Auto-SummaryThis forum thread is filled with skepticism towards vaccine data, with a user named koods vehemently disputing various points. Key arguments include:
1. Dismissal of vaccination rate data, citing lower infection rates in older groups in Scotland despite high vaccination rates.
2. Claims that vaccinated individuals are rarely hospitalized, despite a reported 3% hospitalization rate.
3. Criticism of the lack of sources in other posts and accusations of trolling.
4. Allegations of Pfizer admitting to heart-related side effects, countered by a study from Dr. Steven R. Gundry.
5. Discussion of a rare blood clot case linked to the vaccine, sourced from news articles.
6. Critique of WHO's side effect reports and a medical professional's website claiming natural immunity is superior.
7. Encouragement to explore global COVID-19 case statistics from worldometers.info.
8. Final plea for more critical thinking and reliance on official medical journals rather than media sensationalism.
The user dismisses the need for further debate, emphasizing the importance of engaging with reputable sources and critical analysis.
koods said: I’m pretty skeptical of your tables there. That doesn’t align with what’s happening in the states at all. And there’s no explanation how the unvaccinated risk would just plummet out of proportion like that. Infection rates in the over 65 ages are about 6-7 times lower than the 20-29 in Scotland which can only be explained by higher vaccination rates in the older group. I don’t believe your charts. I think they’re fake.
Anyways, not even three percent of hospitalizations here have been in the vaccinated, and despite most people being vaccinated by may, there were no vaccinated people hospitalized this week

I don't usually feed trolls, especially not ones who always deflect to something else, instead of debate the subject, don't post sources themselves, or post screenshots from gossip news outlets that also do not contain sources, and pose like they know better than established medical professionals.
But you seem you're at least a trying, and you're not the only one troll that posts here in this thread, so let me light up the darkness that you currently find yourselves in. And maybe other, more critical thinking members, might find the information contained within, useful as well.
1) The URL is in the screenshots I posted, which, if you actually looked, would've noticed, nice attempt to deflect. Anyway, good luck, since you seem to find a lot of shit without my help, this shouldn't be a problem since the URL is provided. I can't help you with why other countries or media outlets don't provide such detailed info. Info that's actually needed to base a subjective opinion on. For example, per 100.000 individuals, unvaccinated, 1 shot, 2 shots, etc... Without that data, you are unable to form any well informed conclusions, like you, and others here, seem to enjoy doing anyway.
2) Also, Pfizer recently admitted to Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) and added it to their list of side effects for the vaccine. Which you contradict. So the following published study:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
From Dr. Steven R. Gundry is completely valid. See this screenshot:

It's straight from the website of Pfizer;
https://www.comirnaty.com/
3) Plus some news article from probably the first, that is admitted so far, patient that died because the vaccine caused blood cloths resulting in heart failure. This should be straight up your alley, since it's a media outlet, instead of an official "government or medical" source:
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-blood-clots-from-astrazeneca-jab-killed-mother-coroner-finds-12479406 https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-59434281
4) The WHO actually has a website which lists the "reports/cases” submitted so far of the side effects/ADRs from the COVID-19 vaccines. Today's count is at: 2.622.859. You can also compare it to other vaccines such as the measles for example. Warning, the list of side effects/ADRs for COVID-19 vaccines is long. It's publicly accessible here (search for "COVID-19 Vaccine" to see the COVID vax data):
http://vigiaccess.org/
5) Here's a personal website from a medical professional, a fully qualified epidemiologist, who keeps it up to date himself, with research articles from medical journals (with peer review ongoing) about natural immunity vs vaccinated produced immunity, 135 medical studies so far and counting:
https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/
No surprise to many of us here, I'm sure, is that natural acquired immunity is superior to the current "vaccines". They had to change the definition of the word vaccine to make it fit in the first place, and even then it fails to uphold to the meaning. What a fail.
6) You still haven't provided a source for your unfounded speculation that the new variant comes from immuno compromised individuals?
While it was discovered in four fully vaccinated foreign diplomats visiting Botswana. And instead pretended not to notice the question. Why is that?
7) Another useful website is:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
It has the official count of cases globally, and per country, so you can easily see if the media is sensationalizing it or telling the truth.
8) I could go on posting studies from other medical journals, or links to other media articles, but I think this is enough food for thought for now. And I'm tired of typing and actually have more interesting things to do then to debate internet trolls. I just wish some trolls would stop with the media propaganda, and instead start investigating the shit they post prior, in for example official medical journals. And to stop posing like they are fully qualified armchair doctors knowing it better than the qualified researchers publishing in respected medical journals. But that might be too difficult for some... Or maybe that doesn't pay as well to influence others with propaganda. And I'm beginning to ask myself why the admins/mods allow such trolls in the first place. I wonder
Edited by spinvis (11/29/21 08:32 AM)
|