Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Community > The Pub
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
latest supreme court descion
    #3677713 -

Yesterday the court made it legal for k-9's to be used w/o consent.
So here's the fear, they can have dogs at check points, around parked cars, and were ever else they see fit. "there goes the neighborhood"


--------------------
When the earth is ravaged and the animals are dying, a new tribe of people shall come unto the earth from many colors, classes, creeds, and who by their actions and deeds shall make the earth green again. They will be known as the warriors of the Rainbow -- Old Native American Prophecy


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: phlegmmaiden]
    #3677719 -

I can have sex with my dog now?

:wtf:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: OJK]
    #3677799 -

As long as you're not using drugs, it's okay...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: Le_Canard]
    #3677848 -

It's not that they have the right to do it without concent. The never needed consent, just probable cause. Now they don't have to have probable cause. I don't see this as a huge deal because probable cause is often bs anyway. Before all a cop had to do was say that a person looked nervous and they could have brought the dog out.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: Twister]
    #3677859 -

And to address the last part which I missed , it's is still only allowable to use the dog on vehicles in the case of traffic stops, at least relative to the new ruling.

Edited by Twister351 (01/25/05 01:15 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: Twister]
    #3677874 -

I shall say it again

Another right bites the dust
dun dun dun
Another right bites the dust

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: phlegmmaiden]
    #3678417 -

when do we get our numbers tattooed on our foreheads?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: phlegmmaiden]
    #3678425 -

In Canada are the rules for searching and consent any better?

That seal-clubbing little iceburg is getting more appealing everyday


--------------------
So long as you are praised think only that you are not yet on your own path but on that of another.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: Adden]
    #3678426 -

thats next week


--------------------
The land of the free on paper looks great!



here I stand head in hand turn my face to the wall

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: infamous]
    #3678432 -

seriouslly lately iv been contemplating moving to canadia (i know how its spelled if you dont have a sense of humor) more and more, and each time I inch towards it more and more.


--------------------
The land of the free on paper looks great!



here I stand head in hand turn my face to the wall

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: infamous]
    #3678460 -

Indeed.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: phlegmmaiden]
    #3678518 -

phlegmmaiden said:
Yesterday the court made it legal for k-9's to be used w/o consent.
So here's the fear, they can have dogs at check points, around parked cars, and were ever else they see fit. "there goes the neighborhood"


Everything you claim above is false. K9's could always be used with out consent, this is nothing new. The ruling simply states that if you get pulled over for a non-drug related driving offense, the police can use a K9 to search for illegal drugs without cause. The ruling does not give the police permission to use a K9 to search for illegal drugs without some other violation happening first. In other words, they cannot pull you over for no reason to use a dog to search your car... but if they pull you over for not wearing a seatbelt, they can then proceed to use a K9 to search for drugs. The ruling really doesn't change anything, but does take away an avenue that the defense could use to try and get somebody off after a bogus search.

What really bothers me about this is the length of time one can now be detained for a simple traffic stop while the police wait for a K9 to perform a search. It also encourages police to make bogus traffic stops in order to search people that match a 'druggy' profile. It also bothers me that the police can perform this search on a passenger in the car while it was the driver the broke the law resulting in getting pulled over in the first place.

Enjoy what is left of your freedoms while you have them... the united police states of america are forming as we type...


--------------------
Just another spore in the wind.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: Seuss]
    #3678551 -

What happens if the police pull you over for an apparent offence (e.g. having a seatbelt undone) but it turns out you in fact had it buckled up, and they were mistaken? Can they still search your car with a dog? If they did, would the evidence still be admissable in court?

I'm just curious....

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: latest supreme court descion [Re: OJK]
    #3678603 -

This court decision is only formalizing what was already in place. Someone probably got busted, but found a loop-hole by saying that they had been searched by dogs without consent in a public place. So now they're covering their asses by making it "writtingly legal" for a dog to search without consent.

Besides, when is the last time you heard or a cop asking permission before they have something searched with a K-9 unit. They still need "probable cause" and a search warrent before they can search your home or private property anyway.


--------------------
"Its Like a Koala Bear Crapped a Rainbow in my Brain"

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Community > The Pub
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Supreme Court rules it OK for local Governments to seize personal property DeadPhan 784 1 06/23/05 01:09 PM
by gdman
* .
( 1 2 all )		 AnonymousRabbit 4,598 22 05/25/08 06:43 PM
by johnm214
* California High Court to Decide Gay Marriage Case - EDIT: Ban Ruled Unconstitutional
( 1 2 all )		 Ferris 4,802 25 05/15/08 03:45 PM
by JacquesCousteau
* Smartshop Sjamaan in court to make shrooms legal again in Holland.
( 1 2 all )		 Fliquid 4,712 24 03/04/05 03:49 AM
by Fliquid
* The Age of Consent........
( 1 2 3 all )		 Mighty Bop 5,312 43 09/06/05 11:33 PM
by Skunk420
* i consented to a search of my car last night :(
( 1 2 all )		 ZippoZM 5,780 36 05/27/14 09:45 PM
by EdibleStereos
* Court Allows Church's Hallucinogenic Tea
( 1 2 all )		 Deadmaker 4,344 31 02/22/06 10:27 PM
by Divided_Sky
* One of my fellow students served it up to Supreme Suckass Scalia
( 1 2 all )		 OneMoreRobot3021 2,325 24 04/14/05 12:42 PM
by OneMoreRobot3021

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
1,128 topic views. 2 members, 966 guests and 203 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.029 seconds spending 0.011 seconds on 16 queries.