dinosaurs said:

there's 2-3 people in this thread that keep bringing up unrelated shit, lying about it, then wasting pages of this thread trying to win a semantic argument over something meaningless.


just shut the fuck up if that's your angle because I'm sick of having to sift through this shit for anything worthwhile.

---

Enlil said:

dinosaurs said:

there's 2-3 people in this thread that keep bringing up unrelated shit, lying about it, then wasting pages of this thread trying to win a semantic argument over something meaningless.

---

What is it that you think this thread is about?

---

sudly said:

Trump and his shenanigans.

Thats what I've been posting about

---

lowbrow said:

Their echo chamber’s got too many voices in it and they dont like it.  But they dont know how not to respond to the opposition. 

Perceiving the opposing viewpoint as an example of stereotypical rightwing troglidite chuds who are making their life a living hell, such a moment just cant be ignored.

Even something as innocuous as ‘you have your opinions and I have mine’ can send their teeth gnashing in a murderous rage.

---

vicepope said:

sudly said:

Trump and his shenanigans.

Thats what I've been posting about

---

Yea but without our tangents how can we effectively compare trumps crimes to other hate crime.

---

AlChemicalResearch said:

Lol if you think the Steele Dossier is real, we're done having a conversation. Steele basically came out and said he made it up to slander Trump.

---

AlChemicalResearch said:

ShroomDad said:

AlChemicalResearch said:

gww said:

Pointing out comparisons of americas hitler to germanys is not partisan but is good political intelligence and ability to debate.  When true, it is not hyperbole.  It would be more hyperbole to try and hide the comparisons.

I mean, when the shoe fits and we know the outcome from history, hiding it will do no good.  It is not over yet.  It is not the guy saying I love trump but lets try something different that is going to be the communicator that is going to lead.  It is going to be the guy who says we will tear down his reichstag ball room that is going to be the communicator you speak of becoming leaders.

---

well when 2028 comes around, and we haven't had an american hitler, be sure to help the democrats kill off a bunch of people then blame it on trump. at this point that is more likely than trump actually going about and committing a genocide.

I mean the democrats literally made something a felony AFTER trump did it and then charged him with 34 counts of it and tried to put him in jail for it. Meanwhile, not 3 years prior Hilary Clinton did it and got a 180,000$ slap on the wrist. I would say that is almost as corrupt as a crypto rug pull scheme

---

We have laws and they were not created by the Democrats to trap Trump or the Republicans. What he did is AKA 'cooking the books'..

"The jurors said they unanimously agreed that Trump falsified business records to conceal a $130,000 hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels to influence the outcome of the 2016 election."



What happened with Hillary: (if this incident is what you mean)

The Clinton/DNC Case:

Paying for opposition research is entirely legal under federal election law. The violation occurred strictly because the campaign and the party mislabeled the purpose of the payment on their mandatory public financial reports, describing it as "legal services" instead of opposition research.

Resolution & Penalty: Settled out of court without admitting wrongdoing. Fines totaled $113,000 ($8,000 for the Clinton campaign; $105,000 for the DNC).

---

Clinton was fined for falisification of records surrounding the Steele Dossier. You know that Dossier that made up that Trump was a Russian agent. And it was 105,000$ and 8000$, not 180,000$ Trump and Clinton were charged with the EXACT same legal charge. You can argue that paying off a porn star is worse than making up a fake story about how your opponent is Russian intelligence and pees on Russian prostitutes and then get 53 former intelligence service members to sign it, but that's irrelevent to the law. The charge was the same. I would say the making shit up about your political opponent is legally worse, cause it involves slander, whereas paying off a porn star is just that, paying off a porn star.

---