so if you meant faith is reasonless, just know you've taken that saying way out of context.
The quote was not taken out of context, it was presented on it's own in Poor Richard's Almanac. Benjamin Franklin was a Deist, from what I gather from his writings he believed in the application of reason even to articles of religious faith and attempts to understand the nature of God. He did not deny faith but subjected it to critical thought in the light of reason. Yours is the only such interpretation of this quote I have encountered (and I can see how it can be read this way). Since I cannot reliably speak for a man long passed from this earth, I will leave you with several quotes from him so as to give you some insight into his way of thinking on matters of religious faith....
"I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies."
"Lighthouses are more helpful than churches."
"He [the Rev. Mr. Whitefield] used, indeed, sometimes to pray for my conversion, but never had the satisfaction of believing that his prayers were heard."
"Indeed, when religious people quarrel about religion, or hungry people quarrel about victuals, it looks as if they had not much of either among them."
"In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes."
"The nearest I can make it out, 'Love your Enemies' means, 'Hate your Friends'."
"I cannot conceive otherwise than that He, the Infinite Father, expects or requires no worship or praise from us, but that He is even infinitely above it."
"I wish it (Christianity) were more productive of good works ... I mean real good works ... not holy-day keeping, sermon-hearing ... or making long prayers, filled with flatteries and compliments despised by wise men, and much less capable of pleasing the Deity."
"My parents had early given me religious impressions, and brought me through my childhood piously in the dissenting [puritan] way. But I was scarce fifteen, when, after doubting by turns of several points, as I found them disputed in the different books I read, I began to doubt of Revelation itself. Some books against Deism fell into my hands; they were said to be the substance of sermons preached at Boyle's lectures. [Robert Boyle (1627-1691) was a British physicist who endowed the Boyle Lectures for defense of Christianity.] It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a thorough deist"
"Upon one of his [Reverend Whitefield] arrivals from England at Boston, he wrote to me that he should come soon to Philadelphia, but knew not where he could lodge when there, as he understood his old kind host Mr. Benezet was remov'd to Germantown. My answer was; You know my house, if you can make shift with its scanty accommodations you will be most heartily welcome. He reply'd, that if I made that kind offer for Christ's sake, I should not miss of a reward. And I returned, Don't let me be mistaken; it was not for Christ's sake, but for your sake."
"I looked around for God's judgments, but saw no signs of them."
"Like a man traveling in foggy weather, those at some distance before him on the road he sees wrapped up in the fog, as well as those behind him, and also the people in the fields on each side, but near him all appears clear, though in truth he is as much in the fog as any of them." -- From his autobiography, detailing his opinions about the delusions of sects. The only sect Franklin respected was that of the Quakers.
"Religion I found to be without any tendency to inspire, promote, or confirm morality, serves principally to divide us and make us unfriendly to one another."
and may peace be also with you...
Edited by Evolving (08/15/02 12:22 PM)
|