The federal government's war on medical marijuana users is crumbling.
Yesterday, the largest federal appeals court in the country ruled that federal laws against marijuana may not apply to sick people who use medical marijuana with the approval of their physicians in states where medical marijuana is legal. (Please see http://www.mpp.org for MPP's news release and various news articles.)
As a result, Angel Raich and Diane Monson -- the two California patients who originally sued the U.S. Justice Department on October 9, 2002 -- are now legally allowed to use, possess, and grow their own marijuana. The DEA and John Ashcroft's thugs are now prohibited from arresting or harassing Raich and Monson unless a future court ruling overturns yesterday's court victory.
Yesterday's ruling falls on the heels of our October 14 victory with the U.S. Supreme Court, which decided not to hear the U.S. Justice Department's appeal to criminalize physicians who recommend the medical use of marijuana. (See http://mpp.org/releases/nr101403.html for details.)
The MPP grants program has been the primary funder of this litigation, but the courts are not what concern me. Congressman Mark Souder (R-IN) has announced his intention to introduce legislation to impose mandatory minimum prison sentences for patients who grow a few dozen marijuana plants, and Congressman Ernest Istook (R-OK) is responsible for legislation that will soon ban any marijuana policy advertising -- including privately funded medical marijuana ads -- on public transit systems in most U.S. cities.
Please donate today at http://www.mpp.org/donate so that MPP can afford to fight the monumental battle of preventing Congress from nullifying yesterday's court victory.
Randy Barnett, the Boston University constitutional law professor who successfully argued the case for Raich and Monson, is saying this case sets a new precedent. "It's the first time there's been a ruling that the application of the Controlled Substances Act to the application of cultivation of medical cannabis is unconstitutional," he said.
The California court drew on major court decisions that in recent years have limited the federal government's authority to control guns, pornography, and domestic violence. As with those matters, the court yesterday ruled that attempts to regulate purely intrastate medical marijuana activity fall outside the federal government's reach.
The U.S. Justice Department will surely appeal yesterday's ruling. Sometime next year, the courts will decide whether yesterday's ruling will protect patients in all western states that have medical marijuana laws (which would include Alaska, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington), all medical marijuana states in the nation (which would also include Colorado and Maine) or -- if yesterday's decision is overturned -- no states at all.
As the end of the year approaches, please consider donating to MPP's work at http://www.mpp.org/donate so that we will have the resources to lobby on Capitol Hill, generate grassroots pressure on Congress, and stimulate positive news coverage to preserve yesterday's court victory.
In short, the court ruled that Congress likely doesn't have the constitutional authority to ban the following activities: "The class of activities at issue in this case can properly be defined as the intrastate, noncommercial cultivation, possession and use of marijuana for personal medical purposes on the advice of a physician and in accordance with state law. This class of activities does not involve sale, exchange, or distribution." (page 14)
Below my signature line is the court's description of Raich's and Monson's medical conditions. When you read it, please keep in mind that the Bush administration's Justice Department was litigating -- at taxpayer expense -- that these two women should be prevented from using their medicine. And, should they use their medicine, they should be arrested and put in prison.
Sincerely,
Rob Kampia Executive Director Marijuana Policy Project Washington, D.C.
P.S. The court wrote the following on pages 5-6 of its opinion:
"Angel McClary Raich and Diane Monson (the "patient-appellants") are California citizens who currently use marijuana as a medical treatment. Appellant Raich has been diagnosed with more than ten serious medical conditions, including an inoperable brain tumor, life-threatening weight loss, a seizure disorder, nausea, and several chronic pain disorders. Appellant Monson suffers from severe chronic back pain and constant, painful muscle spasms. Her doctor states that these symptoms are caused by a degenerative disease of the spine.
"Raich has been using marijuana as a medication for over five years, every two waking hours of every day. Her doctor contends that Raich has tried essentially all other legal alternatives and all are either ineffective or result in intolerable side effects; her doctor has provided a list of thirty-five medications that fall into the latter category alone. Raich's doctor states that foregoing marijuana treatment may be fatal."
-------------------- Be all and you'll be to end all
|