SARAtonin said:

Gopher is just joking dude, don’t come down on him too hard, he’s a good guy.

---

Well, you know, I watched his clip, and I am really trying to see the satirical angle/glean some shred of humor, but... I really don't see it.

The whole post (including that awfully bigoted video), reads like some misinformed islamaphobic idiotic propaganda that lowbrow would post.

From pig rennet (Which really isn't a thing in cheese manufacturing) to replacement theory hate-speech... I just don't see the humor.

Not hating on you gopher, but I do hate your shitty ass post

space daddy said:

Dipshits will believe anything.

I recall cheese having no rennet of pork. Never heard of it.

Just more nonsense from the brainwashed fools.

Edit: gopher ain't no dipshit

---

sudly said:

What will be on next week's episode of the effects of deregulation!

Join us for the regular instalments

---

shivas.wisdom said:

---

Quote:

No, it is not safe to eat beef containing chloramphenicol, which is a powerful antibiotic strictly banned for use in food-producing animals in the United States, European Union, and many other countries. [1, 2, 3]
## Key Health Risks

* Severe Blood Disorders: Chloramphenicol is linked to dose-independent aplastic anemia, a rare and potentially fatal condition where the bone marrow stops producing enough new blood cells. [3, 4]
* Bone Marrow Suppression: It can cause serious, irreversible damage to human bone marrow. [3]
* Resistant Bacteria: Using or consuming banned antibiotics contributes to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria that can make human infections harder to treat. [1]

## Regulations and Safety Standards

* Zero Tolerance: There is no established safe level or legal tolerance for chloramphenicol residues in meat.
* Cooking Does Not Help: Standard cooking or processing temperatures do not destroy chloramphenicol residues in meat.
* Banned Status: Regulatory bodies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration prohibit its use entirely in animals raised for human food. Any meat found to contain it is subject to import rejections and recalls. [1, 5, 6, 7, 8]

To help provide more relevant food safety information, could you share where you heard about or encountered this issue (such as a specific news report, product label, or country of origin)?

[1] [https://www.forbes.com](https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryroeloffs/2026/09/05/trump-confirms-tariff-free-beef-is-coming-from-brazil-and-argentina-amid-quality-controversies/)
[2] [https://www.consumerreports.org](https://www.consumerreports.org/food-safety/are-banned-drugs-in-your-meat/)
[3] [https://www.sciencedirect.com](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S3117382926000130)
[4] [https://randoxfood.com](https://randoxfood.com/meat-and-seafood-analysis/chloramphenicol-fast/)
[5] [https://www.newsnationnow.com](https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/how-avoid-beef-argentina/)
[6] [https://www.nytimes.com](https://www.nytimes.com/1984/06/19/science/q-a-010744.html)
[7] [https://scrunchyliving.com](https://scrunchyliving.com/blogs/non-toxic-living/antibiotics-in-imported-beef)
[8] [https://www.alreporter.com](https://www.alreporter.com/2026/08/27/sparks-urges-tougher-testing-of-imported-beef/)

---