Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]
Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court
    #4263031 -

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/06/scotus.medical.marijuana/


That's just a blatant disrespectful overreaching of federal power :cuss:


--------------------
Magash's Grain Tek  + Tub-in-Tub Incubator + Magash's PMP + SBP Tek + Dunking = Practically all a newbie grower needs :thumbup:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Tao]
    #4263044 -

The liberal justices fucked this one up. Rehnquist dissented, as did O'Connor and Thomas. Those aren't the judges I expected to be in the minority.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Redstorm]
    #4263050 -

I just heard this as well. What a world. :rolleyes:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Tao]
    #4263054 -

Tao said:
That's just a blatant disrespectful overreaching of federal power :cuss:


Agreed.

"Few people see the logical absurdity of letting a government decide the meaning of the very document that is supposed to limit that government's powers."
- Joseph Sobran

From the U.S. Constitution's 'Bill of Rights' amendments:
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.


--------------------
Money doesn't grow on trees, but deficits do grow under Bushes.

You can accept, reject, or examine and test any new idea that comes to you. The wise man chooses the third way.
- Tom Willhite

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinions should I become aware of additional facts, the falsification of information or different perspectives. Articles written by others which I post may not necessarily reflect my opinions in part or in whole, my opinions may be in direct opposition, the topic may be one on which I have yet to formulate an opinion or have doubts about, an article may be posted solely with the intent to stimulate discussion or contemplation.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Redstorm]
    #4263066 -

Yep, O'Connor said if she were a legislator she would vote against it, but she's not, so she can't. Smart girl.


--------------------
Magash's Grain Tek  + Tub-in-Tub Incubator + Magash's PMP + SBP Tek + Dunking = Practically all a newbie grower needs :thumbup:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Redstorm]
    #4263069 -

The liberal/conservative line is so blurred. The 'liberal' NY Times slipped this into their article:

Quote:
Under the Constitution, Congress may pass laws regulating a state's economic activity so long as it involves "interstate commerce" that crosses state borders. The California marijuana in question was homegrown, distributed to patients without charge and without crossing state lines.



--------------------
Magash's Grain Tek  + Tub-in-Tub Incubator + Magash's PMP + SBP Tek + Dunking = Practically all a newbie grower needs :thumbup:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Tao]
    #4263072 -

Good. Now the government can crack down on immorality among the dying.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Tao]
    #4263204 -

A fucking shameful day.

If only the cops had busted Bush for marijuana back in the 70s.


From the linked article:
Quote:
In its hard-line stance in opposition to medical marijuana, the federal government invoked a larger issue. "The trafficking of drugs finances the work of terror, sustaining terrorists," said President Bush in December 2001. Tough enforcement, the government told the justices, "is central to combating illegal drug possession."


:rotfl: I still get such a kick out of that.


--------------------
what's with neocons and the word 'ilk'?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Tao]
    #4263211 -

the commerce clause renders the rest of the constitution null and void...the 9th and 10th amendments specifically were effectively overturned in US v Sprague (1931) on the grounds that they conflicted with the earlier commerce clause...

EDIT ..the marijuana case had in fact already been decided in 1942 (wickard v filburn)...

Edited by Annapurna1 (06/06/05 02:01 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Annapurna1]
    #4263256 -

The Commerce Clause is a legitimate provision in the Constitution and has been used to progress the country numerous times (desegregation for example). Unfortunately, the judges COMPLETELY misinterpreted the provision. The marijuana was not crossing state borders, so the Commerce Clause should have never been brought to the table.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Redstorm]
    #4263285 -

Justice Thomas states it so clearly: "Respondents Diane Monson and Angel Raich use marijuana that has never been bought or sold, that has never crossed state lines, and that has had no demonstrable effect on the national market for marijuana."

http://wid.ap.org/scotus/pdf/03-1454P.ZD1.pdf

here is a link to the Thomas dissent. I thought it kicked ass.

so we have 6 judges who do not give a shit about states rights. i thought scalia did but i guess he became the bush administrations little bitch on this one.


--------------------
America's debt problem is a "sign of leadership failure"

We have "reckless fiscal policies"

America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

Americans deserve better

Barack Obama

Edited by lonestar2004 (06/06/05 02:07 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Redstorm]
    #4263326 -

Redstorm said:
The Commerce Clause is a legitimate provision in the Constitution and has been used to progress the country numerous times (desegregation for example). Unfortunately, the judges COMPLETELY misinterpreted the provision. The marijuana was not crossing state borders, so the Commerce Clause should have never been brought to the table.


roscoe filburns' wheat wasnt crossing state borders either...the wickard ruling effectively gives the feds blanket power over any and all activity which involves a commodity that can be carried across a state line...wickard was without a doubt one of the proverbial nails in the coffin of liberty...

justice stevens may have meant to be sarcastic when he suggested that medical marijuana could be legalized in congress..which is virtually owned by the pharmaceutical and prison industries...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...

Edited by Annapurna1 (06/06/05 02:13 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Annapurna1]
    #4263427 -

See, that is absurd. I don't know how the courts could misconstrue something as simple as "crossing state lines".

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Redstorm]
    #4263495 -

Yeah, I was dissapointed by Scalia. The others were more predictable.

This means that we are going to have to switch completely to a populist anti-prohibiton campaign in congress and forget the courts.


--------------------
1. "After an hour I wasn't feeling anything so I decided to take another..."
2. "We were feeling pretty good so we decided to smoke a few bowls..."
3. "I had to be real quiet because my parents were asleep upstairs..."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Divided_Sky]
    #4263559 -

Luckily, we have the population on our side for medical MJ. I believe the medical MJ fight will be much easier than the fights that will come in the next few decades for recreational MJ.

But it's a start. We need to make Congress realize how many of the people they're representing support medical marijuana, and after that they'll just follow the crowd hopefully.


--------------------
So long as you are praised think only that you are not yet on your own path but on that of another.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Ravus]
    #4264179 -

it doesnt matter what the population thinks..it what the pharmaceutical and prison industries think that matters in congress...and that in turn can be blamed on corporate libertarians such as evolving and ancalogon(sp)...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...

Edited by Annapurna1 (06/06/05 04:58 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Annapurna1]
    #4264196 -

Annapurna1 said:
it doesnt matter what the population thinks..it what the pharmaceutical and prison industries think that matters in congress...and that in turn can be blamed on corporate libertarians such as evolving and ancalogon(sp)...


Excuse me, but when have either of those "corporate libertarians" ever supported the close relationship between corporations and the government to which you refer? My recollection is that both have long been adamantly opposed to it.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Tao]
    #4264487 -

Here's the best site I've found so far on this latest decision. Extremely comprehensive.

http://lsolum.blogspot.com/archives/2005_06_01_lsolum_archive.html#111806792342237189




Phred


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Silversoul]
    #4264530 -

Paradigm said:
Annapurna1 said:
it doesnt matter what the population thinks..it what the pharmaceutical and prison industries think that matters in congress...and that in turn can be blamed on corporate libertarians such as evolving and ancalogon(sp)...


Excuse me, but when have either of those "corporate libertarians" ever supported the close relationship between corporations and the government to which you refer? My recollection is that both have long been adamantly opposed to it.


that may be so..but its difficult for me to imagine how such partnerships could be avoided in the "hands-off" environment that they advocate...in certain industries such as pharmaceuticals..economies of scale will necessarily favour large..centralized corporations..which either the govt can tax and regulate..or else it will be vice-versa...

to get back on topic..im a bit curious as to how the 9th circuit court could have missed something as obvious as the wickard ruling...


--------------------


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...

Edited by Annapurna1 (06/06/05 06:58 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Medical MJ loses in Supreme Court [Re: Annapurna1]
    #4264600 -

this doesnt bother me much because legal or not, i have my sources to always get it whenever, so the government can suck my balls


--------------------
My cultivation guide.  How anyone can grow mushrooms. 

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Victory for Medical Marijuana Patients in Court! silversoul7 1,323 9 12/19/03 02:55 AM
by silversoul7
* Supreme Court to weigh medical marijuana laws
( 1 2 all )		 Anonymous 4,430 33 12/17/04 07:13 AM
by Lothar121
* Supreme Court Rules Cities May Sieze Homes
( 1 2 3 all )		 Pirate_Patrick 3,352 40 06/29/05 12:34 PM
by automan
* Supreme Court ruling: police may now use drug sniffing dogs during routine traffic stops SWEDEN 2,503 15 01/29/05 07:00 PM
by Swami
* Supreme Court to hear 'Pledge' Case
( 1 2 all )		 afoaf 2,741 26 10/16/03 09:03 PM
by afoaf
* The Supreme Court likes treats! afoaf 1,060 4 03/03/04 06:42 PM
by mabus
* Supreme Court Legalized Child Porn.
( 1 2 all )		 Ellis Dee 5,255 31 06/08/02 04:59 AM
by Anonymous
* Tradesport.com Favors Clement for Supreme Court lonestar2004 689 2 07/19/05 06:01 PM
by lonestar2004

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
2,674 topic views. 2 members, 11 guests and 15 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 16 queries.