated by inbreeding.
long noses appeared much earlier in recorded history.
Roman coins bear the stamp of this.

veritas may have alluded to the fact that most mutations are actually fatal, but some mutations are adaptively helpful (by pure chance) and these may contribute to altering the members of a population faced by selective pressures.

the cause of those mutations can be worked back (speculatively) to cosmic radiation (very random but very frequent adn still prevailing) chemical toxins (much less usual in teh past but more common now) and genetic practice (the failure of some chromosomes to operate well (not a true mutation) when homologously formed - from inbreeding)


--------------------
:brainfart: _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: redgreenvines]
    #9350705 -

Quote:
veritas may have alluded to the fact that most mutations are actually fatal, but some mutations are adaptively helpful (by pure chance) and these may contribute to altering the members of a population faced by selective pressures.



Indeed.  Let's not forget the neutral mutations, which are still quite heritable, and which may become helpful or fatal under particular environmental demands.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Veritas]
    #9350720 -

I am still waiting for the male-pattern baldness gene to become helpful.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Veritas]
    #9350761 -

Veritas said:
Quote:
veritas may have alluded to the fact that most mutations are actually fatal, but some mutations are adaptively helpful (by pure chance) and these may contribute to altering the members of a population faced by selective pressures.



Indeed.  Let's not forget the neutral mutations, which are still quite heritable, and which may become helpful or fatal under particular environmental demands.



neutral mutations are non-fatal
I have no numbers on this but it is a small percentage of all genetic mutations that are non-fatal.
genetic mutations are heritable mutations (pre-zygotic) as opposed to the mutations that occur in non-germ tissues which can be non-fatal or cancerous - disease forming, and these are non-heritable post zygotic mutations.

(i find it hard to write a sentence that encapsulates every word combination - so thanks for clarifying this important issue.)


--------------------
:brainfart: _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Veritas]
    #9350764 -

Quote:
Epigenetics describes the manner in which genetic expression is regulated.  It has nothing to do with "Experiences, memories, ideas, etc."  What is your point?


 

My point is though you stated this:

Quote:
If the change is not heritable, then it has nothing to do with biological evolution.



The truth is that biological evolution is certainly influenced by changes in the organism that do not directly involve heredity. "[To] be epigenetic, something must 1) be heritable and 2) not be attributable to DNA sequence."

I used memory as an example because it is juxtaposed between being an entirely psychological function and exerting measurable changes on the environment. Alterations to phenotypic expression like brain structure can be altered within the individual's lifetime, via synaptic formation, neuroplasticity, lesioning, etc. which positively impact survival behavior. Thus ideas, arising from cortical activity that structurally resembles the past, simultaneously creates and impacts the future through interactions with the organism and the environment.

I guess we could list some Rupert Sheldrake and morphogenetic fields, but that would get a bit superstitious.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: OrgoneConclusion]
    #9350767 -

OrgoneConclusion said:
I am still waiting for the male-pattern baldness gene to become helpful.



it is very helpful to the hair club for men
- great opportunity - wish I thought of it.


--------------------
:brainfart: _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Arden]
    #9350803 -

Quote:
The truth is that biological evolution is certainly influenced by changes in the organism that do not directly involve heredity. "[To] be epigenetic, something must 1) be heritable and 2) not be attributable to DNA sequence."




If a trait is heritable, whether through epigenetics or DNA sequence changes, then it is part of biological evolution.  If it is NOT heritable, then it is not part of biological evolution.

Alterations to the neural network caused by ideas are NOT heritable, and thus NOT part of biological evolution. 

From my linked article:

Quote:
In biology, evolution is change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms from one generation to the next.



Perhaps you are referring to progress, which can certainly improve survival & reproduction, but which is not heritable.  If we must learn something, then it is part of progress & not evolution.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Arden]
    #9350866 -

Arden said:
Quote:
Epigenetics describes the manner in which genetic expression is regulated.  It has nothing to do with "Experiences, memories, ideas, etc."  What is your point?


 

My point is though you stated this:

Quote:
If the change is not heritable, then it has nothing to do with biological evolution.



The truth is that biological evolution is certainly influenced by changes in the organism that do not directly involve heredity. "[To] be epigenetic, something must 1) be heritable and 2) not be attributable to DNA sequence."

...



I really can't handle that kind of TRUTH
(anything with McKenna in it is not going to fly as evolutionary science)

if it is evolutionary, and if it is not genetic, then it is among the environmental selective conditions.
THINKING and MEMES can be real environmental evolutionary selective conditions, but we won't know it unless we witness something like racial cleansing, or an effective eugenics program that eliminates a trait in favor of another.

there is a vicious aspect to evolution such that the form of creatures are changed. to do this some traits are eradicated. all members with the trait have to be neutered or killed prior to reproductive activity.

at our stage in evolution we are acquiring mutative traits but we are not evolving.  to evolve or change form, the trail we leave through time will necessarily include some forms being discontinued.


--------------------
:brainfart: _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: flip3084]
    #9350883 -

flip3084 said:
Evolution is not random, nor is it pre ordianed. It is a reponse to enviormental changes. Which is far from random. You are an intelligent person, I can tell. But that was far from a thought out proclimation.



flip3084 said:
So, colder weather, does not promote, thicking of the skin, more hair, and a more concetrated fatty content?? I think you are proclaiming something that you can't prove. Animals, adapt to there enviornmet. And when it changes, overtime, the either change to survive in the new enviorment, or perish.. Tried and proven.



You are confusing mutations, natural selection and evolution.  Each have very different and specific meaning, which can be east to do.  I think veritas already sorted you out, so Ill refrain.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Veritas]
    #9350902 -

Quote:
The truth is that biological evolution is certainly influenced by changes in the organism that do not directly involve heredity.



Quote:
Alterations to the neural network caused by ideas are NOT heritable, and thus NOT part of biological evolution.



Everything is part of biological evolution. This realization is becoming the whole point of modern science and the latent discovery of philosophy--everything is indirectly connected and influenced in some way by everything else. It can be as practical as systems theory, or as new-age and superfluous as the "butterfly effect". From Edward O. Wilson's consilience, to Thich Nhat Hanh's interbeing, to the Gaia hypothesis, there are many different ways to understand it, and many different ways to classify biology, but the interactive push of events seems undeniable to me.

This typifies yet another flaw of modern science which tries to isolate and particulate every kind of phenomena. This is beneficial because it aids in understanding and defining the specifics. But when it comes to elaborating complex ideas like cognition and evolution, I think it becomes a limitation and falls short of explaining the whole picture.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: redgreenvines]
    #9350910 -

Quote:
all members with the trait have to be neutered or killed prior to reproductive activity.



Or rendered less attractive to the opposite sex.  Sexual selection is quite important, though perhaps not so influential as death or infertility.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Arden]
    #9350924 -

Quote:
(anything with McKenna in it is not going to fly as evolutionary science)



Argumentum ad hominem.

Stick to the content please. I included his name to credit an idea, not to summon his reputation.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Arden]
    #9350942 -

Changing the definition of "evolution" to include "everything" is overstepping.  When we are describing a specific aspect of biology, it makes sense to utilize a term which actually defines that aspect.  If you want to discuss human progress, then you can certainly include "everything" under that broad & non-scientific umbrella.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Veritas]
    #9351019 -

progress is also a bit of a leap
trajectory is more telling
and it is a wiggly route to be sure.


aint i a woim.


--------------------
:brainfart: _ :finger:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: redgreenvines]
    #9351025 -

1.-*      To transubstantiate things/freedom and to create out of nothing. Wanting the appetite for purity and for the absolute.
 
    2.- Essence eternally seen; properties of creative knowledge. I rest on words like pure and very secret nihilation. Evil in decrees and permissions…formative.


--------------------
Wave.
'And for this reason repentance (metanoia) is an elevating means. For he who feels impatience with the circunstances in which he finds himself, devises means of escape.
  Now the chief thing in purification is the will. For then both deeds and words lend a helping hand. But, when the will is absent, the whole purificatory discipline of initiation is...'

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: redgreenvines]
    #9351029 -

Yes, I would not typify all aspects of human society as "progress" by any stretch of the imagination, yet this is clearly a more-subjective term than "evolution."  One could claim that everything is progress, and garnish it with an "IMO" to seal the deal. :grin:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Veritas]
    #9355847 -

I would say evolution is completely blind. Whatever direction we may have, it is fair to say that no creature can last for an infinite amount of time. Life is simply trying to exist wherever it can.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: MindGorilla]
    #9356732 -

The whole of science is based on the standard assumption that there are underlying laws governing the universe. Meaning, for every effect, there is a cause. Chance is nothing but a law undiscovered. But then, for some reason, suddenly, science changes his mind and goes, oh wait, indeed, everything in the universe is governed by underlying laws, EXCEPT evolution. Yes, evolution is the result of random mutation. There is no underlying cause. No. Random is the answer.

Mutations being random goes against everything science stands for. How can anyone accept that as a valid explanation?

Science is the study that shows us nothing is random. But still people claim science has proven that mutations are random. What the hell?

Quote:
Microbiologist James A. Shapiro of the University of Chicago has done extensive research on this very question and has published a number of papers confirming that yes, there is an adaptation mechanism in DNA that is marvelously sophisticated. Mr. Shapiro has discovered that a protozoa, subjected to extreme environmental stress, can splice its own DNA into over 100,000 pieces (!), re-arrange them in a highly systematic fashion, producing new protozoa that inherit a new set of characteristics.

In other words DNA can be likened to a computer program that re-writes itself on the fly. In fact this is how our own immune systems adapt to a nearly infinite range of possible threats and ward off attackers - through this kind of sophisticated adaptation.

Mr. Shapiro published a fascinating paper in the Journal of Biological Physics called "A 21st Century View of Evolution." In this paper, the failed "Random Mutation" view is discarded and replaced with a much more sophisticated, engineered process. Instead of seeing DNA as a static database that is acted on by outside random forces, it is now seen as being more like a intelligent operating system that repairs files, corrects errors, and adapts to changing circumstances. It's nothing short of amazing.

Shapiro's work clearly shows that evolution, however it may be understood, is anything but a random process.




http://shapiro.bsd.uchicago.edu/21st_Cent_View_Evol.html

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Diaboleros]
    #9356748 -

what the hell indeed.


--------------------


Nam-myoho-renge-kyo

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Do you think evolution is blind? [Re: Diaboleros]
    #9356752 -

Diaboleros said:
Mutations being random goes against everything science stands for.



What the hell?  This in no way follows.  There are plenty of random events in science; just look at radioactive decay or at probability waveforms in quantum mechanics.

In the second place, science has not proven that mutations are random: there is no such thing as proof in science, only disproof.


--------------------
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |  [ show all ]

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* change and the rapid evolution of humaninty...
( 1 2 3 all )
Smack31 5,915 57 09/25/02 04:27 PM
by shii-tan
* Radical Evolution
( 1 2 all )
exclusive58 3,201 22 04/30/06 07:01 PM
by HippyInASuit
* Evolution
( 1 2 3 4 all )
SkorpivoMusterion 9,315 61 12/08/03 03:34 PM
by Anonymous
* evolution
( 1 2 all )
Droz 4,835 29 10/02/01 12:29 PM
by dimethoxy
* evolution or creationism?
( 1 2 3 all )
top 5,476 52 11/17/05 09:19 PM
by Moonshoe
* Personal Predictability
( 1 2 all )
Swami 1,750 24 03/27/04 05:53 PM
by SpecialEd
* Miracle-blindness
( 1 2 3 all )
gribochek 4,934 41 02/06/02 04:58 PM
by ArCh_TemPlaR
* Evolution and natural selection (philosophy) SeussA 811 4 03/08/05 09:33 AM
by redgreenvines

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
11,993 topic views. 1 members, 111 guests and 23 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.029 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 17 queries.